Interesting view, since Liberals created this country and wrote its Constitution.
Wonder where that leaves you. In a dark alley?
Is he even President anymore?
- Thread starter eddiew37
- Start date
Interesting view, since Liberals created this country and wrote its Constitution.
Wonder where that leaves you. In a dark alley?
With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
:
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
Liberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
You sound like one of the shills in the media. we don't believe them anymore. You do. If Trump is cheated out of this and he is not so far, he must try do everything the political class promised over the years. Everything before Beijing Biden gets sworn in. He will put the Political class...especially the Progs in a bind. Either they will agree or it will be a grand cluster ph uk for them. And it will be well deserved. We Non Progs need to stir the swill with extra ingredients in it every chance we get. I can't help it. I was taught the right courses in school. Just like many others of my age. If Progs, its how they interpreted it that is screwed up. Don't worry we are going to make modern cars again. They are dusting up the specs for the 1971 Ford Pinto again. Laughing at the Yugo!
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
Who was a liberal in the Constitutional Congress? The founders wanted a democracy not socialism. Otherwise you'd have more respect for the Constitution as it is written. Electoral College and Supreme Court too.
Liberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Trust me, I haven't wasted my time "lecturing" you on anything. It would go nowhere. I simply pointed out that in a grand observation about character, you tried to make it about politics.
And you just did it again, this time suggesting that a pejorative name for a political party somehow has some connection to personality traits.
It's obvious you're way out of your league here and have no function beyond infantile trolling. You have, or wish to appear to have, the intellectual capacity of a turnip.
MaryAnne11
Gold Member
- Oct 1, 2016
- 2,034
- 762
- 200
Learn that chidish name calling from Your master?
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
I wouldn't trust you if you told me it's Wednesday assholeLiberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Trust me, I haven't wasted my time "lecturing" you on anything. It would go nowhere. I simply pointed out that in a grand observation about character, you tried to make it about politics.
And you just did it again, this time suggesting that a pejorative name for a political party somehow has some connection to personality traits.
It's obvious you're way out of your league here and have no function beyond infantile trolling.
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
No, from a gender-confused liberal ANTIFA warrior.
I wouldn't trust you if you told me it's Wednesday assholeLiberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Trust me, I haven't wasted my time "lecturing" you on anything. It would go nowhere. I simply pointed out that in a grand observation about character, you tried to make it about politics.
And you just did it again, this time suggesting that a pejorative name for a political party somehow has some connection to personality traits.
It's obvious you're way out of your league here and have no function beyond infantile trolling. You have, or wish to appear to have, the intellectual capacity of a turnip.
QED.
BUH bye now. Good luck growing up, "66"-boi.
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
Time for supper at the nursing home?I wouldn't trust you if you told me it's Wednesday assholeLiberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Trust me, I haven't wasted my time "lecturing" you on anything. It would go nowhere. I simply pointed out that in a grand observation about character, you tried to make it about politics.
And you just did it again, this time suggesting that a pejorative name for a political party somehow has some connection to personality traits.
It's obvious you're way out of your league here and have no function beyond infantile trolling. You have, or wish to appear to have, the intellectual capacity of a turnip.
QED.
BUH bye now. Good luck growing up, "66"-boi.
MaryAnne11
Gold Member
- Oct 1, 2016
- 2,034
- 762
- 200
Still jerking off to the thought of his tax returns, eh?At most he'll owe a few million in back taxes.A LAUNDRY LIST
ut federal charges aren’t the likeliest way that The People v. Donald J. Trump will play out. State laws aren’t subject to presidential pardons, and they cover a host of crimes beyond those committed in the White House. When it comes to charging a former president, state attorneys general and county prosecutors can go places a U.S. Attorney can’t.
According to legal experts, the man most likely to drag Trump into court is the district attorney for Manhattan, Cyrus Vance Jr. It’s a surprising scenario, given Vance’s well-deserved reputation as someone who has gone easy on the rich and famous. After taking office in 2010, he sought to reduce Jeffrey Epstein’s status as a sex offender, dropped an investigation into whether Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. had committed fraud in the marketing of the Trump Soho, and initially decided not to prosecute Harvey Weinstein despite solid evidence of his sex crimes. “He has a reputation for being particularly cautious when it comes to going after rich people, because he knows that those are the ones who can afford the really formidable law firms,” says Victoria Bassetti, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice who served on the team of lawyers that oversaw the Senate impeachment trial of Bill Clinton. “And like most prosecutors, Vance is exceptionally protective of his win-loss rate.”
But it was Vance who stepped up when the federal case against Trump faltered. “He’s a politician,” observes Martin Sheil, a former IRS criminal investigator. “He’s got his finger up. He knows which way the wind’s blowing, and he knows the wind in New York is blowing against Trump. It’s in his political interest to join that bandwagon.”
Last year, after U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District dropped their investigation into the hush money that Trump had paid Stormy Daniels, Vance took up the case. Suspecting that l’affaire Stormy might prove to be part of a larger pattern of shady dealings, his office started digging into Trump’s finances. What Vance is investigating, according to court filings, is evidence of “extensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization,” potentially involving bank fraud, tax fraud, and insurance fraud. The New York Times has detailed how Trump and his family have long falsified records to avoid taxes, and during testimony before Congress in 2019, Trump’s longtime fixer Michael Cohen stated that Trump had inflated the value of his assets to obtain a bank loan.
Crucially, all of these alleged crimes occurred before Trump took office. That means no claims of executive privilege would apply to any charges Vance might bring, and no presidential pardon could make them go away. A whole slew of potential objections and delays would be ruled out right off the bat. What’s more, the alleged offenses took place less than six years ago, within the statute of limitation for fraud in New York. Vance, in other words, is free to go after Trump not as a crooked president but as a common crook who happened to get elected president. And the fact that he has been pursuing these cases while Trump is president is a sign that he won’t be intimidated by the stature of the office after Trump leaves it.
In writing up an indictment against Trump, Vance’s team could try to string together a laundry list of offenses in hopes of presenting an overwhelming wall of guilt. But that approach, experts warn, can become confusing. “A two- or three-count indictment is easier to explain to a jury,” says Ilene Jaroslaw, a former assistant U.S. Attorney. “If they think the person had criminal intent, it doesn’t matter if it’s two counts or 20 counts, in most cases, because the sentence will be the same.”
There are two main charges that Vance is likely to pursue. The first is falsifying business records (N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10). During Cohen’s trial, federal prosecutors filed a sentencing memorandum that explained how the Trump Organization had mischaracterized hush-money payments as “legal expenses” in its bookkeeping. Under New York law, falsifying records by itself is only a misdemeanor, but if it results in the commission of another crime, it becomes a felony. And false business records frequently lead to another offense: tax fraud (N.Y. Tax Law § 1806).
If Trump cooked his books, observes Sheil, that false information would essentially “flow into the tax returns.” The first crime begets the second, making both the bookkeeper and the tax accountant liable. “Since you have several folks involved,” Sheil says, “you could either bring a conspiracy charge, maximum sentence five years, or you could charge each individual with aiding and abetting the preparation of a false tax return, with a max sentence of three years.”
To build a fraud case against Trump, Vance subpoenaed his financial records. But those records alone won’t be enough: To secure a conviction, Vance will need to convince a jury not only that Trump cheated on his taxes but that he intended to do so. “If you just have the documents, the defense will say that defendant didn’t have criminal intent,” Jaroslaw explains. “I call it the ‘I’m an idiot’ defense: ‘I made a mistake. I didn’t mean to do anything.’ ” Unfortunately for Trump, both Cohen and his longtime accountant, Allen Weisselberg, have already signaled their willingness to cooperate with prosecutors. “What’s great about having an accountant in the witness stand is that they can tell you about the conversation they had with the client,” Jaroslaw says.
Through appeals, Trump has managed to drag out the battle over his tax returns. The case has gone all the way to the Supreme Court, back down to the district court, and back up to the appeals court. But Trump has lost at every stage, and it appears that his appeals could be exhausted this fall. Once Vance gets the tax returns, Eisen estimates, he could be ready to indict Trump as early as the second quarter of 2021.
Sheil, for one, believes Vance may already have Trump’s financial records. It’s routine procedure, he notes, for criminal tax investigators working with the Manhattan DA to obtain personal and business tax returns that are material to their inquiry. But issuing a subpoena to Trump’s accountants may have been a way to signal to them that they could face criminal charges themselves unless they cooperate in the investigation.
Once indicted, Trump would be arraigned at New York Criminal Court, a towering Art Deco building at 100 Centre Street. Since a former president with a Secret Service detail can hardly slip away unnoticed, he would likely not be required to post bail or forfeit his passport while awaiting trial. His legal team, of course, would do everything it could to draw out the proceedings. Filing appeals has always been just another day at the office for Trump, who, by some estimates, has faced more than 4,000 lawsuits during the course of his career. But this time, his legal liability would extend to numerous other state and local jurisdictions, which will also be building cases against him. “There’s like 1,037 other things where, if anybody put what he did under a microscope, they would probably find an enormous amount of financial improprieties,” says Scott Shapiro, director of the Center for Law and Philosophy at Yale University.
Even accounting for legal delays, many experts predict that Trump would go to trial in Manhattan by 2023. The proceedings would take place at the New York State Supreme Court Building. Assuming that the judge was prepared for an endless barrage of motions and objections from Trump’s defense team, the trial might move quite quickly — no longer than a few months, according to some legal observers. And given the convictions that have been handed down against many of Trump’s top advisers, there’s reason to believe that even pro-Trump jurors can be persuaded to convict him. “The evidence was overwhelming,” concluded one MAGA supporter who served on the jury that convicted Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman. “I did not want [him] to be guilty. But he was, and no one is above the law.”
Trump’s conviction would seal the greatest downfall in American politics since Richard Nixon. Unlike his associates who were sentenced to prison on federal charges, Trump would not be eligible for a presidential pardon or commutation, even from himself. And while his lawyers would file every appeal they can think of, none of it would spare Trump the indignity of imprisonment. Unlike the federal court system, which often allows prisoners to remain free during the appeals process, state courts tend to waste no time in carrying out punishment. After someone is sentenced in New York City, their next stop is Rikers Island. Once there, as Trump awaited transfer to a state prison, the man who’d treated the presidency like a piggy bank would receive yet another handout at the public expense: a toothbrush and toothpaste, bedding, a towel, and a green plastic cup.
*This article appears in the September 14, 2020, issue of New York
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-criminal-prosecution.html
https://www.gamedaynews.com/basketball/the-wives-and-girlfriends-of-nba-greats/?utm_source=tb&utm_medium=nymagazine-dailyintelligencer-tb&utm_term=NBA+Wife+Turns+Heads+Wherever+She+Goes-https://www.gamedaynews.com/hivemedia-images/creatives/fzt/2_fzt.jpg&utm_content=2942470545&utm_campaign=7079717-tb&utm_cpc=0.2047
https://trkr.wildalaskancompany.com/de6a1678-c4c5-4e7f-87a7-332fe03ac1fd?site=nymagazine-dailyintelligencer&site_id=1038961&medium=native&platform=Desktop&campaign_id=2296914&campaign_item_id=2931377250&thumbnail=http://cdn.taboola.com/static/77/77e08919-f427-428f-84e4-9c36799390f0.png&click_id=GiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc&tblci=GiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc#tblciGiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc
What Happened When This Group Of Fishermen Noticed Something Strange On An Iceberg? | Xfreehub
BUT more importantly, his tax returns may be public, and we may find out whether he'll admit in legal document to owing Moscow and Bejing hundreds of millions.
The guy who demands an answer to posts like that?
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
Yep. I'm an abrasive asshole to liberal bitches like you.Still jerking off to the thought of his tax returns, eh?At most he'll owe a few million in back taxes.A LAUNDRY LIST
ut federal charges aren’t the likeliest way that The People v. Donald J. Trump will play out. State laws aren’t subject to presidential pardons, and they cover a host of crimes beyond those committed in the White House. When it comes to charging a former president, state attorneys general and county prosecutors can go places a U.S. Attorney can’t.
According to legal experts, the man most likely to drag Trump into court is the district attorney for Manhattan, Cyrus Vance Jr. It’s a surprising scenario, given Vance’s well-deserved reputation as someone who has gone easy on the rich and famous. After taking office in 2010, he sought to reduce Jeffrey Epstein’s status as a sex offender, dropped an investigation into whether Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. had committed fraud in the marketing of the Trump Soho, and initially decided not to prosecute Harvey Weinstein despite solid evidence of his sex crimes. “He has a reputation for being particularly cautious when it comes to going after rich people, because he knows that those are the ones who can afford the really formidable law firms,” says Victoria Bassetti, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice who served on the team of lawyers that oversaw the Senate impeachment trial of Bill Clinton. “And like most prosecutors, Vance is exceptionally protective of his win-loss rate.”
But it was Vance who stepped up when the federal case against Trump faltered. “He’s a politician,” observes Martin Sheil, a former IRS criminal investigator. “He’s got his finger up. He knows which way the wind’s blowing, and he knows the wind in New York is blowing against Trump. It’s in his political interest to join that bandwagon.”
Last year, after U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District dropped their investigation into the hush money that Trump had paid Stormy Daniels, Vance took up the case. Suspecting that l’affaire Stormy might prove to be part of a larger pattern of shady dealings, his office started digging into Trump’s finances. What Vance is investigating, according to court filings, is evidence of “extensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization,” potentially involving bank fraud, tax fraud, and insurance fraud. The New York Times has detailed how Trump and his family have long falsified records to avoid taxes, and during testimony before Congress in 2019, Trump’s longtime fixer Michael Cohen stated that Trump had inflated the value of his assets to obtain a bank loan.
Crucially, all of these alleged crimes occurred before Trump took office. That means no claims of executive privilege would apply to any charges Vance might bring, and no presidential pardon could make them go away. A whole slew of potential objections and delays would be ruled out right off the bat. What’s more, the alleged offenses took place less than six years ago, within the statute of limitation for fraud in New York. Vance, in other words, is free to go after Trump not as a crooked president but as a common crook who happened to get elected president. And the fact that he has been pursuing these cases while Trump is president is a sign that he won’t be intimidated by the stature of the office after Trump leaves it.
In writing up an indictment against Trump, Vance’s team could try to string together a laundry list of offenses in hopes of presenting an overwhelming wall of guilt. But that approach, experts warn, can become confusing. “A two- or three-count indictment is easier to explain to a jury,” says Ilene Jaroslaw, a former assistant U.S. Attorney. “If they think the person had criminal intent, it doesn’t matter if it’s two counts or 20 counts, in most cases, because the sentence will be the same.”
There are two main charges that Vance is likely to pursue. The first is falsifying business records (N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10). During Cohen’s trial, federal prosecutors filed a sentencing memorandum that explained how the Trump Organization had mischaracterized hush-money payments as “legal expenses” in its bookkeeping. Under New York law, falsifying records by itself is only a misdemeanor, but if it results in the commission of another crime, it becomes a felony. And false business records frequently lead to another offense: tax fraud (N.Y. Tax Law § 1806).
If Trump cooked his books, observes Sheil, that false information would essentially “flow into the tax returns.” The first crime begets the second, making both the bookkeeper and the tax accountant liable. “Since you have several folks involved,” Sheil says, “you could either bring a conspiracy charge, maximum sentence five years, or you could charge each individual with aiding and abetting the preparation of a false tax return, with a max sentence of three years.”
To build a fraud case against Trump, Vance subpoenaed his financial records. But those records alone won’t be enough: To secure a conviction, Vance will need to convince a jury not only that Trump cheated on his taxes but that he intended to do so. “If you just have the documents, the defense will say that defendant didn’t have criminal intent,” Jaroslaw explains. “I call it the ‘I’m an idiot’ defense: ‘I made a mistake. I didn’t mean to do anything.’ ” Unfortunately for Trump, both Cohen and his longtime accountant, Allen Weisselberg, have already signaled their willingness to cooperate with prosecutors. “What’s great about having an accountant in the witness stand is that they can tell you about the conversation they had with the client,” Jaroslaw says.
Through appeals, Trump has managed to drag out the battle over his tax returns. The case has gone all the way to the Supreme Court, back down to the district court, and back up to the appeals court. But Trump has lost at every stage, and it appears that his appeals could be exhausted this fall. Once Vance gets the tax returns, Eisen estimates, he could be ready to indict Trump as early as the second quarter of 2021.
Sheil, for one, believes Vance may already have Trump’s financial records. It’s routine procedure, he notes, for criminal tax investigators working with the Manhattan DA to obtain personal and business tax returns that are material to their inquiry. But issuing a subpoena to Trump’s accountants may have been a way to signal to them that they could face criminal charges themselves unless they cooperate in the investigation.
Once indicted, Trump would be arraigned at New York Criminal Court, a towering Art Deco building at 100 Centre Street. Since a former president with a Secret Service detail can hardly slip away unnoticed, he would likely not be required to post bail or forfeit his passport while awaiting trial. His legal team, of course, would do everything it could to draw out the proceedings. Filing appeals has always been just another day at the office for Trump, who, by some estimates, has faced more than 4,000 lawsuits during the course of his career. But this time, his legal liability would extend to numerous other state and local jurisdictions, which will also be building cases against him. “There’s like 1,037 other things where, if anybody put what he did under a microscope, they would probably find an enormous amount of financial improprieties,” says Scott Shapiro, director of the Center for Law and Philosophy at Yale University.
Even accounting for legal delays, many experts predict that Trump would go to trial in Manhattan by 2023. The proceedings would take place at the New York State Supreme Court Building. Assuming that the judge was prepared for an endless barrage of motions and objections from Trump’s defense team, the trial might move quite quickly — no longer than a few months, according to some legal observers. And given the convictions that have been handed down against many of Trump’s top advisers, there’s reason to believe that even pro-Trump jurors can be persuaded to convict him. “The evidence was overwhelming,” concluded one MAGA supporter who served on the jury that convicted Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman. “I did not want [him] to be guilty. But he was, and no one is above the law.”
Trump’s conviction would seal the greatest downfall in American politics since Richard Nixon. Unlike his associates who were sentenced to prison on federal charges, Trump would not be eligible for a presidential pardon or commutation, even from himself. And while his lawyers would file every appeal they can think of, none of it would spare Trump the indignity of imprisonment. Unlike the federal court system, which often allows prisoners to remain free during the appeals process, state courts tend to waste no time in carrying out punishment. After someone is sentenced in New York City, their next stop is Rikers Island. Once there, as Trump awaited transfer to a state prison, the man who’d treated the presidency like a piggy bank would receive yet another handout at the public expense: a toothbrush and toothpaste, bedding, a towel, and a green plastic cup.
*This article appears in the September 14, 2020, issue of New York
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-criminal-prosecution.html
https://www.gamedaynews.com/basketball/the-wives-and-girlfriends-of-nba-greats/?utm_source=tb&utm_medium=nymagazine-dailyintelligencer-tb&utm_term=NBA+Wife+Turns+Heads+Wherever+She+Goes-https://www.gamedaynews.com/hivemedia-images/creatives/fzt/2_fzt.jpg&utm_content=2942470545&utm_campaign=7079717-tb&utm_cpc=0.2047
https://trkr.wildalaskancompany.com/de6a1678-c4c5-4e7f-87a7-332fe03ac1fd?site=nymagazine-dailyintelligencer&site_id=1038961&medium=native&platform=Desktop&campaign_id=2296914&campaign_item_id=2931377250&thumbnail=http://cdn.taboola.com/static/77/77e08919-f427-428f-84e4-9c36799390f0.png&click_id=GiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc&tblci=GiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc#tblciGiD7AyE88VpXo_hvujr7pegFkp-pq8MjQQXh5dBFWBfsXyD6_kc
What Happened When This Group Of Fishermen Noticed Something Strange On An Iceberg? | Xfreehub
BUT more importantly, his tax returns may be public, and we may find out whether he'll admit in legal document to owing Moscow and Bejing hundreds of millions.
The guy who demands an answer to posts like that?
Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
Can't wait to dance on your grave.I wouldn't trust you if you told me it's Wednesday assholeLiberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Trust me, I haven't wasted my time "lecturing" you on anything. It would go nowhere. I simply pointed out that in a grand observation about character, you tried to make it about politics.
And you just did it again, this time suggesting that a pejorative name for a political party somehow has some connection to personality traits.
It's obvious you're way out of your league here and have no function beyond infantile trolling. You have, or wish to appear to have, the intellectual capacity of a turnip.
QED.
BUH bye now. Good luck growing up, "66"-boi.
Lol only republicans are petty and childish enough to throw fits over what other people choose do with their genitals.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,483
- 27,633
- 2,615
Was the President right to shut down the economy last Spring?
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,850
- 2,250
Did the president shut down the economy last spring?
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,397
- 3,635
LOLOLOLOLLiberal please. Character? Character is a product of morals and ethics. Dim's have none of either. Don't lecture me on character.With the left, it sure isn't about reality.Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left if that had happened? Whoa Nellie!!!!
Ummmmmmmmm.... "the left"?
No no, not the obvious Composition Fallacy where "the left" is some kind of monolith organization, I mean far more basically..... you actually think this is about POLITICS?
With Composition Fallacies it never is.
Ever heard of "character"? Or do I need to drop another link to edumacate you on that as well?
Drools a Trump voter. Yes, Trump, as in the guy with 5 kids from three wives, upon all of whom he cheated. His latest, with a porn star, while his wife was at home with their newborn, he would later bribe to remain quiet. And she was just one of the women bribed for silence. None of whom were among the 27 women accusing him of sexual assault. Then there was the $25 million settlement to folks he screwed with his faux university. His struggles with telling the truth. But sure, g'head and lie to yourself about morals and ethics.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,483
- 27,633
- 2,615
We don't take 8 year olds seriously when they claim that they are really a girl when they have a penis.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,483
- 27,633
- 2,615
Oh now you're gonna play dumb. You can't have it both ways.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
WWI HD Colorization — Flying over the Western Front Battlefields, 1919- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 0
-
Biden Admin Accelerated White-Collar Job Transfers to Migrants Via Student Visa Programs- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 3
-
Runaway zebra on the loose in Tennessee captivates community
- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 1
-
-
Breaking News!!! Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—The American Party- Started by Luckyone
- Replies: 4
