IRS Investigating The Scourge Of Hollywood

[Jarhead]

Your points are meaningless.

You're a partisan who hopes for the scandal to be some deeply sophisticated web of deceit coming directly from the Whitehouse.

You hope it came Directly from Obama, and you won't admit it. There's no point in going through "point by point" and niceities with brainwashed people such as yourself. You're a cynical partisan douche, just like the rest.

Independents are the future. Not sycophants.

Point by point?

LMAO.

Pretty ******* simple...

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

Too complicated for ya?

 

[Jarhead]

It's a bit more sophisticated than "they are conservative so they were persecuted!"

But you have to be somewhat intelligent to understand that.

Well then, if you need someone to explain it to you, let me know.

 

[Jarhead]

Your points are meaningless.

You're a partisan who hopes for the scandal to be some deeply sophisticated web of deceit coming directly from the Whitehouse.

You hope it came Directly from Obama, and you won't admit it. There's no point in going through "point by point" and niceities with brainwashed people such as yourself. You're a cynical partisan douche, just like the rest.

Independents are the future. Not sycophants.

Point by point?

LMAO.

Pretty ******* simple...

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

Too complicated for ya?

Is Citizens United too complicated for you, or no?

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

Enough said.

Oh wait...

AND NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHY

 

[The Rabbi]

yet you refuse to address the issue:

IRS suggested time for an approval....NO MORE THAN 3 months

progressive groups....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups 6 months to 3 years

Too much for you to handle? Can't respond because Mr. Obama did not give you the words to respond with?

Instead ignore it and call me names?

Exactly what he expected of you.

You made it way too complicated for him to understand.

He was told it was a phony scandal and that was all he needed to hear.

The fo9lks at the hearing were phonies as well.

And then, of course, if those facts are thrown at him, he has the right to call you names and hope you go away.

He is a spineless "independent" with his lips wrapped around Obamas dick.

Have you noticed everyone who claims to be an independent is the same. They all support Obama against the GOP. The only exception are the libertarians.

 

[Jarhead]

Is Citizens United too complicated for you, or no?

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

Enough said.

Oh wait...

AND NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHY

No, you're wrong.

They explained why.

And if you didn't catch that, then you didn't look into the opposite "side" of the issue you're laying judgment upon. Hack. It's not my job to educate the elderly cynics who think their partisan ideology is the way of the world and everyone else is naïve.

LMAO.

Back to the name calling as a response.

No explanation at all....other than childish excuses that they new the Obama followers would believe.....LIKE YOU DID.

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

Enough said.

 

[Jarhead]

He was told it was a phony scandal and that was all he needed to hear.

The fo9lks at the hearing were phonies as well.

And then, of course, if those facts are thrown at him, he has the right to call you names and hope you go away.

He is a spineless "independent" with his lips wrapped around Obamas dick.

Have you noticed everyone who claims to be an independent is the same. They all support Obama against the GOP. The only exception are the libertarians.

They do?

You haven't seen my threads on guns, healthcare, corporatocracy, etc.


You're just one of those dopes who, when disagreed with, puts everyone in a box: "the left!!!"

and you are aware that I am not against abortion rights and gay marriage.

But that doesn't stop you from calling me a right wing hack.

So there goes your defense my man.

 

[Jarhead]

and of course, still no defense for labeling it a phony scandal.

You simply parroted what they expected you to parrot.

IRS suggests no more than 3 months

Progressive groups.....3 weeks to 3 months

Conservative groups....6 months to 3 years.

And all you can say is "phony scandal"

 

[Jarhead]

They do?

You haven't seen my threads on guns, healthcare, corporatocracy, etc.


You're just one of those dopes who, when disagreed with, puts everyone in a box: "the left!!!"

and you are aware that I am not against abortion rights and gay marriage.

But that doesn't stop you from calling me a right wing hack.

So there goes your defense my man.

You ARE a hack, is why I call you a hack.

You make comments about vacations and shit like that. The small petty shit only partisan hacks care about.

lol....

Whatever floats your ******* boat.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Speaking of coinkydinkies:

Conservative commentator, author Dinesh D?Souza indicted ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

I am SURE that the neutral IRS engaged in NO political witch hunting here.

It is JUST a coinkydinky that Dinesh happened to have made a movie HIGHLY critical of the Obamessiah.

Nothing to see here. Or here.

Move along.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

And now, HEEEERRRRREEEEE's the Dinesh D'Souza Indictment:

http://images.politico.com/global/2014/01/23/dsouza.html

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Speaking of coinkydinkies:

Conservative commentator, author Dinesh D?Souza indicted ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

I am SURE that the neutral IRS engaged in NO political witch hunting here.

It is JUST a coinkydinky that Dinesh happened to have made a movie HIGHLY critical of the Obamessiah.

Nothing to see here. Or here.

Move along.

Right and if he broke the law?

If he did?

Then he did.

And I'm SURE that the prosecution is simply a matter of even handed fair impartial justice.

Why, it's all blind and shit, you know.

You see, there's more to this than the simple question of whether or not he did it. Put aside the presumption of innocence for a second. The bigger question is why would his alleged multiple contributions have become a FOCUS for IRS and DOJ Scrutiny?

Could we be bearing witness to some of that "selective prosecution" stuff we've heard so much about?

Someone else already noted it, but it bears repeating:

When Fast and Furious needs some investigation, our beloved (and law-abiding, dutiful and concerned) AG asks the President to invoke ******* Executive Privilege to COVER it UP! And the Obamessiah dutifully DOES as asked. But when a conservative who has been notably critical of The ONE arguably violates some Election LAW, THAT requires the fair and impartial (and did I mention "fair?") AG to LET LOOSE the DOGS!