Hmpf....
Whatever I might think about the current Iranian goverment, there are some facts which shold be considered:
1. Even with a revolutionary government, Iran had no expansion policy. Even historically Iran can be considered as saturated.
2. The strategic position of Iran is uncomfortable. In the east are the Afghan troubles, an instable Pakistan (with nukes) and western troops, mostly unfriendly US troops. In the west are also US troops in Iraq and a country close on a breakdown. North are the Turks, also a NATO state. As Iran´s government supports forces of terror (or freedom fighters in their understanding), Israel is an enemy as well.
Also, as Iran´s coast is along the Persian Gulf, the strategic important oil route, they must live with a lot of unfriendly navy forces in these waters. (Simply think of Chinese or Brazilian carrier groups in the Gulf of Mexico. Stupid idea ? Let´s talk in 25 years again.).
So, as a chief of staff in Iran I would feel very uncomfortable.
3. The Iranians, at least the ones I know, are very patriotc.Most men of my age have fought against Iraq. When Chomenei ordered them, after driving the Iraquis back, to march on Baghdad, they did not so. Whatever there is behind this story:
Iran is not an expansive.
4. Iran is one of the oldest cultures in the world. They consider themselves as heirs to the Persians, so their culture is much older than i.e. France.
This means they have a long memory. Iran in the last 150 has always been a playground of the superpowers. That the CIA staged a coup to bring down an Iranian PM in the fifties, so US politics do not necessarily have much friends.
Quite understandable. If Canada would have brought down Kennedy with help of it´s secret service, not much people in the US would like Canada.
To sum it up:
The Iranian government has more than a doubtful role and about it`s legitimation one might easily have more than doubts.
Still: it will be helpful to try to understand Irans position.
And:
I doubt that their army is that good, as the starter of this thread said.
But in case they will fight. Perhaps not well-led, but they will make a stand and all of them.
They remember the war against Iraq as something they did alone, against an Iraq supported by all major powers. So they know they can do this.
Still, most of the things said in this thread is kind of dick-size comparision.
Face it: if Israel or the US attack Iran, they will try their outmost to fight back, with whatever there is available. So why not start to negotiate in earnest before people get hurt.
regards
ze germanguy