Incident At Bamber Bridge

[Dante]

What is the point of bringing this age-old shit up?

Why bring up the American Revolution or the US Civil War?

 

[Robert W]

Does it matter who did what between the two parties? it happened under the Government.

YES, by the Government not under it. It was your story to begin with. A tale of Democrats harming blacks. FDR'S Democrats operated the Government for 3 plus terms of him in office.

 

[Dante]

This incident took place only about twenty miles from where i live, some among the US army imported their vile racism into my Country in WW2, i am proud to say the locals of Bamber Bridge sent the racists packing and supported the Negro soldiers.

Did the US Army bring it?

I doubt that.

Seriously.

Hmm... "The battle started when white American military police (MPs) attempted to arrest several African American soldiers from the racially segregated 1511th Quartermaster Truck Regiment for being out of uniform, a violation of the US Army Code of Conduct, in the Ye Olde Hob Inn public house in Bamber Bridge." - I suspected a bs misrepresentation of things here.

o'tay

 

[Dante]

YES, by the Government not under it. It was your story to begin with. A tale of Democrats harming blacks. FDR'S Democrats operated the Government for 3 plus terms of him in office.

Please. Must you always distort in support of your attempts to spread Southern, White Christian, Conservative racism all around?

 

[Deadstick]

Did the US Army bring it?

I doubt that.

Seriously.

Hmm... "The battle started when white American military police (MPs) attempted to arrest several African American soldiers from the racially segregated 1511th Quartermaster Truck Regiment for being out of uniform, a violation of the US Army Code of Conduct, in the Ye Olde Hob Inn public house in Bamber Bridge." - I suspected a bs misrepresentation of things here.

o'tay

View attachment 975895

Tht would be the racists excuse, the British were told by the American authorities we had to import your Jim Crow laws, well we told them where to shove it.

 

[Dante]

Tht would be the racists excuse, the British were told by the American authorities we had to import your Jim Crow laws, well we told them where to shove it.

Revisionism is a tried and true tired old bag

 

[Robert W]

Please. Must you always distort in support of your attempts to spread Southern, White Christian, Conservative racism all around?

Democrats really piss you off.

 

[Robert W]

Revisionism is a tried and true tired old bag

Don't tell us you did not know about racist Democrats. And you don't know they had Jim Crow laws. And that FDR was one hell of a RAcist democrat. You don't know your history?

 

[Dante]

Don't tell us you did not know about racist Democrats. And you don't know they had Jim Crow laws. And that FDR was one hell of a RAcist democrat. You don't know your history?

When Southern, White Christian, Conservatives were in positions of leadership?

Yep.

Them they left and helped the GOP with their Southern Strategy.

Yep.

 

[Robert W]

When Southern, White Christian, Conservatives were in positions of leadership?

Yep.

Them they left and helped the GOP with their Southern Strategy.

Yep.

You will never whitewash Democrats by mentioning the southern strategy. The GOP actually is why the anti discrimination laws got passed.

 

[cnm]

You will never whitewash Democrats by mentioning the southern strategy. The GOP actually is why the anti discrimination laws got passed.

No, it was Northerners of both parties who passed it. Crackers from both parties from slave states voted against it.

Geography determined the votes on Civil Rights Act | Opinion | times-news.com​

​

If you break down the votes by location vs. party affiliation, nearly 100 percent of Democrats from the northern states supported the legislation while only 85 percent of northern Republicans supported it. None of the southern Republicans (all conservatives) voted for it, while a small percentage of liberal southern Democrats did.​

 

[cnm]

Were Republicans really the party of civil rights in the 1960s? | Harry J Enten

Harry J Enten: Once you control for region, it turns out that Democrats were actually more likely to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act

www.theguardian.com

​

Once you control for region, it turns out that Democrats were actually more likely to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act​

 

[DudleySmith]

You must be mighty proud of the racist Democrats.

You must be proud of those successful lobotomies.

 

[DudleySmith]

Yes, Democrats kept blacks in supply trucks for WW2 because to them blacks were inferior. Their leader, A famous Democrat ensured racism thrived in the military.

lol and you were there, protesting and demanding rights for them, right? lol sure you were, just like you were there fighting the Confederates just to free the slaves n stuff.

 

[DudleySmith]

Were Republicans really the party of civil rights in the 1960s? | Harry J Enten

Harry J Enten: Once you control for region, it turns out that Democrats were actually more likely to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act

www.theguardian.com

​

Once you control for region, it turns out that Democrats were actually more likely to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act​

Both the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act was pushed through due almost entirely to the political acumen and skills of one man, a Texan and protege of FDR.

He also put sunset clauses in the legisation; it was Nixon who made them permanent and applicable to all states.

 

[DudleySmith]

Idiot racists ^^ still think calling everyone else races actually works.

Yes. He's as dumb as you and your peers are, and just as dishonest.

 

[Deadstick]

No, it was Northerners of both parties who passed it. Crackers from both parties from slave states voted against it.

Geography determined the votes on Civil Rights Act | Opinion | times-news.com​

​

If you break down the votes by location vs. party affiliation, nearly 100 percent of Democrats from the northern states supported the legislation while only 85 percent of northern Republicans supported it. None of the southern Republicans (all conservatives) voted for it, while a small percentage of liberal southern Democrats did.​

Interesting breakdown, shows me naked racism ran through the US politicians at the time like a disease.

 

[Robert W]

lol and you were there, protesting and demanding rights for them, right? lol sure you were, just like you were there fighting the Confederates just to free the slaves n stuff.

Surely you were there. Beating up Democrats for owning slaves, using jim crow laws and taking down FDR.

 

[Robert W]

You must be proud of those successful lobotomies.

Yes, Democrats engaged in those also. Thanks for recalling it.

 

[Robert W]

No, it was Northerners of both parties who passed it. Crackers from both parties from slave states voted against it.

Geography determined the votes on Civil Rights Act | Opinion | times-news.com​

​

If you break down the votes by location vs. party affiliation, nearly 100 percent of Democrats from the northern states supported the legislation while only 85 percent of northern Republicans supported it. None of the southern Republicans (all conservatives) voted for it, while a small percentage of liberal southern Democrats did.​

That folks is precisely why Democrats took over the schools and their unions to give out false tales of history. They cringe at using the simple political word Democrats.