Nope, the very FACT that the universe exists proves it is probable for the universe to exist. Only a pure idiot would argue that the very existence of the universe proves it shouldn't exist.
More fallacious, circular thinking and ad hominems,
edthecynic . Just more wrongness and idiocy from you.
Does the "fact" that a car exists mean that it is probable for another car to exist? No. It could be the very first car. How did it come to be? Once you figure out what it does and how it works, you'd think it was designed and created by someone. You'd find out it was made of metal, glass, leather, etc. and someone made these parts. Hawking thought this could not be, so had to make up something else by looking into the parts even more and figured out it was made of tiny particles that the eye couldn't see. He couldn't believe someone invisible could have made it, so thought under certain conditions these invisible particles could form into the parts and eventually the car. He thought people would not believe him so he said the car exists when it shouldn't exist.
The very fact that something exists belies the claim that it shouldn't exist. DUH!
You're assuming the facts. Then God exists and atheists end up going to Gehenna.
prove the existence of God and Gehenna.
You are not reading and understanding. There is no proof, just evidence. Proof isn't just to convince one person, but all non-believers. In order to convince "all" non-believers, i.e. 100% consensus, the only way I know how to do that is through pain and suffering. And in the Bible, this is what's written about Gehenna and what happens to non-believers in the afterlife. One needs faith to believe in God, the supernatural (Genesis only) and the Bible.
If we do not assume something just popped into existence from tiny, tiny particles that we can't see under special conditions, then something had to cause it to happen. This is what Hawking could not explain. He could not explain why it happened. He could only explain how it happened, but not everyone agreed with him because it does not happen with larger invisible particles. Thus, he ended up saying that the universe, everything in it and us exist, but it should not exist. There had to be a cause and it had to overcome the physics of how larger particles act. This is the evidence for God.