Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?

[OnePercenter]

The same thing was said about Playboy Magazine.

Thanks for not following the links provided that show the huge difference.

Stay in the past and ignore the new reality that our technology has produced.

Regards
DL

Your welcome.

Playboy in 1964 is to what internet porn is to 2015.

 

[RKMBrown]

Are you in the porn industry? Did they make you speaker?

Is that the only authority you'll believe?

PP acolytes only believe what is fed to them by PP propagandists.

I reckon porn acolytes only believe what is fed to them by the porn industry PR men.

Is that a yes or a no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

I typically don't answer nonsensical questions that serve no purpose except to illustrate the idiocy of the person asking the question.

Yes or no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

You can't make statements like and I quote... "there are no women in the porn industry who aren't being abused and exploited" if you don't speak even for ONE OF THE WOMEN IN THE PORN INDUSTRY. Who the HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

Here's a weird question: why is it legal/OK for someone to pay Bill and Mary to have sex on camera in order to sell porn videos - they even file tax returns as sex workers - but it is illegal for Bill to pay Mary directly to have sex, that's prostitution?

Is a woman doing what is illegal a form of abuse?

Regards
DL

The reason prostitution is illegal, is the morality police are a bunch of authoritarians jerks that need to get out of everyone else's business. We're supposed to be this free country.. but that's a myth. We live under the soft tyranny of the democrat/republican two headed snake.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?

These scholars and experts are at the forefront of this research. Apologies but you will have to listen to at least one of these clips to get what this O.P. is all about.

http://www.upworthy.com/some-tips-for-how-to-talk-to-your-teen-about-watching-porn-hint-its-not-to-tell-them-to-stop?c=reccon2
http://www.ted.com/talks/zimchallenge?language=en
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKAehegqTvg&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs

Is it possible that in sexual matters, the right wing conservatives might be ahead of the left wing in their thinking?

If not, then what should the left do to help us save our children from the indoctrination via internet porn into unhealthy and unwanted sexual habits? Or have them not be able to perform without porn?

I consider myself left wing but I think we may be going a tad far and should move to the right on this issue due to things like you saw in the clips above as well as what is shown in this clip below.



At one time, parents would have closed any shop that gave access to the young to porn. Yet today, parents do not seem to care and as more and more young children get cell phones, parental prohibition will be impossible.

Have parents forgotten how to parent and are men and women willing to allow the status quo to ruin the sexuality of the next generation?

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime." - Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart

To date, I have lived by the above quote. I do not lack confidence in our adult population but see this issue as more of a medical one and I am willing to censure for our children's sake.

Some Eastern countries have used censorship to gain control of what their children can access. Should the West do the same?

Are our children worth it?

Regards
DL

I think education is the key here. If you teach kids how to be decent parents, have kids learn to think for themselves and make judgements on what is right and wrong at an early age, by the time they're parents they'll already have a clear idea of how they want to be as parents.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Is that the only authority you'll believe?

PP acolytes only believe what is fed to them by PP propagandists.

I reckon porn acolytes only believe what is fed to them by the porn industry PR men.

Is that a yes or a no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

I typically don't answer nonsensical questions that serve no purpose except to illustrate the idiocy of the person asking the question.

Yes or no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

You can't make statements like and I quote... "there are no women in the porn industry who aren't being abused and exploited" if you don't speak even for ONE OF THE WOMEN IN THE PORN INDUSTRY. Who the HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

Here's a weird question: why is it legal/OK for someone to pay Bill and Mary to have sex on camera in order to sell porn videos - they even file tax returns as sex workers - but it is illegal for Bill to pay Mary directly to have sex, that's prostitution?

Is a woman doing what is illegal a form of abuse?

Regards
DL

The reason prostitution is illegal, is the morality police are a bunch of authoritarians jerks that need to get out of everyone else's business. We're supposed to be this free country.. but that's a myth. We live under the soft tyranny of the democrat/republican two headed snake.

Hyperbolic nonsense.

Although inalienable, our rights are not absolute, and subject to reasonable restrictions by government. (See, e.g., DC v. Heller)

We are a free country, it is not a 'myth,' and our legal process is designed to create a Constitutional balance between freedom to and freedom from, where laws and regulatory measures must be rational, fact-based, and pursue a proper legislative end.

 

[HUGGY]

Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?

These scholars and experts are at the forefront of this research. Apologies but you will have to listen to at least one of these clips to get what this O.P. is all about.

http://www.upworthy.com/some-tips-for-how-to-talk-to-your-teen-about-watching-porn-hint-its-not-to-tell-them-to-stop?c=reccon2
http://www.ted.com/talks/zimchallenge?language=en
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKAehegqTvg&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs

Is it possible that in sexual matters, the right wing conservatives might be ahead of the left wing in their thinking?

If not, then what should the left do to help us save our children from the indoctrination via internet porn into unhealthy and unwanted sexual habits? Or have them not be able to perform without porn?

I consider myself left wing but I think we may be going a tad far and should move to the right on this issue due to things like you saw in the clips above as well as what is shown in this clip below.



At one time, parents would have closed any shop that gave access to the young to porn. Yet today, parents do not seem to care and as more and more young children get cell phones, parental prohibition will be impossible.

Have parents forgotten how to parent and are men and women willing to allow the status quo to ruin the sexuality of the next generation?

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime." - Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart

To date, I have lived by the above quote. I do not lack confidence in our adult population but see this issue as more of a medical one and I am willing to censure for our children's sake.

Some Eastern countries have used censorship to gain control of what their children can access. Should the West do the same?

Are our children worth it?

Regards
DL

Porn is addictive. Porn is very lucrative. That is a bad combination to fight against.

There is no profit in suggesting that porn be controlled.

The Constitution prohibits it's restraint. This, the third pillar of strength that porn enjoys is by far the most powerful to go up against.

There was no way for the founders to envision this far into the future when constructing our guidelines as a nation. There was no such thing as porn. The camera had not yet been invented. All images were hand drawn.

The main thing that makes porn the insidious evil it is that it is based on natural urges. Hormones that rage in post pubescent youths drive the sex urges. Our laws prohibit the natural expression of those urges so we by protecting our young people from the consequences of sexual activity drive the curious underground. These young people must keep their urges and involvement in viewing sexual activity a secret. These secretive habits follow them on through their latter years still urged on by hormonal drives.

The question is how to alter a natural human desire without the conflicts that would come up legally with the constitution as it is now written.

The answer is you can't. Freedom of speech was obviously intended in the political sense as "porn" wasn't even considered by the forefathers. If they could have had a crystal ball and seen into the future the First Amendment would have addressed more specifically it's intent.

It would take a constitutional amendment to extract porn from the freedom of speech protection it now enjoys. I don't see that happening. Porn is here to stay and it will get worse. As it creeps steadily into the mainstream our so-called-culture is doomed.

 

[Davros]

There is nothing positive about prostitution. Most often it involves victimization the prostitute and sometimes also the john. STDs, robbery, murder, and exploitation of vulnerable, desperate women are closely associated with it. Also paying someone for sex seems sad.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There is nothing positive about prostitution. Most often it involves victimization the prostitute and sometimes also the john. STDs, robbery, murder, and exploitation of vulnerable, desperate women are closely associated with it. Also paying someone for sex seems sad.

No one says there is.

But it will never go away.

And governments are clearly doing a poor job of 'managing' prostitution by criminalizing it.

 

[Davros]

Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?

These scholars and experts are at the forefront of this research. Apologies but you will have to listen to at least one of these clips to get what this O.P. is all about.

http://www.upworthy.com/some-tips-for-how-to-talk-to-your-teen-about-watching-porn-hint-its-not-to-tell-them-to-stop?c=reccon2
http://www.ted.com/talks/zimchallenge?language=en
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKAehegqTvg&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs

Is it possible that in sexual matters, the right wing conservatives might be ahead of the left wing in their thinking?

If not, then what should the left do to help us save our children from the indoctrination via internet porn into unhealthy and unwanted sexual habits? Or have them not be able to perform without porn?

I consider myself left wing but I think we may be going a tad far and should move to the right on this issue due to things like you saw in the clips above as well as what is shown in this clip below.



At one time, parents would have closed any shop that gave access to the young to porn. Yet today, parents do not seem to care and as more and more young children get cell phones, parental prohibition will be impossible.

Have parents forgotten how to parent and are men and women willing to allow the status quo to ruin the sexuality of the next generation?

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime." - Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart

To date, I have lived by the above quote. I do not lack confidence in our adult population but see this issue as more of a medical one and I am willing to censure for our children's sake.

Some Eastern countries have used censorship to gain control of what their children can access. Should the West do the same?

Are our children worth it?

Regards
DL

Porn is addictive. Porn is very lucrative. That is a bad combination to fight against.

There is no profit in suggesting that porn be controlled.

The Constitution prohibits it's restraint. This, the third pillar of strength that porn enjoys is by far the most powerful to go up against.

There was no way for the founders to envision this far into the future when constructing our guidelines as a nation. There was no such thing as porn. The camera had not yet been invented. All images were hand drawn.

The main thing that makes porn the insidious evil it is that it is based on natural urges. Hormones that rage in post pubescent youths drive the sex urges. Our laws prohibit the natural expression of those urges so we by protecting our young people from the consequences of sexual activity drive the curious underground. These young people must keep their urges and involvement in viewing sexual activity a secret. These secretive habits follow them on through their latter years still urged on by hormonal drives.

The question is how to alter a natural human desire without the conflicts that would come up legally with the constitution as it is now written.

The answer is you can't. Freedom of speech was obviously intended in the political sense as "porn" wasn't even considered by the forefathers. If they could have had a crystal ball and seen into the future the First Amendment would have addressed more specifically it's intent.

It would take a constitutional amendment to extract porn from the freedom of speech protection it now enjoys. I don't see that happening. Porn is here to stay and it will get worse. As it creeps steadily into the mainstream our so-called-culture is doomed.

Well said. Hollywood produces a lot of porn these days.

 

[Davros]

There is nothing positive about prostitution. Most often it involves victimization the prostitute and sometimes also the john. STDs, robbery, murder, and exploitation of vulnerable, desperate women are closely associated with it. Also paying someone for sex seems sad.

No one says there is.

But it will never go away.

And governments are clearly doing a poor job of 'managing' prostitution by criminalizing it.

The oldest profession. But how would legalizing it make things any better? STDs would still be there. Prostitutes would still be vulnerable women. Murderers prey on them. Also if the john can't afford a thousand dollar prostitute he'd still be dealing with someone desperate who might just rob him or worse.

 

[Davros]

If porn is produced in a mainstream environment where exploitation and victimization is minimized, it is better than prostitution. But it still would have its addictive effect on its viewers where they learn to dehumanizing the objects of their sexual desire.

Making porn illegal ... main problem is that porn is hard to define. Should we make all the prime time TV shows illegal? They are pornographic.

 

[Moonglow]

There is nothing positive about prostitution. Most often it involves victimization the prostitute and sometimes also the john. STDs, robbery, murder, and exploitation of vulnerable, desperate women are closely associated with it. Also paying someone for sex seems sad.

You pay to date and get nothing, that is sad also..

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Pornography as existed for generations, none of which were 'ruined.'

 

[Davros]

Pornography as existed for generations, none of which were 'ruined.'

Would you say Internet pornography presents a challenge for the next generation? Or is it an issue that only affects a few people in a significant way?

 

[koshergrl]

Is that the only authority you'll believe?

PP acolytes only believe what is fed to them by PP propagandists.

I reckon porn acolytes only believe what is fed to them by the porn industry PR men.

Is that a yes or a no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

I typically don't answer nonsensical questions that serve no purpose except to illustrate the idiocy of the person asking the question.

Yes or no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

You can't make statements like and I quote... "there are no women in the porn industry who aren't being abused and exploited" if you don't speak even for ONE OF THE WOMEN IN THE PORN INDUSTRY. Who the HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

Here's a weird question: why is it legal/OK for someone to pay Bill and Mary to have sex on camera in order to sell porn videos - they even file tax returns as sex workers - but it is illegal for Bill to pay Mary directly to have sex, that's prostitution?

Is a woman doing what is illegal a form of abuse?

Regards
DL

The reason prostitution is illegal, is the morality police are a bunch of authoritarians jerks that need to get out of everyone else's business. We're supposed to be this free country.. but that's a myth. We live under the soft tyranny of the democrat/republican two headed snake.

Prostitution is illegal because it is a vehicle by which women and girls are sold, abused, and killed.

 

[koshergrl]

But misogynistic pigs don't give a fuck, as long as they can buy a piece for themselves.

 

[RKMBrown]

Is that a yes or a no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

I typically don't answer nonsensical questions that serve no purpose except to illustrate the idiocy of the person asking the question.

Yes or no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

You can't make statements like and I quote... "there are no women in the porn industry who aren't being abused and exploited" if you don't speak even for ONE OF THE WOMEN IN THE PORN INDUSTRY. Who the HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

Here's a weird question: why is it legal/OK for someone to pay Bill and Mary to have sex on camera in order to sell porn videos - they even file tax returns as sex workers - but it is illegal for Bill to pay Mary directly to have sex, that's prostitution?

Is a woman doing what is illegal a form of abuse?

Regards
DL

The reason prostitution is illegal, is the morality police are a bunch of authoritarians jerks that need to get out of everyone else's business. We're supposed to be this free country.. but that's a myth. We live under the soft tyranny of the democrat/republican two headed snake.

Hyperbolic nonsense.

Although inalienable, our rights are not absolute, and subject to reasonable restrictions by government. (See, e.g., DC v. Heller)

We are a free country, it is not a 'myth,' and our legal process is designed to create a Constitutional balance between freedom to and freedom from, where laws and regulatory measures must be rational, fact-based, and pursue a proper legislative end.

Bullshit. You're an indentured servant subject to tyrannical laws.

 

[RKMBrown]

Is that a yes or a no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

I typically don't answer nonsensical questions that serve no purpose except to illustrate the idiocy of the person asking the question.

Yes or no? Do you or do you not speak for the porn industry?

You can't make statements like and I quote... "there are no women in the porn industry who aren't being abused and exploited" if you don't speak even for ONE OF THE WOMEN IN THE PORN INDUSTRY. Who the HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

Here's a weird question: why is it legal/OK for someone to pay Bill and Mary to have sex on camera in order to sell porn videos - they even file tax returns as sex workers - but it is illegal for Bill to pay Mary directly to have sex, that's prostitution?

Is a woman doing what is illegal a form of abuse?

Regards
DL

The reason prostitution is illegal, is the morality police are a bunch of authoritarians jerks that need to get out of everyone else's business. We're supposed to be this free country.. but that's a myth. We live under the soft tyranny of the democrat/republican two headed snake.

Prostitution is illegal because it is a vehicle by which women and girls are sold, abused, and killed.

Bullshit. Prostitution is illegal because you and your authoritarian majority want to force your religion on the rest of the population.

 

[RKMBrown]

But misogynistic pigs don't give a fuck, as long as they can buy a piece for themselves.

How much did you charge them?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?
... DL

Yes... Internet porn is an endless train of ever increasing degrees of degeneracy... .

Thus as the individual witnesses one level, its senses become saturated and must move to the next level to become aroused. Repeat and wipe until eventually it ends up in the kiddy porn... or the snuff-films and inevitably it can find no satisfaction in the mere viewing of such material and must extend itself into the actual act.

Some people find the strength of character to stop the obsession and some do not. For them... there is only death.

Now, the question becomes: Do you have a right to subject others to such. The answer to which is an emphatic NO.

There is no right to injure another and there is no pornography that does not injure those who have participated in the creation, distribution and viewing of such.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

What is the legal mumbo jumbo that allows porn merchants to put their porn into the hands of minors? Why is it illegal to sell or even display porn to underage kids via books, magazines and video's, but allowed over the internet? If a minor gets access to a porn site, why isn't the porn site held legally responsible?

That is what is known as Relativism...

It is legal to distribute over the web, because of a poorly reasoned decision by the SCOTUS, back in the 1970s, which declared such to be protected by the 1st amendment.

The decision was tragic then... but the effects of such have now shuttered throughout human civilization causing what was then, unimaginable... in terms of the devastation it has produced.

One seemingly insignificant decision; hailed by the reprobates and of course academia as brilliant insight, which just a couple of generations later, has crippled millions upon MILLIONS of people.

And that decision was NOTHING in comparison to the more recent decision to openly license degeneracy... .