In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[deanrd]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

Trump wouldn't have sex with a normal woman.

But he would have unprotected sex with a porn star.

And, it's rumored, he begs prostitutes to pee on him.

 

[WinterBorn]

The idea that men have it so bad while women have it so good is laughable. Yes, they control when men get access to their bodies. Otherwise it is called rape.

But the #1 cause of hospitalization for women is being beaten by their boyfriend or husband.
Women are required to be beautiful, whether they are talented, skilled or whatever. Men can be ugly and successful.
Women are not allowed to age and be popular. Men can have grey hair, pot-bellies, and bald spots and still consider themselves "studs".
The talk about women having lots of partners and taking pictures or videos of them with their lovers is accurate of a small percentage of women. Far more sit home lonely because they cannot go out seeking companionship without being called sluts. For men that is not the case.

The OP is just another incel who expects to be serviced by women, preferably ones who saved themselves just for him, whenever he wants. They are to put out when men want, otherwise they are frigid or a tease. But what they want is irrelevant.

You should talk to DanielP. You two think of women the same way.

 

[Crepitus]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

You're one a them "incel" people ain't you.

 

[deanrd]

The idea that men have it so bad while women have it so good is laughable. Yes, they control when men get access to their bodies. Otherwise it is called rape.

But the #1 cause of hospitalization for women is being beaten by their boyfriend or husband.
Women are required to be beautiful, whether they are talented, skilled or whatever. Men can be ugly and successful.
Women are not allowed to age and be popular. Men can have grey hair, pot-bellies, and bald spots and still consider themselves "studs".
The talk about women having lots of partners and taking pictures or videos of them with their lovers is accurate of a small percentage of women. Far more sit home lonely because they cannot go out seeking companionship without being called sluts. For men that is not the case.

The OP is just another incel who expects to be serviced by women, preferably ones who saved themselves just for him, whenever he wants. They are to put out when men want, otherwise they are frigid or a tease. But what they want is irrelevant.

You should talk to DanielP. You two think of women the same way.

Wow, you cover the 1950's really well.

Today however, is not in the 1950's.

 

[Picaro]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

Having sex as a job is prostitution, doing porn is having sex for money, so yes those are the same.

Women having to are wanting to marry for money is largely a grey area now; in the past it was social taboos against having careers and/or getting paid much for any job they did that made financial considerations part of the marriage game so no, that isn't the same, that's what men expected and legislation backed it up. In that case, it's men who became pimps and sex slave purchasers.

Women who only seek out men with money are of course prostitutes seeking money in exchange for sex.

I don't see any confusion or much grey area involved.

As for prostitution, it is not men paying for sex, it's men paying them to go away afterwards.

 

[there4eyeM]

What is obvious from most of these posts is that only Winterborn comes close to understanding women.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

Surely you jest

 

[Picaro]

don't know what country any of you live in but from Jr. High on there have always been a lot of girls and women around who have no problems enjoying dating and sex and don't expect to get paid for it nor cared whether or not stranger thought they were 'sluts n stuff'. Some had ideals that differentiated between 'guys you married' and 'guys you didn't', of course, and that is only normal, too; not everybody you like screwing is going to be a good marriage partner. Some cultures, like the French, allow a little lee way for that fact of life, for both sexes.

Marriages are mostly about politics and family security, including finances especially re children, a major concern for women more so than men; making them about love is a recent historical development.

I suspect a lot of you were nerds or uncomfortable around women and got your education about them from crap like Playboy or Hollywood movies, i.e. from silly dysfunctional faggots.

 

[there4eyeM]

Prostitution is a memorial to the fragility and vulnerability of the men. Most "porn" (whatever that may be) is as well. Because hormones and other bits of nature push males to have sex quickly and often, their 'needs' exceed those of the female of the human species. Women exploiting that merely use what is offered to them by their surroundings.
Men still have so much to learn!

 

[gtopa1]

To lefty feminists yes; all the same.

Greg

 

[Picaro]

Prostitution is a memorial to the fragility and vulnerability of the men. Most "porn" (whatever that may be) is as well. Because hormones and other bits of nature push males to have sex quickly and often, their 'needs' exceed those of the female of the human species. Women exploiting that merely use what is offered to them by their surroundings.
Men still have so much to learn!

Women are just better at self-control, is all; the consequences of sex are much greater for them than it is for horny boys and men. They are just as 'horny', if not more so, and even more avid for human contact than males, who would be just as satisfied with 'hit and run' than hanging around afterwards. Most men are stupid and untrustworthy re relationships, and women learn that early, at least most do.

FYI, Amazon's biggest online sale category is sex toys, as in dildos and other fun things for women; apparently those are over half its revenues.

 

[SweetSue92]

Both genders make sacrifices and deal with things that aren't fair.

What sacrifices is the female gender making and what unfair things are they dealing with?

How about this. Living with a society full of men who still want to be men, but an America full of men who can't act like men because their generation has told them this is "toxic". Being a man. "Toxic"

Living with a society full of men who are hobbled by addictions to porn. So they are unable to perform otherwise.

And a bunch of other stuff. We're in late-stage Rome territory now, no doubt about that.

 

[Two Thumbs]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

well according to my Dad; "All women are whores. You buy diner, you buy the rings."

I did tell him that he was calling my Mom and his Mom, whores.

but, of course, it's all true.

 

[Meriweather]

well according to my Dad; "All women are whores. You buy diner, you buy the rings."

I did tell him that he was calling my Mom and his Mom, whores.

but, of course, it's all true.

What came first: Whoring (by men) which of course then made women the whores. Or, are all women whores so all men go whoring?

 

[there4eyeM]

The only single thing that all women are is women.

 

[WinterBorn]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

well according to my Dad; "All women are whores. You buy diner, you buy the rings."

I did tell him that he was calling my Mom and his Mom, whores.

but, of course, it's all true.

“All women are whores” is only true if all you want from women is sex. Then you get what you deserve.

 

[there4eyeM]

All women are whores only to the thoroughly worthless males who have nothing but contempt for their sisters. For such men, the rest of us have only contempt.

 

[Meriweather]

All women are whores only to the thoroughly worthless males who have nothing but contempt for their sisters. For such men, the rest of us have only contempt.

Thank you.

 

[danielpalos]

The idea that men have it so bad while women have it so good is laughable. Yes, they control when men get access to their bodies. Otherwise it is called rape.

But the #1 cause of hospitalization for women is being beaten by their boyfriend or husband.
Women are required to be beautiful, whether they are talented, skilled or whatever. Men can be ugly and successful.
Women are not allowed to age and be popular. Men can have grey hair, pot-bellies, and bald spots and still consider themselves "studs".
The talk about women having lots of partners and taking pictures or videos of them with their lovers is accurate of a small percentage of women. Far more sit home lonely because they cannot go out seeking companionship without being called sluts. For men that is not the case.

The OP is just another incel who expects to be serviced by women, preferably ones who saved themselves just for him, whenever he wants. They are to put out when men want, otherwise they are frigid or a tease. But what they want is irrelevant.

You should talk to DanielP. You two think of women the same way.

i actually have more than just stories to tell, story teller.

it is about equality and equal rights regardless of porn or non-porn sector.

 

[WinterBorn]

The idea that men have it so bad while women have it so good is laughable. Yes, they control when men get access to their bodies. Otherwise it is called rape.

But the #1 cause of hospitalization for women is being beaten by their boyfriend or husband.
Women are required to be beautiful, whether they are talented, skilled or whatever. Men can be ugly and successful.
Women are not allowed to age and be popular. Men can have grey hair, pot-bellies, and bald spots and still consider themselves "studs".
The talk about women having lots of partners and taking pictures or videos of them with their lovers is accurate of a small percentage of women. Far more sit home lonely because they cannot go out seeking companionship without being called sluts. For men that is not the case.

The OP is just another incel who expects to be serviced by women, preferably ones who saved themselves just for him, whenever he wants. They are to put out when men want, otherwise they are frigid or a tease. But what they want is irrelevant.

You should talk to DanielP. You two think of women the same way.

i actually have more than just stories to tell, story teller.

it is about equality and equal rights regardless of porn or non-porn sector.

You are not interested in equality. If you were you would consider what the woman wants. You have shown you do not.

And the “storyteller” nonsense is laughable.