bendog
Diamond Member
I'm not gonna waste my daily video allocation on that, but I wouldn't put Tom Coburn in with the tea party. I don't always agree with him, but he's logical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who's the bullshi**er here?Not to mention, they are brainwashed into thinking the Tea Party equals the kkk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd71TEn5E6o
Your bullshit doesn't fool anyone. The Klan is the base of the GOP, and even you know it.
When and who will the first lefty come in and say "Faux News" and not address the factual findings?
Don't get me started on Arab owned Fox News and their many lies.
No one doubts there are intelligence TPM members, they are for the most part ignorant, however.
How desperate to the leftists have to be, to commission a Federal study on how intelligent smaller-govt people are?
Every time I start thinking the liberals can't possibly get any loonier, they turn around and prove me wrong.
Best part is where their attempt to dig up things to bash conservatives for, backfires in their faces, and shows that the leftists themselves are the dumber ones.
-----------------------------------------
Wastebook: Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study ? Allen West On The Record | Nice Deb
Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study – Allen West On The Record
December, 18, 2013 — nicedeb
Senator Tom Coburn released the 2013 edition of the annual Wastebook on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, and it is filled with enraging examples of federal spending.
Greta Van Susteren wants to know why the federal government thought it was necessary to fork over almost $400,000 to do a study the cognitive abilities of tea party members. The “surprising” conclusion of the study showed that tea party members have a better scientific comprehension than non tea party members.
Wow. Who could have guessed that people who tend to be pro-life, pro-family, pro-oil, hunting, fishing, meat eating, manmade-global-warming skeptics would have better scientific comprehension than liberals? But- to be fair – I’m sure libs leave us in the dust in the self-esteem department.
people who can think for themselves, as ALL TP members do - that's why they started the movement - always have higher cognitive abilities than the sheeple which has to be led, as our leftard friends
duh
people who can think for themselves, as ALL TP members do - that's why they started the movement - always have higher cognitive abilities than the sheeple which has to be led, as our leftard friends
duh
I don't know about the "intelligence" measures per se, since the OP did not specify any actual source documents or studies--however, I have always felt that Tea Party types exhibit certain sociopathies and antisocial behavior patterns. Not ALL of them, but a very good portion of them.
Wastebook: Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study ? Allen West On The Record | Nice Deb
Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study – Allen West On The Record
How desperate to the leftists have to be, to commission a Federal study on how intelligent smaller-govt people are?
Every time I start thinking the liberals can't possibly get any loonier, they turn around and prove me wrong.
Best part is where their attempt to dig up things to bash conservatives for, backfires in their faces, and shows that the leftists themselves are the dumber ones.
-----------------------------------------
Wastebook: Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study ? Allen West On The Record | Nice Deb
Government Spent $400K On Tea Party Intelligence Study – Allen West On The Record
December, 18, 2013 — nicedeb
Senator Tom Coburn released the 2013 edition of the annual Wastebook on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, and it is filled with enraging examples of federal spending.
Greta Van Susteren wants to know why the federal government thought it was necessary to fork over almost $400,000 to do a study the cognitive abilities of tea party members. The “surprising” conclusion of the study showed that tea party members have a better scientific comprehension than non tea party members.
Wow. Who could have guessed that people who tend to be pro-life, pro-family, pro-oil, hunting, fishing, meat eating, manmade-global-warming skeptics would have better scientific comprehension than liberals? But- to be fair – I’m sure libs leave us in the dust in the self-esteem department.
people who can think for themselves, as ALL TP members do - that's why they started the movement - always have higher cognitive abilities than the sheeple which has to be led, as our leftard friends
duh
I don't know about the "intelligence" measures per se, since the OP did not specify any actual source documents or studies--however, I have always felt that Tea Party types exhibit certain sociopathies and antisocial behavior patterns. Not ALL of them, but a very good portion of them.
No one doubts there are intelligence TPM members, they are for the most part ignorant, however.
Both science literacy and CRT have been shown to correlate negatively with religiosity. And there is, in turns out, a modest negative correlation (r = -0.26, p < 0.01) between the composite science comprehension measure and a religiosity scale formed by aggregating church attendance, frequency of prayer, and self-reported "importance of God" in the respondents' lives.
In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending.
The dataset happened to have an item in it that asked respondents if they considered themselves "part of the Tea Party movement." Nineteen percent said yes.
It turns out that there is about as strong a correlation between scores on the science comprehension scale and identifying with the Tea Party as there is between scores on the science comprehension scale and Conservrepub.
Except that it has the opposite sign: that is, identifying with the Tea Party correlates positively (r = 0.05, p = 0.05) with scores on the science comprehension measure:
Best part is where their attempt to dig up things to bash conservatives for, backfires in their faces, and shows that the leftists themselves are the dumber ones.
Here is a write-up about the study since I know Little Acorn probably won't be able to find it: Some data on education, religiosity, ideology, and science comprehension
Do you guys know what a lie of omission is?
Here is what West didn't mention:
Both science literacy and CRT have been shown to correlate negatively with religiosity. And there is, in turns out, a modest negative correlation (r = -0.26, p < 0.01) between the composite science comprehension measure and a religiosity scale formed by aggregating church attendance, frequency of prayer, and self-reported "importance of God" in the respondents' lives.
In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending.
The dataset happened to have an item in it that asked respondents if they considered themselves "part of the Tea Party movement." Nineteen percent said yes.
It turns out that there is about as strong a correlation between scores on the science comprehension scale and identifying with the Tea Party as there is between scores on the science comprehension scale and Conservrepub.
Except that it has the opposite sign: that is, identifying with the Tea Party correlates positively (r = 0.05, p = 0.05) with scores on the science comprehension measure:
A graph is depicted.
What West is too retarded to grasp is that the tests still show that the more leftward a person is, the better they are at science. But it also shows a Tea Party person has a better grasp of science than someone who identifies as a Conservative Republican.
Best part is where their attempt to dig up things to bash conservatives for, backfires in their faces, and shows that the leftists themselves are the dumber ones.
Nope. It just shows Conservative Republicans are dumber than Tea Partiers.
Here is a write-up about the study since I know Little Acorn probably won't be able to find it: Some data on education, religiosity, ideology, and science comprehension
Do you guys know what a lie of omission is?
Here is what West didn't mention:
Both science literacy and CRT have been shown to correlate negatively with religiosity. And there is, in turns out, a modest negative correlation (r = -0.26, p < 0.01) between the composite science comprehension measure and a religiosity scale formed by aggregating church attendance, frequency of prayer, and self-reported "importance of God" in the respondents' lives.
A graph is depicted.
What West is too retarded to grasp is that the tests still show that the more leftward a person is, the better they are at science. But it also shows a Tea Party person has a better grasp of science than someone who identifies as a Conservative Republican.
Best part is where their attempt to dig up things to bash conservatives for, backfires in their faces, and shows that the leftists themselves are the dumber ones.
Nope. It just shows Conservative Republicans are dumber than Tea Partiers.
you are an ass.
people who can think for themselves, as ALL TP members do - that's why they started the movement - always have higher cognitive abilities than the sheeple which has to be led, as our leftard friends
duh
I don't know about the "intelligence" measures per se, since the OP did not specify any actual source documents or studies--however, I have always felt that Tea Party types exhibit certain sociopathies and antisocial behavior patterns. Not ALL of them, but a very good portion of them.
Please cite and actual source document or study for your assertions here. Or else your feelings are null and void, and people here will call you a liar.