Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
I have no argument "with Iceland" and what I said was fine.Guess you’ll take it up with Iceland. They “ must” be lying ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no argument "with Iceland" and what I said was fine.Guess you’ll take it up with Iceland. They “ must” be lying ?
Not true, but it is confusing:
True, "Iceland is" not "the only place where all power comes from geothermal."
True, (see above) all of its grid electricity comes from renewables.
So:
True, "Iceland is the only place where all electrical grid power comes from"geothermalrenewables.
So:
True, "85% of the total primary energy supply in Iceland is" renewables.
True, "Most of Iceland's renewables" arehydrogeothermal.
True, energy may be supplied as electricity or thermally. Directly through steam, water, or air. Indirectly through heat exchange of any sort.
Recapping the main point just to be crystal, in 2016 anyway:
15% of "primary energy supply in Iceland" came from fossil fuels. Out of 85% left "the share of hydropower was 20%" while "Geothermal energy provided about 65%".
As long as you define “ fine” as incorrect. Iceland uses hydropower to produce MOST of its electricity.I have no argument "with Iceland" and what I said was fine.
Quote me saying otherwise. "Renewables" means energy such as heat (thermal), not just "electricity."As long as you define “ fine” as incorrect. Iceland uses hydropower to produce MOST of its electricity.
There are 6 basic forms of energy:
- Mechanical energy
- Chemical energy
- Thermal or heat energy
- Electrical energy
- Nuclear energy
- Radiation
Unlike the annual $10 billion or so fossil fuels have been receiving for decades.
You’re funny…..stupid, but funny. Let’s see, according you Humpers, it’s a fraud, now it’s a trend. So, according to you, everyone is investing in renewables, not because they work, but because it’s a trend. What a dip shit.
Don’t be ridiculous..of course they do. They have for a long time. You can’t even look it up ? They get direct subsidies ( payments) and indirect in the form of tax breaks….they are still called subsidies. Dumbo, the state and feds also subsidize EVs made in America in the form of tax breaks. They are still call subsidies…dah.
You need to actually read the article. They're talking worldwide and not just including explicit subsidies but tax breaks and the costs of environmental damage.
It’s OK.Quote me saying otherwise. "Renewables" means energy such as heat (thermal), not just "electricity."
eta:
You’ve been adamant about geothermal providing MOST of the renewables energy. It doesn’t .Quote me saying otherwise. "Renewables" means energy such as heat (thermal), not just "electricity."
eta:
Apparently not.It’s OK.
You've been adamant. I've been calm. Me:You’ve been adamant about geothermal providing MOST of the renewables energy. It doesn’t .
I linked and quoted Wikipedia backing me up. Iceland agrees:True, "Most of Iceland's renewables" arehydrogeothermal.
Your Forbes article agrees with me. Your Statista link deals solely with electrical power generation.Geothermal sources announct{sic} for 66% of Iceland's primary energy use.
Virtually means, nearly, almost. So, what I said is correct, doofus. almost all ,nearly all, of Iceland's power comes from thermal.Even that’s wrong.
that conversation applied only to Iceland, it is accurate as to that island country only. But on that topic. how many windmills; dams, and solar farms would be needed to provide the power needs of the USA?You’ve been adamant about geothermal providing MOST of the renewables energy. It doesn’t .
I stand corrected iceland power generation - BingVirtually means, nearly, almost. So, what I said is correct, doofus. almost all ,nearly all, of Iceland's power comes from thermal.
No, you should not. THIRTY percent of Iceland's power is produced from geothermal sources.my error, should have said virtually all. happy now?
Additionally, virtually all of Iceland's energy comes from renewables as opposed to fossil fuel sources. Yes, most of their electricity comes from renewable hydroelectric. However, most of that goes to smelt aluminum, not toward heating or powering citizen's homes.No, you should not. THIRTY percent of Iceland's power is produced from geothermal sources.
Iceland's consumption of electricity per capita was seven times higher than EU 15 average in 2008. The majority of the electricity is sold to industrial users, mainly aluminium smelters and producers of ferroalloy. The aluminum industry in Iceland used up to 70% of produced electricity in 2013.[2]
Forget hydroelectric for starters:that conversation applied only to Iceland, it is accurate as to that island country only. But on that topic. how many windmills; dams, and solar farms would be needed to provide the power needs of the USA?
Forget hydroelectric for starters:
![]()
Solar power could replace all US hydro dams using ‘just 13% of the space’
Banks of solar panels would be able to replace every electricity-producing dam in the US using just 13% of the space, according to a new study. The researchers say this “surprisingly modest” figure provides a “tantalising” vision of what could be achieved if the nation phased out a power source...www.carbonbrief.org
Nope. It comes from hydro. I had a reference, no one else did. We are talking about power generation as o 2022, not 2016. That’s old shit.Virtually means, nearly, almost. So, what I said is correct, doofus. almost all ,nearly all, of Iceland's power comes from thermal.
ha haApparently not.
You've been adamant. I've been calm. Me:
I linked and quoted Wikipedia backing me up. Iceland agrees:
Your Forbes article agrees with me. Your Statista link deals solely with electrical power generation.
Iceland's electricity is produced almost entirely from renewable energy sources:Apparently not.
You've been adamant. I've been calm. Me:
I linked and quoted Wikipedia backing me up. Iceland agrees:
Your Forbes article agrees with me. Your Statista link deals solely with electrical power generation.
the government of Iceland.Apparently not.
You've been adamant. I've been calm. Me:
I linked and quoted Wikipedia backing me up. Iceland agrees:
Your Forbes article agrees with me. Your Statista link deals solely with electrical power generation.
Nothing has changed. You’re an asshole.I stand corrected iceland power generation - Bing
But that does not change the fact that Dagosa is a raving lunatic