Is Braggs stretching it with a felony?

[WorldWatcher]

But you clowns claim Bragg is using a federal crime Trump has never been charged with to elevate dead misdemeanors to felonies.

And you are too stupid to see how ludicrous your theory is.

Section 175.10 does not require that Trump be the one that committed the crime. You know he can aid and conceal the crimes of another right?

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Cohen wasn't convicted of anything. He cut a plea deal.

He pled guilty to the charge, was convicted, and went to prison for it.

WW

 

[Nostra]

Section 175.10 does not require that Trump be the one that committed the crime. You know he can aid and conceal the crimes of another right?

WW

To elevate a misdemeanor to a felony the “prosecutors must establish that your intent to defraud involved further criminal intent to either hide the commission of another crime or to assist in the commission of that other crime”

How the hell can Bragg do that when he can’t even cite the other criminal statute, Simp?

 

[WorldWatcher]

To elevate a misdemeanor to a felony the “prosecutors must establish that your intent to defraud involved further criminal intent to either hide the commission of another crime or to assist in the commission of that other crime”

How the hell can Bragg do that when he can’t even cite the other criminal statute, Simp?

What makes you think he can't cite the statutes that Cohen was charged with?

Not willing to layout his courtroom case to the public is not "he can't cite".

WW

 

[Nostra]

What makes you think he can't cite the statutes that Cohen was charged with?

Not willing to layout his courtroom case to the public is not "he can't cite".

WW

It is routine practice to not only cite the other crime, but charge it.

Bragg hasn’t been able to do either, Simp.

 

[WorldWatcher]

It is routine practice to not only cite the other crime, but charge it.

Bragg hasn’t been able to do either, Simp.

Cohen was charged and convicted.

WW

 

[Nostra]

Cohen was charged and convicted.

WW

So? Bragg isn’t going after Cohen, Simp.

 

[Faun]

Trump can pay whoever he wants, whatever he wants to, with his own money. Spending your own money is "free speech".
I already explained that campaign expenses are directly related to the campaign, like campaign staff and political advertising.

Sure he could. But Cohen could not. And Trump could not help conceal Cohen's crime by falsifying business records.

 

[Faun]

Cohen did not contribute to the Trump campaign, he paid hush money with his own money, and then paid himself back with Trump's own money.
Not campaign related, no campaign funds used.

Cohen was literally convicted for contributing to Trump's campaign.

 

[WorldWatcher]

So? Bragg isn’t going after Cohen, Simp.

Correct. Trump was indicted under Section 175.10 for falsification of records to aid and conceal Cohen's crime. Bragg isn't charging Cohen with campaign finance violations because Cohen was already convicted.

I think you are starting to get it.

WW

 

[Nostra]

Correct. Trump was indicted under Section 175.10 for falsification of records to aid and conceal Cohen's crime. Bragg isn't charging Cohen with campaign finance violations because Cohen was already convicted.

I think you are starting to get it.

WW

Bragg has not made that claim, Simp.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bragg has not made that claim, Simp.

That Trump was being charged under Section 175.10? Sure he did, it's in the indictment.

That Cohen was charged and convicted? Sure he did, it's in the Statement of Facts.

WW

 

[Faun]

Then he wasn’t convicted. He looked at the various options available and decided that pleading guilty was his best bet.

A case brought by a biased DA that will derail the presidential ambitions of the OPPOSING side should be clear-cut….not this vague gobbely-gook. All this time for Bragg to “get his target,” as promised in his campaign, and this is the best he can come up with?

Moron, pleading guilty to a crime IS a conviction.

Pros and Cons of Pleading Guilty vs. Taking Your Criminal Case to Trial

Should you plead guilty or take your criminal case to a jury trial? Here, we explain the pros and cons of entering a guilty plea vs. going to trial.

www.tkevinwilsonlawyer.com

Conviction. You will be convicted of committing the crime when you plead guilty.​

 

[Faun]

Two democrats said it was a violation, 4 non-democrats said it wasn't.
I have not seen ANY democrats from the FEC explain why they think campaign finance law was broken.

False. Two non-Democrats said it wasn't. Two others recused themselves.

It ended in a 2-2 tie.

 

[Nostra]

Has any NY DA ever elevated a dead misdemeanor to a felony based on a federal crime committed by someone other than the accused?

Lets see your links.

 

[Faun]

So? Bragg has no jurisdiction over FEDERAL Issues, Simp.

No one said he does, Dumbfuck.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Two democrats said it was a violation, 4 non-democrats said it wasn't.
I have not seen ANY democrats from the FEC explain why they think campaign finance law was broken.

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7784/7784_43.pdf

WW

 

[Faun]

Cohen wasn't convicted of anything. He cut a plea deal.

A guilty plea results in a conviction.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bragg has not made that claim, Simp.

That Trump was charged under Section 175.10? Sure did, it's in the indictment.

That Cohen was convicted? Sure did. It's in the Statement of Facts.

.
.
.
.

WW

 

[scruffy]

.You have it backwards. Falsifying business records becomes a felony if it is committed in connection to another crime regardless of whether that crime is a misdemeanor or a felony. The second crime being committed makes the original misdemeanor of felony.

There is no original crime.