Multiple major banks including JP Morgan and Bank of America have been subpoenaed for Biden family finance records.

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2021
41,391
58,298
3,488
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
Screen_Shot_2023-04-07_at_3_54_07_PM_png-2774033.JPG


BREAKING: Multiple major banks including JP Morgan and Bank of America have been subpoenaed for Biden family finance records.

Now we’re talking…
Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) April 7, 2023

House Oversight Committee subpoenas banks, Biden family associates in probe of finances


In before......"We can't comment on that because it's under investigation."
 
But this is the best thread since I am here


In a statement to Fox News, Rep. James Comer said “Ranking Member Raskin has again disclosed Committee's subpoenas in a cheap attempt to thwart cooperation from other witnesses. Given his antics with the first bank subpoena, the American people and media should be asking what information Ranking Member Raskin is trying to hide this time. No one should be fooled by Ranking Member Raskin's games. We have the bank records, and the facts are not good for the Biden family.”

Reads as if it is legit. There is partisan opposition to counter the search for evidence of corruption that the partisan-controlled swamp cannot do because the government is not separated correctly. Wake the fuck up!

US4CC.meme.Lord_of_the_Rings - Independent-Committee.png



US4CC.meme.Lord_of_the_Rings - independent_investigation.png



This is going to drag on into the presidential elections, and it is going to be war of accusations of corruption that we will never understand.
 
Last edited:


In before......"We can't comment on that because it's under investigation."

and multiple investigations are going nowhere.

Benghazi!
 
Why did OP put this in Law and Justice? The United States president is having financial records subpoenaed due to unusual payments from America’s enemy, and it’s not a politics topic?
 
No, I've no need to explain further.
The implication seems to be that the Dems have another goal in mind besides the obvious - to destroy Trump through bogus felony charges and fool enough gullible idiots to believe he must be a major criminal.
 
Yet you think Trump’s “felony” for a perfectly legal NDA is going somewhere?
NDA? The case is not about an NDA, legal or otherwise. Not sure why you are convincing yourself of such nonsense.

DA Trump 1 fin small.jpg


"After winning the election, TRUMP reimbursed the Special Counsel through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust – created in New York to hold the Trump Organization’s assets during TRUMP’s presidency – and later from TRUMP’s bank account. In total, 11 checks were issued for a phony purpose. Nine of those checks were signed by TRUMP. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement. In total, 34 false entries were made in New York business records to conceal the initial covert $130,000 payment. Further, participants in the scheme took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the reimbursements." -- note: not about any NDA

Defendant Information:

DONALD J. TRUMP
Palm Beach, FL

Charges:
  • Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

[1] The charges contained in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. All factual recitations are derived from documents filed in court and statements made on the record in court.

 
Why did OP put this in Law and Justice? The United States president is having financial records subpoenaed due to unusual payments from America’s enemy, and it’s not a politics topic?
Trump is NOT The "United States president" whatever that is supposed to mean. He's an ex-president thrown out of office by The People, in favor of Sleepy Joe Biden.

see the attached: Trump is "Defendant" not former/ex-President

This is a thread about defendant
being arrested, indicted, and soon to be tried in a Court of Law.
The case brings up legal issues beyond the ordinary White Collar Crimes (Defendant Trump is accused of commiting)
 
NDA? The case is not about an NDA, legal or otherwise. Not sure why you are convincing yourself of such nonsense.

View attachment 774302

"After winning the election, TRUMP reimbursed the Special Counsel through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust – created in New York to hold the Trump Organization’s assets during TRUMP’s presidency – and later from TRUMP’s bank account. In total, 11 checks were issued for a phony purpose. Nine of those checks were signed by TRUMP. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement. In total, 34 false entries were made in New York business records to conceal the initial covert $130,000 payment. Further, participants in the scheme took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the reimbursements." -- note: not about any NDA



I see no crime, other than the misdemeanor for not putting the payment for the NDA on the proper line. This “secret” more serious crime isn’t even named.
 

Forum List

Back
Top