Is It Possible Trump Could Get A fair Trial

[Independent thinker]

I'm neither the judge nor the jury, nor am I blind to reality. I have no responsibility to presume his innocence.

I do have a moral and patriotic responsibility to promote fairness and truth. Which is what makes me believe that Trump will be found guilty.

You are partisanly blind.

 

[hadit]

What do you have against the guilty being found guilty?

Or do you believe that trial verdicts should be determined by the defendant's wealth?

Nope, I think the trial should start with a blank slate, guilt to be determined BY the trial. In fact, they go to some pains to find people with no knowledge of the accused or the charges, if possible. If a trial is just a formality, it's not a fair trial.

 

[berg80]

Smith is trying to ensure he gets a fair trial by keeping him from tainting the jury pool.

In a redacted motion unsealed Friday by order of U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, Special Counsel Jack Smith is seeking to impose additional restrictions on Donald Trump’s out-of-court statements to prevent him from continuing to attack the legitimacy of the criminal proceedings against him and from tainting the jury pool in DC.

Of the various filings referred to in today’s Morning Memo, this is probably the one worth reading yourself. It’s a blistering takedown of Trump’s conduct since his indictment, comparing it to his efforts to spread anger and misinformation in the aftermath of the 2020 election (editor’s note: citations removed):

Jack Smith Is Steadily Boxing Donald Trump In At Every Turn

Stay tuned for rulings as early as this week from Judge Chutkan on this motion from Smith and on Trump’s motion for her to recuse herself.

talkingpointsmemo.com

57-Redacted Motion

www.documentcloud.org

 

[sealybobo]

LOL. Was it this thread where someone posted about, yes, have a fair trial just before the hanging?

With the evidence I know they have against him, he's fucked. Let's be honest. OJ got a fair trial because no one saw him do it. And he didn't get caught on tape saying he did it.

 

[sealybobo]

LOL. Was it this thread where someone posted about, yes, have a fair trial just before the hanging?

Aren't you the guys who chanted "lock her up?" LOL. The irony of this.

 

[Frankenstein]

Most of the right have admitted they don't want to have a fair trial because they have already found him to be innocent.

Well gee if it weren't so blatantly obvious it is purely a political hit job, Maybe we could listen. It a purely political hit job!

 

[Frankenstein]

Aren't you the guys who chanted "lock her up?" LOL. The irony of this.

Of course however trump let her skate! Beeeyotch was guilty as hell

 

[gmeyers1944]

Democrats can question election results. When Republicans do the same, Democrats make it appear that the Republican committed a crime.

 

[berg80]

Democrats can question election results. When Republicans do the same, Democrats make it appear that the Republican committed a crime.

Thank you for another wildly inaccurate false equivalence. You've really contributed to the discussion on a high level.

 

[Frankenstein]

Thank you for another wildly inaccurate false equivalence. You've really contributed to the discussion on a high level.

Why yes, yes he did it, started with Gore, Kerry did it to a lesser degree, and Hillary is still whining, so suck it

 

[Frankenstein]

With the evidence I know they have against him, he's fucked. Let's be honest. OJ got a fair trial because no one saw him do it. And he didn't get caught on tape saying he did it.

You know what your told to know, and believe, those of us with eyes and a soul know better

 

[bripat9643]

My main thing is that he hasn't done anything democrats haven't done and we don't need a two tiered justice system. If you let one side go then you have to do the same for the other. Democrats have cried election fraud and stolen elections for decades and, as far as classified documents go, if there is a time limit for how long you can have them in your possession then Biden is far ahead of Trump.

You think justice is what this trial is about?

 

[Hum Dinger]

You are partisanly blind.

If you mean by "partisanly Blind" that I refuse to be gas lighted, then yes, I am partisanly blind - and proud of it!

 

[scruffy]

It's funny how quick Conservatives are to judge and condemn everyone based on prejudices, hearsay, stereotypes and delusions.

But when their orange god openly commits treason, suddenly they're all screaming for a "Fair Trial".

Oh...did I forget to mention that for Trump:

A Fair Trial Ends in a HANGING!

Asshole. ^^^

 

[scruffy]

Yes, I want him to have a fair trial before he gets hung.

You're on ignore, asswipe.

Bye.

 

[scruffy]

Smith is trying to ensure he gets a fair trial by keeping him from tainting the jury pool.

In a redacted motion unsealed Friday by order of U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, Special Counsel Jack Smith is seeking to impose additional restrictions on Donald Trump’s out-of-court statements to prevent him from continuing to attack the legitimacy of the criminal proceedings against him and from tainting the jury pool in DC.

Of the various filings referred to in today’s Morning Memo, this is probably the one worth reading yourself. It’s a blistering takedown of Trump’s conduct since his indictment, comparing it to his efforts to spread anger and misinformation in the aftermath of the 2020 election (editor’s note: citations removed):

Jack Smith Is Steadily Boxing Donald Trump In At Every Turn

Stay tuned for rulings as early as this week from Judge Chutkan on this motion from Smith and on Trump’s motion for her to recuse herself.

talkingpointsmemo.com

57-Redacted Motion

www.documentcloud.org

BLM is the biggest spreader of hatred and anger in America.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Nope, I think the trial should start with a blank slate, guilt to be determined BY the trial. In fact, they go to some pains to find people with no knowledge of the accused or the charges, if possible. If a trial is just a formality, it's not a fair trial.

No, the jury should be instructed by the Judge to understand the law, and to make any judgements based on the law.

I'm no law expert, but I'm certain that no society could exist if there are not laws which Trump is very, very guilty of violating.

Perhaps in your delusional fairy tale land there are no laws against organizing an insurrection and the overthrow of a legal and true election.

 

[Mac1958]

If he's convicted of anything, he and his sheep will say it was rigged.

Just like the 2020 election. Just like the 2016 primary loss to Cruz. Just like when he didn't win the Emmy in 2017.

His profoundly damaged little ego won't allow it, and his sheep will follow along as always. Proof won't be needed, as usual.

 

[sealybobo]

Of course however trump let her skate! Beeeyotch was guilty as hell

yea but so was everyone else. Trump had the luxury of saying he never did it because he was never a politician. But as soon as he got into office, he did it too.

 

[Arlette]

and find a jury in a dark blue city where not one of the jurors was biased against Trump and have a judge who was not biased against Trump? I find that highly unlikely. Is an accused person still forced to stand trial even if it is obvious that they can't have a fair trial? If so, then we have the definition of a kangaroo court.

hehehe