Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The question is not an indictment on the Trump campaign. The question seeks a simple yes or no answer. Is it acceptable, proper and normal for any campaign to solicit, receive or accept damaging information on an opponent from a foreign adversary?
I would limit it to countries we are officially at war with. I would like it verified and then I don't care about the source. the truth is the truthThe question is not an indictment on the Trump campaign. The question seeks a simple yes or no answer. Is it acceptable, proper and normal for any campaign to solicit, receive or accept damaging information on an opponent from a foreign adversary?
A foreadversary communicate to the campaign that they have dirt on your opponent. Is it acceptable to receive, solicit or otherwise obtain that information from a foreign source.You're going to have to first tell me what" Is it acceptable for a campaiyto seek and/or accept adverse information on an opponent from a hostil" Means.
Let’s check out what the World Trade Organization, which controls our Economy, has to say about that.The question is not an indictment on the Trump campaign. The question seeks a simple yes or no answer. Is it acceptable, proper and normal for any campaign to solicit, receive or accept damaging information on an opponent from a foreign adversary?
Short answer to the question? No, it is not acceptable for any US political campaign to accept help from foreign governments.
[USC04] 52 USC 30121: Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
§30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for-
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
(b) "Foreign national" defined
As used in this section, the term "foreign national" means-
(1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term "foreign national" shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.
You're going to have to first tell me what" Is it acceptable for a campaiyto seek and/or accept adverse information on an opponent from a hostil" Means.
Let me correct you, unverified and salacious, and they actually knew the source and knew The DNC and Clinton campaign paid for it. They also knew Obama chipped in $1 Million of his own money for it. They also knew Christopher Steele, Blumenthal and Skirpal created it for the sole purposes of using it as campaign propaganda.Proper and normal? What the hell is "proper and normal" these days? Is it proper and normal for a cabal in the FBI to use an unverified dossier from a foreign agent to try to influence an election or undermine an administration?
Russians are white, and therefore Democrats hate them.We aren't at war with Russia. But just what is it that makes democrats at war with Russia? Simple, Russia warns us about terrorists getting into the country and it's democrats that want those terrorists here. If we did not have a politicized and democrat controlled FBI we would never have had the Boston Bombers. If we did not have shitstain obama and his minions screening refugees in order to approve the entry of terrorists, we would never have had isis in Sacramento.
Russians are white, and therefore Democrats hate them.We aren't at war with Russia. But just what is it that makes democrats at war with Russia? Simple, Russia warns us about terrorists getting into the country and it's democrats that want those terrorists here. If we did not have a politicized and democrat controlled FBI we would never have had the Boston Bombers. If we did not have shitstain obama and his minions screening refugees in order to approve the entry of terrorists, we would never have had isis in Sacramento.
It is really as simple as that.
Russians are white, and therefore Democrats hate them.We aren't at war with Russia. But just what is it that makes democrats at war with Russia? Simple, Russia warns us about terrorists getting into the country and it's democrats that want those terrorists here. If we did not have a politicized and democrat controlled FBI we would never have had the Boston Bombers. If we did not have shitstain obama and his minions screening refugees in order to approve the entry of terrorists, we would never have had isis in Sacramento.
It is really as simple as that.
