No, actually it was both. The complaint was both.
The BOLA list was unethical.
If you have no percentages and with your 3 months 3 years, etc. bullshit, then you're not saying anything. There's a good place to start.
The tea party groups were being more heavily scrutinized because common sense was dictating that their mere existence was political in nature. It's not that hard, do you really need to think harder about it, or......?
There was no uptick of Progressive applications, the name progressive also was historical in nature as a precedent. Therefore, it was "business as usual" for these applicants.
And a few of the gentlemen who testified that it took the irs too long? Were found to have been withholding information.
There's no point in discussing this with someone with a preconceived conclusion and axe to grind. It's futile, your brain doesn't operate the same way that it would if you were judging something you're more objective about like - maybe sex toys. Creep.
what the hell is your issue with sex GT?
Strop acting like a child.
MY issue with sex?
C'mon. Even you know you have to laugh at that one bud.