But of course, people choose to be assholes and pretend all sorts nonsense when they CHOOSE to murder innocent people that they never met before. Like when the muslims strap a bomb on a 12 year old boy and use him to destroy INNOCENT people that had nothing to do with anything, islam is like that. Not seeing too many Christians or Jews doing such heinous acts. Funny that.
They're there if you want to see 'em though. I'm afraid what we're dealing with is the contrast between on the one hand common perceptions as promulgated by media, including certainly message boards like this, and on the other hand actual reality.
>> If one follows the cable news networks, it seems as if all terrorists are Muslims. It has even become axiomatic in some circles to chant: “Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims.” Muslims and their “leftist dhimmi allies” respond feebly, mentioning Waco as the one counter example, unwittingly affirming the belief that “nearly all terrorists are Muslims.”
But perception is not reality. The data simply does not support such a hasty conclusion. On the FBI’s official website, there exists a chronological list of all terrorist attacks committed on U.S. soil from the year 1980 all the way to 2005. That list can be accessed
here (scroll down all the way to the bottom).
According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%). These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.
Yet notice the
disparity in media coverage between the two. It would indeed be very interesting to construct a corresponding pie chart that depicted the level of media coverage of each group. The reason that Muslim apologists and their “leftist dhimmi allies” cannot recall another non-Islamic act of terrorism other than Waco is due to the fact that the media gives menial (if any) coverage to such events.
If a terrorist attack does not fit the “Islam is the perennial and existential threat of our times” narrative, it is simply not paid much attention to, which in a circuitous manner reinforces and “proves” the preconceived narrative. It is to such an extent that the average American cannot remember any Jewish or Latino terrorist; why should he when he has never even heard of the Jewish Defense League or the Ejercito Popular Boricua Macheteros? Surely what he does not know does not exist! <<
That's been posted many times before of course. Here's a recent update that focuses on Europe:
>> But what about across the pond? The data gathered by Europol strengthens my argument even further. (hat tip: Koppe) Europol publishes an annual report entitled
EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. On their
official website, you can access the reports from
2007,
2008, and
2009. (If anyone can find the reports from earlier than that, please let me know so we can include those as well.)
The results are stark, and prove decisively that not all terrorists are Muslims. In fact, a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam. Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups. Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims. <<
(more data and charts at the link
here)
There's common perceptions (a/k/a myths) -- and there's Reality. When the latter disproves the former ----- it's time for the former to take a hike.
The real question becomes -- if the perception is demonstrably false .... WHO is pushing that perception, and why?
--- or perhaps looked at the other way, who is
burying all these OTHER stories and ignoring them, and why?