Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[initforme]

"Living within your means" is akin to we have ours but we need you to sacrifice and have kids". Nope, not gonna fly.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

"Living within your means" is an epic fail. It is majorly unacceptable to ask young people to sacrifice

Wow, you call "Living within your means" (aka responsibility) as sacrifice? That is being spoiled and entitled. Here's a wakeup call; you're owed nothing. if someone else is successful, they likely just worked harder than you did. You're full of excuses and mere desires to be selfish. Any day you wake up is a blessing. Yet, all you can do is obsess over how unfair the world is. You need to go live in a 3rd world nation so you can appreciate the paradise you live in.. the one you seem to think is just so horrible.

 

[Leo123]

Just an observation, darling.

Darling? I understand why you’re attracted to me, but I like real women.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

"Living within your means" is akin to we have ours but we need you to sacrifice and have kids". Nope, not gonna fly.

A true leftist... you think kids are merely a burden. Kids are blessings to their parents and their society. It's as if you don't care about the human race, and just care about your immediate desires. That's pathetic, and nothing to be proud of. You actually ought to be ashamed.

Again, go find a cave to live in. The only reason you're living this safe, fluffy life is because of those who do sacrifice and have children. You ought to have some appreciation.

 

[initforme]

Wow, you call "Living within your means" (aka responsibility) as sacrifice? That is being spoiled and entitled. Here's a wakeup call; you're owed nothing. if someone else is successful, they likely just worked harder than you did. You're full of excuses and mere desires to be selfish.

No problem. I dont think anyone is owed anything. In fact, less young people marrying and having kids IS being responsible. Dont have kids you cant afgord right? You have what you desire. Waiting until MUCH later in life to get married is what is now needed.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Epic fail. As a christian male i say. ...try again. Bunch of bunk.

"Christian Male"? Your ideology thus far is completely secular humanist and left-wing.

 

[initforme]

A true leftist... you think kids are a burden. It's as if you don't care about the human race, and just care about your immediate desires. That's pathetic, and nothing to be proud of. You actually ought to be ashamed.

Kids cost $. Its reality. So waiting until one is financially secure is being responsible. Im very very proud of that. Ashamed? For advocating for personal responsibility? Ok yeah sure. Whatever. Too funny.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

No problem. I dont think anyone is owed anything. In fact, less young people marrying and having kids IS being responsible. Dont have kids you cant afgord right? You have what you desire. Waiting until MUCH later in life to get married is what is now needed.

You can't social engineer attraction. Waiting until later in life to marry generally doesn't work too well. marriages fail at far greater rates, and older women can't accept the fact that they've aged and fallen in value.

Sounds like an idea on paper, but it doesn't work.

 

[initforme]

"Christian Male"? Your ideology thus far is completely secular humanist and left-wing.

Not at all. Im for being responsible. Im an active christian. Just stating reality not ideology.

 

[Leo123]

We have a poster talking aboutvwhy women suck and can't do anythingvwithout men and somehow I am the hysterical one?

Yes, women often become hysterical at inconvenient truths, like when you confront them with the truth that most of them would lose in a fight with most any man..

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Not at all. Im for being responsible. Im an active christian. Just stating reality not ideology.

How can you be a Christian and be so against families, marriage, children, and duties?

I guess if you're in a new-age super church, and outside the Catholic Church, It wouldn't suprise me that they can produce these types.

 

[initforme]

You can't social engineer attraction. Waiting until later in life to marry generally doesn't work too well. marriages fail at far greater rates, and older women can't accept the fact that they've aged and fallen in value.

Sounds like an idea on paper, but it doesn't work.

It costs $$ to have a family. You dont even consider that. And the fact that more and more young people are waiting until later means finances are first and foremost. Its called being responsible.

 

[initforme]

How can you be a Christian and be so against families, marriage, children, and duties?

I guess if you're in a new-age super church, and outside the Catholic Church, It wouldn't suprise me that they can produce these types.

Epic fail. Im for families. But you believe that it it is fine to have a family and cant afford it. Sorty but youre losing on this one. And the growing number of people holding off until later to think about marriage prove it. People live according to what they can afford.

 

[initforme]

You can't social engineer attraction. Waiting until later in life to marry generally doesn't work too well. marriages fail at far greater rates, and older women can't accept the fact that they've aged and fallen in value.

Sounds like an idea on paper, but it doesn't work.

Marriages fail at higher rates when they are in their 20s. The 30s benefits a nation.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

It costs $$ to have a family. You dont even consider that. And the fact that more and more young people are waiting until later means finances are first and foremost. Its called being responsible.

Again, you can't force broke attractive young women to be attracted to broke young men.
You can't force successful men to be desiring to marry 35+ women.

So, this "we'll all wait" thing is a just a pipe dream. It only ensures less marriage, which is bad for society.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Marriages fail at higher rates when they are in their 20s. The 30s benefits a nation.

I'll need that cited. I'm quite certain you just made it up, because it's completely backwards.

 

[initforme]

Again, you can't force broke attractive young women to be attracted to broke young men.
You can't force successful men to be desiring to marry 35+ women.

So, this "we'll all wait" thing is a just a pipe dream. It only ensures less marriage, which is bad for society.

Good luck. You cant fix it.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

But you believe that it it is fine to have a family and cant afford it.

Well, this line from you doesn't mean anything because you call "living within your means" as some unfair sacrifice. So, "afford" isn't a word you can use accurately.

Sorty but youre losing on this one.

Says who.. you? LOL

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Good luck. You cant fix it.

We can fight for social pressures onto the populace, and push for celebrating young marriage, chaste cooperative women, loyal competent men, children as the ultimate blessing... those sorts of things that would be good for society (and the things you oppose)

 

[initforme]

Well, this line from you doesn't mean anything because you call "living within your means" as some unfair sacrifice. So, "afford" isn't a word you can use accurately.

Says who.. you?

Theres the "living within yours means" garbage. People are living within their means. If they dont want kids thats their choice. I support them either way. Dont think you can afgord them thrn a GRzEAT choice not to have them until you can.