Iran is the worst threat to the world, in all of history

Do you like Chuck Schumer? Debbie Wasserman Schultz? Karl Marx? Mark Zuckerberg? Be honest now.
/----/ I have nothing against them personally because of their religion. It is their politics. My personal friends Ira, Michael, and David and their wives are Jewish. We get along great.

As a Catholic, I'm against the 150 members of Congress identifying as Catholic who are pro-abortion, anti-2nd Amendment, and want open borders. They account for approximately 28% of the legislative body. This includes 126 members in the House and 24 members in the Senate. The majority of these Catholics are Democrats, with 70 in the House and 13 in the Senate. Additionally, there are 56 Catholic Republicans in the House and 11 in the Senate.

Finally, I resent your implication that I have to be told to be honest. I say what I mean and mean what I say.
 
In all of history no government, tribe, or group of any kind has ever been as much of a threat to the entire world as is Iran. We're talking about people whose goal is to SPREAD their ideology (masquerading as a religion), to the point of complete world domination. Where every person would be a Muslim.

With the possession of nuclear weapons these lunatics could eventually kill all of the 6.3 Billion non-Muslims in the world.

Would it matter if Iran (the IRGC) was "moments" away from having nuclear bombs, or if in 6 or 8 months, they could have them ? Either scenario is reason enough to attack Iran's capability to produce nukes, and that would be even if regime change occurs.

There is really nothing that says the Iranian civilian sector could not produce these nukes, and use them against the USA, completely outside of the Iranian government.

People who say Iran is not a threat, are the world's biggest fools.




Allah is not real. Jesus is real.

When you click the site, it takes you straight to YouTube.

This woman was married to a Muslim Imam. After her life was restored by Jesus, she and her husband had a massive falling out. She told him she can't follow Allah and follows Jesus, so he disowned her.
Even for Christians this site is well worth viewing.
 
Last edited:
Use your brain goddamn, holy shit. Iran doesn't have a military or the popular support to take over the world and convert everybody. The Iranian government isn't even popular with its own people they couldn't press millions into spreading ideology and political systems they oppose.
/---/ They would with nuclear weapons and sleeper cells worldwide. Look at the damage they are causing even on the brink of defeat.
 
/---/ They would with nuclear weapons and sleeper cells worldwide. Look at the damage they are causing even on the brink of defeat.

They are taking over the world and world's population is converting en masse? Sleeper cells are going to put the world under Iranian rule? Iran's would drop a nuke and everyone would shrug and say they should be in charge? Look at the OP and how divorced from reality it is. Try living in reality.
 
They are taking over the world and world's population is converting en masse? Sleeper cells are going to put the world under Iranian rule? Iran's would drop a nuke and everyone would shrug and say they should be in charge? Look at the OP and how divorced from reality it is. Try living in reality.
/------/ No one is converting en masse. Stupid question. Secondly, the purpose of sleeper cells is to cause death and destruction. Period.
Your final question is completely idiotic. No one is saying that but you. Pure hyperbole.
 
Depending on the school, I am 2 to 4 classes away from a degree in history.

You've never even seen real history, if you think that crap is it.

It would be fun to take you to a University library, pull a journal at random, open to a page at random, and watch you try to read it.
In College, the Student Lives Like a Child. That's Why He Graduates with the Mind of a Child.

The Eweniversities house the biggest collection of children's fairy tales in the country.
 
Iran declared war on the United States 47 years ago. Arguably, it is the longest-running irregular conflict against America in its history. Ayatollah's regime founded Hezbollah, the Houthis, and various other proxies responsible for assassinating American military personnel and civilians. The "war" to which you refer is not the beginning of an endless conflict. It is precisely the opposite. It is the use of force to neutralize an enemy that is determined to destroy the United States.
Attacking our embassy was an act of war
Since we had shoved a brutal dictator down their throat, there are what one might call extenuating circumstances to the embassy attack.

The simple truth is Obama started us down the road to normalising relations. That takes time, but it was working.

Iran didn't break relations, Trump did, and after that, he attacked twice, both times during negotiations.

Fact of the matter is, we are worse off now than before the attack. On top of that, overthrowing the regime would cost roughly a trillion bucks. Bombing doesn't do that.

It wasn't an 'endless conflict' before Trump. But it's going to take time before they are willing to negotiate.
 
/----/ I have nothing against them personally because of their religion. It is their politics. My personal friends Ira, Michael, and David and their wives are Jewish. We get along great.

As a Catholic, I'm against the 150 members of Congress identifying as Catholic who are pro-abortion, anti-2nd Amendment, and want open borders. They account for approximately 28% of the legislative body. This includes 126 members in the House and 24 members in the Senate. The majority of these Catholics are Democrats, with 70 in the House and 13 in the Senate. Additionally, there are 56 Catholic Republicans in the House and 11 in the Senate.

Finally, I resent your implication that I have to be told to be honest. I say what I mean and mean what I say.
So you're a Catholic hater?

The point actually being: You are allowed to disagree with an ideology or religion without being "antisemitic" or "anti-Catholicism."

By the way, Karl Marx was the author of the Communist Manifesto and was an atheist. What do you think of that? Are you a fan of his?
 
So you're a Catholic hater?

The point actually being: You are allowed to disagree with an ideology or religion without being "antisemitic" or "anti-Catholicism."

By the way, Karl Marx was the author of the Communist Manifesto and was an atheist. What do you think of that? Are you a fan of his?
/—-/ No I’m not a Catholic hater. What a childish comment.
 
/—-/ No I’m not a Catholic hater. What a childish comment.
Well I'm happy you matured in such a short amount time and have come to realize "disagreement" is not synonymous with "hate." That's a step in the right directions. Kudos to you.
 
Since we had shoved a brutal dictator down their throat, there are what one might call extenuating circumstances to the embassy attack.

The simple truth is Obama started us down the road to normalising relations. That takes time, but it was working.

Iran didn't break relations, Trump did, and after that, he attacked twice, both times during negotiations.

Fact of the matter is, we are worse off now than before the attack. On top of that, overthrowing the regime would cost roughly a trillion bucks. Bombing doesn't do that.

It wasn't an 'endless conflict' before Trump. But it's going to take time before they are willing to negotiate.
Acadhimmia

Did Dr. Seuss write your Current Affairs textbook?
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom