Is it "Congress's" Constitutional Duty To Raise The Debt Ceiling?

[tahuyaman]

no it doesn’t. It simply says he won’t be questioned. It says nothing about paying it

Yes, it won’t be questioned. It will be paid.
Sheesh.

 

[struth]

Yes, it won’t be questioned. It will be paid.
Sheesh.

um not if you don’t have the money. One can not pay their credit card wirh out questioning they owe the money

 

[struth]

Then tell me how they are not linked. Tell me how a section of the US constitution dealing with paying the US debt is not linked with the debt limit?

it doesn’t say anything about paying the debt that is something you added

 

[The5thHorseman]

I don't know what that means but I have always been for fiscal responsibility and blame both parties for our 32 trillion dollar debt. Don't you think it is high time we started addressing our runaway spending?

Stop voting for big spenders.

and blame both parties for our 32 trillion dollar debt.

Don't....they aren't equally to blame.

You make lousy choices because you're credulous.

You haven't spent a nanosecond looking at spending records.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Yes, let's look at who had control of congress...................

Screw that lousy dodge...

Familiarize yourself with the budget process, and the historical data.

 

[The5thHorseman]

WTF are you talking about?

What puzzles you?

 

[tahuyaman]

What puzzles you?

Your gibberish.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Your gibberish.

Specifically...

Quote the part you don’t understand.

 

[tahuyaman]

it doesn’t say anything about paying the debt that is something you added

Are you really this dense?

 

[tahuyaman]

Specifically...

Quote the part you don’t understand.

I don’t speak gibberish. Maybe re-post that comment in a coherent manner.

 

[struth]

Are you really this dense?

i know this goes over your head and requires critical thinking skills

 

[The5thHorseman]

I don’t speak gibberish. Maybe re-post that comment in a coherent manner.

That's not the issue.

There's nothing wrong with what I posted....you don't understand the terms.

 

[tahuyaman]

That's not the issue.

There's nothing wrong with what I posted....you don't understand the terms.

Whatever it was, it made no sense.

 

[struth]

That's stupid.

Revenues should grow in relation to nominal GDP.

It doesn't happen "because Supply Side"

GDP increased after Reagan tax cuts

under Xiden we got a lot of negative gdp growth but revenue still was at historic highs thanks to trumps tax cuts

 

[The5thHorseman]

Whatever it was, it made no sense.

Google the terms.

I'm not responsible for the gaps in your knowledge.

 

[The5thHorseman]

GDP increased after Reagan tax cuts

under Xiden we got a lot of negative gdp growth but revenue still was at historic highs thanks to trumps tax cuts

No, that's a bunch of ignorant drivel.

Grifty's tax cuts failed to accomplish the only thing Grifty wanted out of them - a calendar year with 3% growth



They were, by any measure, an abysmal failure....as predicted.

 

[tahuyaman]

Google the terms.

I'm not responsible for the gaps in your knowledge.

Your horrible communication skills isn’t my problem.

 

[tahuyaman]

No, that's a bunch of ignorant drivel.

Grifty's tax cuts failed to accomplish the only thing Grifty wanted out of them - a calendar year with 3% growth



They were, by any measure, an abysmal failure....as predicted.

Well, Barack Obama was the first two term president to never see a 3% annual growth rate and I’m sure you think that was a sign of success.

 

[tahuyaman]

No, that's a bunch of ignorant drivel.

Grifty's tax cuts failed to accomplish the only thing Grifty wanted out of them - a calendar year with 3% growth



They were, by any measure, an abysmal failure....as predicted.

The Tax cuts were intended to generate more revenues. That’s exactly what happened. Things were going well until governors shut down their states because of a virus.

 

[struth]

No, that's a bunch of ignorant drivel.

Grifty's tax cuts failed to accomplish the only thing Grifty wanted out of them - a calendar year with 3% growth



They were, by any measure, an abysmal failure....as predicted.

they raised tax revenue that’s the point of tax policy

the economy grew as well, better then what he inherited, real wages rose as well.