Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Was your comparison literally one other election?Well, I’ll concede this one. But when compared to Obama’s record setter in 2008 it’s still quite a stretch.
Mail in and corruption threw this election toward Biden. Any American would demand an audit for fear of losing the country. But it appears it’s too late. Demmunists have overthrown the US.
Yes. I can easily believe Putin is quite happy to be rid of Trump in exchange for a feeble minded lackey like Corrupt Joe Biden who will usher in the days when Obama, Clinton and the gang thatThe violently contested election is reported to be the latest reason for the Perma-Grin afflicting the Russian Strongman.
:quality(70)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/A6TUBRIL4BEGTHEUZ4P4T5HQ5I.jpg)
www.chicagotribune.com
Jesus! Get a new routine. I think you are a pathetic clown but even I feel embarrassed byAt least that what people over there have been talking about. They talk a lot about Trump over there and how much he's done for Mother Russia and Papa Putin.
Yes. I can easily believe Putin is quite happy to be rid of Trump in exchange for a feeble minded lackey like Corrupt Joe Biden who will usher in the days when Obama, Clinton and the gang thatThe violently contested election is reported to be the latest reason for the Perma-Grin afflicting the Russian Strongman.
thought the "reset" button would be a fun way to illustrate how they (democrats) were quite happy
to challenge Putin with lines drawn in the sand (which were easy to erase and ignore by Putin)
and strongly objected to the invasion of Crimea but otherwise didn't do "jack shit", unlike Trump.
Trump defies Putin with arms to Ukraine
President Donald Trump is thumping Vladimir Putin on the nose in eastern Ukraine by supplying weapons to Ukraine's military. Trump has a strange relationship with Putin, but in this case the president's got his head on straight.
Jesus! Get a new routine. I think you are a pathetic clown but even I feel embarrassed byAt least that what people over there have been talking about. They talk a lot about Trump over there and how much he's done for Mother Russia and Papa Putin.
your sad lies and transparently feeble rhetoric.
Trump won, no doubt. Problem is that Pravda makes it necessary to do your own research.Was your comparison literally one other election?Well, I’ll concede this one. But when compared to Obama’s record setter in 2008 it’s still quite a stretch.
Mail in and corruption threw this election toward Biden. Any American would demand an audit for fear of losing the country. But it appears it’s too late. Demmunists have overthrown the US.
Give me a break.
What you’re doing here, this is what happens when you make up your mind and then try to find things to support it. You decided that Trump won and now are trying to figure out how to make that reality and that includes making shit up.
Thing is, when you actually examine those “anomalies” they have rational explanations or are fabricated entirely.Trump won, no doubt. Problem is that Pravda makes it necessary to do your own research.
This incident doesn’t change any of the conspicuous anomalies already pointed out.
An honest American would admit that
Any thug dictator can use footage of the 1/6 provocation at the Capitol. Just like they can useThe propaganda value Putin received when the images were broadcast to the world of that mob of thugs storming and forcing the shut down of seat of Western Democracy is incalculable.
Let's find out what really happened before idiots like your start assigning forever points to people.Republican's are about to own it forever.
Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.Thing is, when you actually examine those “anomalies” they have rational explanations or are fabricated entirely.Trump won, no doubt. Problem is that Pravda makes it necessary to do your own research.
This incident doesn’t change any of the conspicuous anomalies already pointed out.
An honest American would admit that
But you have to be willing to be wrong and given your first statement that you have no doubt that Trump won, you aren’t willing to do so.
Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Any thug dictator can use footage of the 1/6 provocation at the Capitol. Just like they can useThe propaganda value Putin received when the images were broadcast to the world of that mob of thugs storming and forcing the shut down of seat of Western Democracy is incalculable.
footage of Minneapolis being burned down. So what?
Putin currently has his own public image problems with Alexei Navalny.
No boogie man points for you and your tired talking points.
Let's find out what really happened before idiots like your start assigning forever points to people.Republican's are about to own it forever.
Shit! You are so dumb!
Mail in votes without excuse are welfare votes. Alleviating sloth of the responsibility of voting. That’s why inexperienced young democrat voters were represented in greater numbers. And using the Blue Plague as an incentive.Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Incumbents don’t lose often. If you’re using elections from over 100 years ago, the relevance to comparison is lost. Things change. Campaigns change. Elections are different. Expecting them to be just like previous elections is not rational.
You have lots of complaints, but little evidence.Mail in votes without excuse are welfare votes. Alleviating sloth of the responsibility of voting. That’s why inexperienced young democrat voters were represented in greater numbers. And using the Blue Plague as an incentive.Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Incumbents don’t lose often. If you’re using elections from over 100 years ago, the relevance to comparison is lost. Things change. Campaigns change. Elections are different. Expecting them to be just like previous elections is not rational.
No signature matches necessary added to the theft.
This losing-incumbant vote increase dynamic having not occurred in so many years is a totally legit factor. It accentuates the likelihood of obvious theft.
It’s all perfectly mathematically relative. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and lose. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and not win in a landslide. Unless the rules were changed on the fly, unconstitutionally and allowed for cheating.You have lots of complaints, but little evidence.Mail in votes without excuse are welfare votes. Alleviating sloth of the responsibility of voting. That’s why inexperienced young democrat voters were represented in greater numbers. And using the Blue Plague as an incentive.Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Incumbents don’t lose often. If you’re using elections from over 100 years ago, the relevance to comparison is lost. Things change. Campaigns change. Elections are different. Expecting them to be just like previous elections is not rational.
No signature matches necessary added to the theft.
This losing-incumbant vote increase dynamic having not occurred in so many years is a totally legit factor. It accentuates the likelihood of obvious theft.
It's stolen because people voted by mail without an excuse. No. You may not like how people voted but that's how they voted. That's not farud.
There were signature matches. That's a false talking point.
Incumbents usually don't lose. It's only happened a handful of times. You can't draw conclusions based on past events when the sample size is so low. Especially when a lot of your sample size is so long ago that any relevance to modern politics is miniscule.
NO THEY didn't and even worse----dictator bribe taking pedophile biden has told all of Trump judge appointment to resign--------Every case was refused. None were investigated. Fear of shakedown or dem bias.Says who? My state allows ballots postmarked on Election Day, to be counted if they arrive by the Friday after Election Day.You can’t open ballots that don’t show up until after midnight.Mail in ballots are processed at central locations in each county, which is where these vote updates were coming from. That's why we had places like the the State Farm Arena in Atlanta being host to dozens of workers. They were not processed on a precinct by precinct basis, at least not in the states that are being discussed.Large population centers are broken into several precincts. Voting shouldn’t take any longer unless you’re dealing with incompetence and/or corruption. Florida fired their incompetent workers and had all of their votes counted in short order.
Primary votes tend to consistently amount to about half of general, incumbents notwithstanding.
This democrat loser duo somehow managed to exceed that doubling by record amounts. Beyond suspect. Honest people acknowledge that.
It's not incompetence, but they're limited by the law. The law in these states prevents the workers from opening ballots and processing them before the election. Florida made some good changes to their law after 2000 which is why their vote was counted quickly. Florida was allowed to count absentee and mail in ballots before the election. These late reporting states could not by law, in many places because the Republican legislatures refused to change the law despite pleas from officials that this was going to happen.
Had Republican legislatures changed the laws as requested, the votes would have been counted in short order. So in a way you're right, it was incompetence. But it was Republican incompetence that lead to this.
Trump’s team had the opportunity to challenge all of them. They lost.Speaking of laws not being changed, that’s a big part of the problem. Rules were changed without required legislation which is how this fiasco was allowed to develop. Unconstitutionally.
None of which accounts for the conspicuous excess number of votes. And all going one way.Dozens of judges heard Trump’s challenges. He lost them all. Just stop, it’s pathetic.
I guess that's now proof that Trump cheated. Trump didn't gain any votes. He lost a lot when you take out all the cheating he did.It’s all perfectly mathematically relative. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and lose. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and not win in a landslide. Unless the rules were changed on the fly, unconstitutionally and allowed for cheating.
You are entitled to your opinion but complaining about the way people vote isn’t fraud. it’s just complaining.Mail in votes without excuse are welfare votes. Alleviating sloth of the responsibility of voting. That’s why inexperienced young democrat voters were represented in greater numbers. And using the Blue Plague as an incentive.Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Incumbents don’t lose often. If you’re using elections from over 100 years ago, the relevance to comparison is lost. Things change. Campaigns change. Elections are different. Expecting them to be just like previous elections is not rational.
No signature matches necessary added to the theft.
This losing-incumbant vote increase dynamic having not occurred in so many years is a totally legit factor. It accentuates the likelihood of obvious theft.
What’s wrong with that?NO THEY didn't and even worse----dictator bribe taking pedophile biden has told all of Trump judge appointment to resign--------
They will change things going forward. They will legalize 20 million democrat voters with Biden's Executive decrees.It's too late to do anything about the 2020 election, except we must change the system to prevent more stealing of elections in the future.
Unmasked: Have we uncovered the truth about the 2020 election? - YouTube
What cheating?I guess that's now proof that Trump cheated. Trump didn't gain any votes. He lost a lot when you take out all the cheating he did.It’s all perfectly mathematically relative. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and lose. An incumbent doesn’t gain 17% and not win in a landslide. Unless the rules were changed on the fly, unconstitutionally and allowed for cheating.
But they have to have actually voted and voted legally. Big if’s.You are entitled to your opinion but complaining about the way people vote isn’t fraud. it’s just complaining.Mail in votes without excuse are welfare votes. Alleviating sloth of the responsibility of voting. That’s why inexperienced young democrat voters were represented in greater numbers. And using the Blue Plague as an incentive.Why would the percentage of mail votes for Biden be blatant? The Democrats were pushing aggressively to get their voters to do so. Trump was telling people to vote in person. This is the direct result of campaigning and exactly what you’d expect, especially based on the party identification from the ballot requests which in some states was known before Election Day and was known to skew heavily to Dems.Based on the obvious, trump won. The most blatant are the percentage of mail in votes for Biden and the increase of popular vote for trump against losing as an incumbent. Hasn’t happened since Cleveland in 1888 and Cleveland won the popular vote.
Trump’s numbers are more comparable to FDR in 1936 when he won the EC by 523-8.
Honest people know this election was cheated.
Incumbents don’t lose often. If you’re using elections from over 100 years ago, the relevance to comparison is lost. Things change. Campaigns change. Elections are different. Expecting them to be just like previous elections is not rational.
No signature matches necessary added to the theft.
This losing-incumbant vote increase dynamic having not occurred in so many years is a totally legit factor. It accentuates the likelihood of obvious theft.
What’s wrong with that?NO THEY didn't and even worse----dictator bribe taking pedophile biden has told all of Trump judge appointment to resign--------
Trump. You said yourself, you don’t get 17% more votes and lose. Obviously he didn’t get 17% more legal votes. All those extra votes must have been fabricated.What cheating?
His mail in total jibes with demographics. Biden’s didn’t.Trump. You said yourself, you don’t get 17% more votes and lose. Obviously he didn’t get 17% more legal votes. All those extra votes must have been fabricated.What cheating?
