Zone1 Which is worse to America: the spread of socialism or of Islam?

[Mr. Friscus]

You didn't have a problem with the Muslims until you stole their land.

Who stole what land?

They ravaged and conquered Jerusalem in the 600's-700's. It wasn't theirs. Now, when someone comes back and takes it, you whine? Stop crying. History is filled with the stronger force taking land. The Muslims aren't effective at taking land because they aren't smart due to all of their generations of in-breeding. They get their asses kicked whenever they try to attack Israel. So they're no victims. They're the aggressors who just suck at fighting.

 

[JoeB131]

Who stole what land?

They ravaged and conquered Jerusalem in the 600's-700's. It wasn't theirs. Now, when someone comes back and takes it, you whine? Stop crying. History is filled with the stronger force taking land. The Muslims aren't effective at taking land because they aren't smart due to all of their generations of in-breeding. They get their asses kicked whenever they try to attack Israel. So they're no victims. They're the aggressors who just suck at fighting.

So by that logic, it was okay for the Nazis to take Jewish land and send them to the camps because they were "Stronger".

Besides your racist comments about "inbreeding" (seriously, have you been to the American South recently?) the fact is, the Arabs took Jerusalem from the Ottomans because the British promised them their own countries.

Instead, they carved it up into mandates and dumped Europe's Jewish refuse into the place.

 

[Meathead]

Who stole what land?

They ravaged and conquered Jerusalem in the 600's-700's. It wasn't theirs. Now, when someone comes back and takes it, you whine? Stop crying. History is filled with the stronger force taking land. The Muslims aren't effective at taking land because they aren't smart due to all of their generations of in-breeding. They get their asses kicked whenever they try to attack Israel. So they're no victims. They're the aggressors who just suck at fighting.

Muslims conquered a lot of land and spread a gutter religion called Islam through it. Joey probably thinks Christians should give Portugal, Spain and Armenia back:

 

[Lisa558]

Muslims conquered a lot of land and spread a gutter religion called Islam through it. Joey probably thinks Christians should give Portugal, Spain and Armenia back:

View attachment 1205169

And therein lies the antisemitism. Land was always conquered by various groups, and Islamists took a LOT of it. So too have groups expelled groups, with Jews being on the losing end multiple times.

There is never any mention of all of that, though. It’s only an issue when the antisemites can figure out a way to blame Jews. There are the Double Standards of Antisemitism.

P.S. And it’s a stretch, anyway, to say Jews conquered Israel. First, most of the Arab landowners were paid (and paid a LOT for their arid land they couldn’t figure out how to irrigate) whereas the 850,000 Jews driven out of the Middle East didn’t receive a cent; and second, the areas bordering Egypt and Jordan which Jew-haters say Jews stole were a result of Egypt and Jordan launching an attack to destroy Israel.

 

[JoeB131]

And therein lies the antisemitism. Land was always conquered by various groups, and Islamists took a LOT of it. So too have groups expelled groups, with Jews being on the losing end multiple times.

There is never any mention of all of that, though. It’s only an issue when the antisemites can figure out a way to blame Jews. There are the Double Standards of Antisemitism.

P.S. And it’s a stretch, anyway, to say Jews conquered Israel. First, most of the Arab landowners were paid (and paid a LOT for their arid land they couldn’t figure out how to irrigate) whereas the 850,000 Jews driven out of the Middle East didn’t receive a cent; and second, the areas bordering Egypt and Jordan which Jew-haters say Jews stole were a result of Egypt and Jordan launching an attack to destroy Israel.

"We cheated them out of that land fair and square!!!"

You keep telling the 850,000 lie. More than half of that were French Jews leaving North Africa because the party was over when the French left. The ironic thing was that when the Nazis and Vichy demanded North Africa's Jews be sent to the camps, the King of Morocco and the Bey of Tunis refused to cooperate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Worst things for America

1. The Federal Reserve
2. Fraudulent elections
3. Corrupt Congress that put themselves on Commission
4. War > Peace
   1. Middle East
   2. EU
   3. Countless military bases

 

[Meathead]

Worst things for America

1. The Federal Reserve
2. Fraudulent elections
3. Corrupt Congress that put themselves on Commission
4. War > Peace
   1. Middle East
   2. EU
   3. Countless military bases

You forgot Somalis.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

So by that logic, it was okay for the Nazis to take Jewish land and send them to the camps because they were "Stronger".

Did Israel use an army to come in and conquer the land via a war? No.

Besides your racist comments about "inbreeding"

How is that racist? It’s true. Muslim nations have like 50+% inbreeding. Do you deny that?

(seriously, have you been to the American South recently?)

Inbreeding in America is like less than 1%. So, your attempt doesn’t work

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You forgot Somalis.

Way down in my list

 

[JoeB131]

Did Israel use an army to come in and conquer the land via a war? No.

Yes, they did.

How is that racist? It’s true. Muslim nations have like 50+% inbreeding. Do you deny that?

Nope, you are just repeating racist tropes.

 

[PeterPilot]

Oh good, another post by a Bibibot.

 

[pal]

Both sides are without sentence.

 

[pal]

Communism are prettier.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Yes, they did.


Nope, you are just repeating racist tropes.

In-breeding by Country:
Pakistan 61%
Kuwait 54%
Qatar 54%
UAE 50%
Sudan 50%
South Sudan 50%
Afghanistan 49%
Iraq 46%
Yemen 48%
Saudi Arabia 39%
Libya 37%
Syria 35%

Inbreeding by Country 2026

Data on the frequency of inbreeding/consanguinuity by country, including countries where inbreeding is common, countries in which inbreeding is uncommon, and the country with the highest rate of inbreeding in the world.

worldpopulationreview.com

Oh, and by the way, USA 0.1%

Given your arguments here, I wouldn't be surprised if it involved you.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

So by that logic, it was okay for the Nazis to take Jewish land and send them to the camps because they were "Stronger".

Israelies didn't use a standing army to conquer Israel, so once again, your attempt pathetically falls on its face. You're not very good at this.

Meanwhile, Muslims only came around in the 6th-7th centuries. Jews were there far before. Your side is always about "natives" and their land. Why aren't you painting the Muslim invaders as colonial occupiers on stolen land?

 

[Lisa558]

What is the definition of in-breeding? First cousins (or closer)?

In-breeding by Country:
Pakistan 61%
Kuwait 54%
Qatar 54%
UAE 50%
Sudan 50%
South Sudan 50%
Afghanistan 49%
Iraq 46%
Yemen 48%
Saudi Arabia 39%
Libya 37%
Syria 35%

Inbreeding by Country 2026

Data on the frequency of inbreeding/consanguinuity by country, including countries where inbreeding is common, countries in which inbreeding is uncommon, and the country with the highest rate of inbreeding in the world.

worldpopulationreview.com

Oh, and by the way, USA 0.1%

Given your arguments here, I wouldn't be surprised if it involved you.

 

[Lockback]

What is the definition of in-breeding? First cousins (or closer)?

I believe that is correct.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

What is the definition of in-breeding? First cousins (or closer)?

I'm pretty sure it's first cousin or closer.

 

[Lisa558]

Israelies didn't use a standing army to conquer Israel, so once again, your attempt pathetically falls on its face. You're not very good at this.

Meanwhile, Muslims only came around in the 6th-7th centuries. Jews were there far before. Your side is always about "natives" and their land. Why aren't you painting the Muslim invaders as colonial occupiers on stolen land?

Because he only blames Jews for whatever happens.

 

[JoeB131]

Israelies didn't use a standing army to conquer Israel, so once again, your attempt pathetically falls on its face. You're not very good at this.

Wait, a "Standing Army"? the IDF looks like a standing army to me. Come on, guy, this was colonialism and aggression.

Meanwhile, Muslims only came around in the 6th-7th centuries. Jews were there far before. Your side is always about "natives" and their land. Why aren't you painting the Muslim invaders as colonial occupiers on stolen land?

Because they've been there for 1300 years...

The Zionists only came there in the 20th century, after they couldn't get along with their fellow Europeans. (Here's where Lisa will start whining I'm supporting the Holocaust or something.)

So let's be honest why the Zionist Entity exists. It exists because the western world felt really sad about what Hitler did (as it should).

Hey, I feel really sad about how America has treated black people, so I'm going to give YOUR house and property to a deserving black family. Lisa's house, too, while we are at it.

Seems fair to me.