Is China Bluffing this time?

HenryBHough

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
33,412
8,915
1,340
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
Looking bleak for Taiwan!

Biggest Chinese incursion ever into Taiwan's air space came down today:


The incursion included both high-tech fighters and nuclear-capable bombers.

Is this a bluff? Or a response to Xiden's tepid words of support for the tiny nation?

If this continues will Xiden weasel on his pro-Taiwan (though stumbling) statements?

Or will he bring on World War III to "fix" the economy he has broken in record time?
 
There is a suggestion that Russia and China are coordinating attacks to occur at the same time. Russia will invade Ukraine and China Taiwan.
 
Looking bleak for Taiwan!

Biggest Chinese incursion ever into Taiwan's air space came down today:


The incursion included both high-tech fighters and nuclear-capable bombers.

Is this a bluff? Or a response to Xiden's tepid words of support for the tiny nation?

If this continues will Xiden weasel on his pro-Taiwan (though stumbling) statements?

Or will he bring on World War III to "fix" the economy he has broken in record time?

They will continue to run these, until one day they just attack for real. They know America and the West will drag their feet and try and find a "non-military" response, because corporations will not allow any confrontation of China and their cheap, near slave labour.

If the West were serious, after they walked into Hong Kong they would have immediately have boycotted the Winter Olympics and force China to withdraw. They didn't, because the corporations have decided this outcome.

We have set on course the ultimate outcome. Kudos to the CCP for playing hardball and having a plan, they know how to roll over the weak and the woke.
 
Looking bleak for Taiwan!

Biggest Chinese incursion ever into Taiwan's air space came down today:


The incursion included both high-tech fighters and nuclear-capable bombers.

Is this a bluff? Or a response to Xiden's tepid words of support for the tiny nation?

If this continues will Xiden weasel on his pro-Taiwan (though stumbling) statements?

Or will he bring on World War III to "fix" the economy he has broken in record time?

They will continue to run these, until one day they just attack for real. They know America and the West will drag their feet and try and find a "non-military" response, because corporations will not allow any confrontation of China and their cheap, near slave labour.

If the West were serious, after they walked into Hong Kong they would have immediately have boycotted the Winter Olympics and force China to withdraw. They didn't, because the corporations have decided this outcome.

We have set on course the ultimate outcome. Kudos to the CCP for playing hardball and having a plan, they know how to roll over the weak and the woke.
They walked into hong kong because it belonged to them.
In 1898, UK leased Hong Kong for 99 years.
So in 1997, the UK simply handed it over when the lease expired.

There aint no conflict of interest towards China:

 
Looking bleak for Taiwan!

Biggest Chinese incursion ever into Taiwan's air space came down today:


The incursion included both high-tech fighters and nuclear-capable bombers.

Is this a bluff? Or a response to Xiden's tepid words of support for the tiny nation?

If this continues will Xiden weasel on his pro-Taiwan (though stumbling) statements?

Or will he bring on World War III to "fix" the economy he has broken in record time?

They will continue to run these, until one day they just attack for real. They know America and the West will drag their feet and try and find a "non-military" response, because corporations will not allow any confrontation of China and their cheap, near slave labour.

If the West were serious, after they walked into Hong Kong they would have immediately have boycotted the Winter Olympics and force China to withdraw. They didn't, because the corporations have decided this outcome.

We have set on course the ultimate outcome. Kudos to the CCP for playing hardball and having a plan, they know how to roll over the weak and the woke.
They walked into hong kong because it belonged to them.
In 1898, UK leased Hong Kong for 99 years.
So in 1997, the UK simply handed it over when the lease expired.

There aint no conflict of interest towards China:


I have corrected many of you so often on this. They violated the Sino-British Agreement.

Yes, England gave HK back to China two years early, with an agreement with China that Hong Kong would remain independent and sovereign until 2047, a la the B.S "one China, two systems" the Communists like to suggest about Taiwan.

Instead, they went in and essentially violated all of this and have erased the Democratic Party efforts and ability for citizens to speak freely, protest, have open media etc.

It was a blatant smack in the face: "we are taking HK what are you going to do about it Western nations? Nothing? Thought so".

When is the world going to learn, like most socialists, the Chinese government never keep their word.


“As of today, ‘one country, two systems’ no longer exists,” one of the expelled lawmakers, Kwok Ka-ki, said Wednesday.

The Sino-British Declaration of 1984 set the terms of the British handover of Hong Kong in 1997. The treaty rested on Beijing’s promise that Hong Kong “would enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defense affairs,” and that "the laws currently in force in Hong Kong will remain basically unchanged” until 2047.
 



Clinton Approves Technology Transfer to China

China's American Arsenal

For instance, here's the Shenyang J-31, China's fifth generation stealth fighter:
ADdPNihJzmPcaitgzeGELoFThJAHsVJ6yWQnzxPVc4DkeoHRFgbbGNF71YAkfV5MQ3Uv52CYRf3fGAEnfwBpZxAS2


And here's the good ol' Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II:
hgjbks2vRxvp3qu9XRUDtP8pprk1TqtVNQp22oUHFjDHfqHU3omgEpmFXNa3irvD2hxDEkHwhpvjsuiuJmQY7pW3MY


Or compare the Chinese Lijian Sharp Sword Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle:
MG5aEqKFcQiBEm1JreuiuyofpQ9AnuhhbRY66VciZu22wtGA9Jb52fsxC4EojRnwt9TGwp2MbxF15Np2PseKSRmmuVkUz5CTg



To the Northrop Grumman X-47B Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle:
ADdPNihJzmPcaitgzeGELoFThJAHsVJ6yWQnzxPVc4DkeoHRFgbbGNF71YAkfV5MQ3Uv52CYRf3fGANVCJH6vkBBL



Or take the Sunward SVU-200 Flying Tiger unmanned helo:
EfcLDDAkyqguXw9VbV7dgBAhvE6oV3wcnABRPr2FHnpPUvR2Uqp2CPcbpuj9MkNeBhQjqbyW7cdvgg5u4LYAqwJ94AKEN



And play a game of "spot the similarities" with Northrop Grumman's very own MQ-8 Fire Scout unmanned helo:
ADdPNihJzmPcaitgzeGELoFThJAHsVJ6yWQnzxPVc4DkeoHRFgbbGNF71YAkfV5MQ3Uv52CYRf3fGAFK92Z54Rqb4
 
Looking bleak for Taiwan!

Biggest Chinese incursion ever into Taiwan's air space came down today:


The incursion included both high-tech fighters and nuclear-capable bombers.

Is this a bluff? Or a response to Xiden's tepid words of support for the tiny nation?

If this continues will Xiden weasel on his pro-Taiwan (though stumbling) statements?

Or will he bring on World War III to "fix" the economy he has broken in record time?

They will continue to run these, until one day they just attack for real. They know America and the West will drag their feet and try and find a "non-military" response, because corporations will not allow any confrontation of China and their cheap, near slave labour.

If the West were serious, after they walked into Hong Kong they would have immediately have boycotted the Winter Olympics and force China to withdraw. They didn't, because the corporations have decided this outcome.

We have set on course the ultimate outcome. Kudos to the CCP for playing hardball and having a plan, they know how to roll over the weak and the woke.
They walked into hong kong because it belonged to them.
In 1898, UK leased Hong Kong for 99 years.
So in 1997, the UK simply handed it over when the lease expired.

There aint no conflict of interest towards China:


I have corrected many of you so often on this. They violated the Sino-British Agreement.

Yes, England gave HK back to China two years early, with an agreement with China that Hong Kong would remain independent and sovereign until 2047, a la the B.S "one China, two systems" the Communists like to suggest about Taiwan.

Instead, they went in and essentially violated all of this and have erased the Democratic Party efforts and ability for citizens to speak freely, protest, have open media etc.

It was a blatant smack in the face: "we are taking HK what are you going to do about it Western nations? Nothing? Thought so".

When is the world going to learn, like most socialists, the Chinese government never keep their word.


“As of today, ‘one country, two systems’ no longer exists,” one of the expelled lawmakers, Kwok Ka-ki, said Wednesday.

The Sino-British Declaration of 1984 set the terms of the British handover of Hong Kong in 1997. The treaty rested on Beijing’s promise that Hong Kong “would enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defense affairs,” and that "the laws currently in force in Hong Kong will remain basically unchanged” until 2047.
Now you know how voters in Georgia feel after republican voting restrictions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top