Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 15,114
- 6,457
- 208
Sure.Not when the liable line is crossed as was clearly the case here.
Looks like CO will be paying Trump's legal fees for his other trials.![]()
The same way Trump pays them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure.Not when the liable line is crossed as was clearly the case here.
Looks like CO will be paying Trump's legal fees for his other trials.![]()
The Democrat Panic Continues...
A Colorado judge just made an arbitrary statement without the force of law to uphold it. The Judge called Trump an 'insurrectionist' without a conviction for this charge. This is liable. The judge and the state of Colorado are now on the hook for what could be millions in damages.
No court or judge has the power to arbitrarily make this distinction. It must come from a jury after charges and trial.
This is left wing tripe being spouted hoping the general public will take the deception hook, line, and sinker.
![]()
A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist
Friday’s Colorado court decision refusing to apply the 14th Amendment to disqualify former President Donald Trump from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot is a crucial victory f…thehill.com
Just another inept liberal judge.The Democrat Panic Continues...
A Colorado judge just made an arbitrary statement without the force of law to uphold it. The Judge called Trump an 'insurrectionist' without a conviction for this charge. This is liable. The judge and the state of Colorado are now on the hook for what could be millions in damages.
No court or judge has the power to arbitrarily make this distinction. It must come from a jury after charges and trial.
This is left wing tripe being spouted hoping the general public will take the deception hook, line, and sinker.
![]()
A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist
Friday’s Colorado court decision refusing to apply the 14th Amendment to disqualify former President Donald Trump from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot is a crucial victory f…thehill.com
Good luck with thatImmunity does not protect slanderous and libel acts which violate the law. Especially when they are done under color of law (official acts).
in court, statements are privileged.Immunity does not protect slanderous and libel acts which violate the law. Especially when they are done under color of law (official acts).
Stretching it are you not... The wording of the 14th amendment requires a conviction not a presumption, which you do not have. Secondly, a Judge is not protected when he/she commits a criminal act outside of the law, which this was.in court, statements are privileged.
besides that, the wording of 14th amendment section 3 uses the word engaged . "engaged in insurrection".
Since Trump gave a speech prior to it, and sat around for hours during it... well there you go.
This document from congressional research service says that it doesnt required a conviction.Stretching it are you not... The wording of the 14th amendment requires a conviction not a presumption, which you do not have. Secondly, a Judge is not protected when he/she commits a criminal act outside of the law, which this was.
Mind numbing is a preexisting condition with Democrats. MAGAYou apparently have no idea what libel is.
What a stupid thread. Just, mind numbing.