Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,969
- 58,907
- 3,565
Thats still no excuse to shoot themThey aren't delivering packages to your house at midnight and banging on the door.
And he would not have if he’d bothered to find out they were cops
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats still no excuse to shoot themThey aren't delivering packages to your house at midnight and banging on the door.
This is how police officers are trained and as the expansion of people with guns expands it's going to have to change. They are trained to shoot as soon as you see a gun. The problem is over and over the courts are ruling that people have a right to be armed.
The cops can't just start firing because they see someone exercising their 2nd Amendment rights.
What were they defending themselves from? The man never fired his weapon at them, hell he didn't even point it at them.
So he doesn't know who is banging on his door at midnight, but he is supposed to go and see if is a burglar or the police. Think about that for a minute.Thats still no excuse to shoot them
And he would not have if he’d bothered to find out they were cops
Your dumbass is always talking about what someone did with nothing to back it up with.That's what you want. You cheered when the cops killed an unarmed woman who didn't even HAVE a weapon to point at them.
Idiot.Just like you cheered when the cops killed George Floyd, who was also unarmed. It's what you like.
Your dumbass is always talking about what someone did with nothing to back it up with.
Idiot.
How is it that in this thread, I am finding myself in full agreement with mostlyleftwrong-wing trash, who usually stand solidly on the side of criminals and against the side of human beings; while my fellow conservatives are openly siding with violent subhuman criminal shit who murdered an innocent homeowner in his own home?
There is something very, very, very wrong with this picture.
You have misunderstood the argument all around.
Breanna Taylor was an innocent party. The cops lied, broke into her home and killed her.
Elijah McClain was an innocent young man simply walking home from the store.
Andre Hill was a guy hanging out in his garage. The police killed him.
What made those cases different from this one?
As far as I understand, all are pretty much the same sort of case—a police officer, acting, at best, with a depraved-heart indifference, ends up killing an innocent person. At best, such cases are manslaughter, if not outright murder. With the power and authority that a police officer has to have, comes a great responsibility to exercise due care with the use of that power.
And yet you seem to think we were wrong to protest those police actions.
No, not at all.
You were wrong to protest against situations in which an actual piece of subhuman criminal shit got into a fight with police, and lost, such as George Floyd.
And you were wrong for engaging in violent acts of destruction, violence, and terrorism against innocent people who were not a party to any cause of which you were protesting.
And by those acts, you severely undermined and discredited any message that you might ever have hoped to make via legitimate protests for legitimate causes.
There is still no excuse to keep your knee on his neck while people are yelling at you that he was in a medical distress.
Arrest him? Yes. Kill him? No.
And yet it worked. The cops that killed Taylor, McClain and others are being held accountable where they wouldn't have in the past.
I heard it was 100 trillion.
Would you make this same argument to rationalize plane crashes?i apologize for asking a question I dont know the answer to
But I did try to find the answer
The question is how many police calls does the PD in new mexico receive?
One innocent man was killed by police but how many people were saved by police intervention?
I think the answer is that the net gain to public safety is enormous
I posted a story about a homeowner who shot a kid in the head thru his door and then shot him again.....all because the kid was knocking at the wrong door....The wrong door. They then blew a guy away believing he was protecting his house which is his protected 2nd amendment right.
No. He did what he is legally allowed to do.