Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Israeli Agents and Activity Prior to 9/11
Well-known in 9/11 skeptic circles but covered up with remarkable efficiency in the mainstream press, is the presence and odd behavior of five Israeli men, at least two of whom it was later determined were Israeli Mossad agents, and all of whom had previously served in the Israeli military. Police reports show that a van driven by the men tested positive for the presence of explosives onboard at some point. The men, Sivan Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Omer Gavriel Marmari, Oded Ellner, Paul Kurzberg, were first reported by a woman who saw three of them outside her apartment window cheering, high-fiving, and photographing each other flicking cigarette lighters in front of the burning towers.
In a rare mainstream media report on the five, the New York Times reported on November 21, 2001:
The five aroused attention in New Jersey after people noticed them going to unusual lengths to photograph the World Trade Center ruins and making light of the situation. One photograph developed by the F.B.I. showed Sivan Kurzberg holding a lighted lighter in the foreground, with the smoldering wreckage in the background,"
The men had set up cameras, trained on the towers, before the first tower was hit, atop their van in Liberty State Park, New Jersey. They later lied repeatedly to the police about their whereabouts and movements, as documented in FBI reports.
ABC News said:
"ABC News has learned that after the five men were taken to jail, the entire case was transferred out of FBI's criminal division and into its foreign counterintelligence section, which is responsible for espionage cases. One reason for the shift, according to our sources, is that the FBI believed Urban Moving may have provided a cover for agents of Israeli intelligence."
FBI reports reveal that the group had scouted out the building on the day before, lying to residents that they were construction workers.
Fox News reported:
"The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards..."
After being held for two months the men were quietly released on orders from the Bush White House.
The events she was focused on, and what her audience was expecting, was the discussion about the treatment of Muslims after that tragic day. Focusing on four words only, and to denigrate her as being condescending, or saying fuck you to America, is just another demand for political correctness (PC bashing). It's not like she's claiming the CIA or the Mossad did it, or that there was any justification for it at all.
I am fully aware of her audience. It does not let her off the hook for downplaying the 9/11 event. The perpetrators were animals and terrorist. If you are downplaying or “correcting” it to appease your audience then that is an even bigger problem.
She downplayed nothing. She argued you do not condemn and entire group of people for what a few did. Do we condemn all pro-lifers for the actions of the few that took the lives of others?
Again, she could have accomplished her point without the smugness and trivializing statement of “some people” and “some thing”.
She could have simply said "after 911" too. But she is just not as proficient in English as you or I.
Bullshit. Proficiency in English or lack thereof had nothing to do with it. She was very proficient and cognizant when she chose to question American Jews’ loyalty.
I am fully aware of her audience. It does not let her off the hook for downplaying the 9/11 event. The perpetrators were animals and terrorist. If you are downplaying or “correcting” it to appease your audience then that is an even bigger problem.
She downplayed nothing. She argued you do not condemn and entire group of people for what a few did. Do we condemn all pro-lifers for the actions of the few that took the lives of others?
Again, she could have accomplished her point without the smugness and trivializing statement of “some people” and “some thing”.
She could have simply said "after 911" too. But she is just not as proficient in English as you or I.
Bullshit. Proficiency in English or lack thereof had nothing to do with it. She was very proficient and cognizant when she chose to question American Jews’ loyalty.
Oh is that where somebody threw some money at somebody else?
She learned English from TV. It shows.
