In this latest age of Science Denial is there a consensus on "Consensus in science?"

[wist43]

That's how man went to the Moon and back.

"Scary scenarios", propaganda, and $trillions doesn't make it true.

CO2 is a trace gas, that has long since reached saturation.

The majority of the warming since 1880 occurred before the onset of anthropogenic CO2.

Those are facts.

The only way around those facts is for fraudster "scientists" to move the goalposts.

Manipulate the temperature record, i.e. cool the 30's, warm the 70's, and spike everything thereafter.

North Dakota became 3F warmer last year simply by changing out sensors at the Fargo Airport.

When a Meteorologist pointed this out, he was dismissed and told that a rise of 3F from instrumentation was within acceptable tolerances.

I can assure you that had the sensors been -3F from the previous instruments, they would have been out there in an instant changing it out... but that isn't the game is it??

The game is to rig everything upward, scare the regular folk with propaganda, and steal $Trillions out of the taxpayer vault.

 

[Dante]

"Scary scenarios", propaganda, and $trillions doesn't make it true.

CO2 is a trace gas, that has long since reached saturation.

The majority of the warming since 1880 occurred before the onset of anthropogenic CO2.

Those are facts.

The only way around those facts is for fraudster "scientists" to move the goalposts.

Manipulate the temperature record, i.e. cool the 30's, warm the 70's, and spike everything thereafter.

North Dakota became 3F warmer last year simply by changing out sensors at the Fargo Airport.

When a Meteorologist pointed this out, he was dismissed and told that a rise of 3F from instrumentation was within acceptable tolerances.

I can assure you that had the sensors been -3F from the previous instruments, they would have been out there in an instant changing it out... but that isn't the game is it??

The game is to rig everything upward, scare the regular folk with propaganda, and steal $Trillions out of the taxpayer vault.

Go away with your nonsense. Your paranoid conspiracy stuff is boring. Science is always unfolding and changing as new observations and data comes in.

Take your ideologically driven politcal arguments about science and show them.

 

[Dante]

Meteorologists are primarily experts in weather. They study short-term atmospheric conditions and focus on forecasting events like rain, storms, and temperature changes up to a few days or weeks out. [1, 2]
The differences in their focus areas highlight their respective specialties:

• Meteorologists: Specialize in weather. They monitor the atmosphere to provide daily forecasts and warnings for severe, immediate events like hurricanes and tornadoes. [1, 2]
• Climatologists: Specialize in climate. They study long-term atmospheric patterns, analyzing trends and averages spanning decades (typically 30 years or more) to understand climate change and long-term environmental shifts.

Spanking: 101

 

[marvin martian]

consensus in science

Ah yes, we know how you people do "consensus" in science:

 

[Dante]

Ah yes, we know how you people do "consensus" in science:

View attachment 1262718

We know how you people make stuff up.

 

[marvin martian]

View attachment 1262721

We know how you people make stuff up.

Are you claiming the quotes I posted are made up?

 

[Dante]

Are you claiming the quotes I posted are made up?

Nope. Now go away.

any quote out of context can be made to look like the opposite or worse. Now stfu