In Pennsylvania, a batch of 600,000 votes went 99.5% for Biden

[bripat9643]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They haven't gone to court yet, you fucking moron. Why you haven't had a brain transplant yet, can't find a donor?

They haven't gone to court yet? They've filed numerous lawsuits and have lost all but one and I think that was even eventually over turned. OMG, this has bene going on for weeks.

No they haven't, moron. Other Republicans have filed lawsuits, not Giulani or any of Trump's lawyers. You've been conned.

 

[HappyJoy]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They're too busy cleaning up Rudy Giuliani's hair dye.

And I was told there are some jobs Americans would not do.

 

[Erinwltr]

If they are handling mail-in ballots, the envolopes they come in have names and addresses. That's why you are supposed to have observers.

Yeah, but after you remove it have a camara there. Why not? Or better yet... Fuck it... Lets just go to a better system

In person voting is the better system. They check you ID an then note your attendance in their log. All the changes Dims have made are intended to facilitate voter fraud.

LOL! Nope. Yer still posting smack, dipshit.

 

[meaner gene]

Actually it should be pretty easy to prove they were telling the truth, such as by what federal judges looking at their evidence concluded.

And almost universally federal judges looking at their evidence, threw it out.

Which is why it's going to the highest court now... If they throw it out... Then no proof, nothing to be done. You don't spend that kind of money thinking you are going to lose. Doesn't mean they won't... But they believe they are right.

The only thing the Supreme Court can do, is to reinstate the dismissed case, and remand it back to the original court. They can't make any injunctive relief, because there is not enough evidence on the record for them to make that judgement.

 

[bripat9643]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They're too busy cleaning up Rudy Giuliani's hair dye.

And I was told there are some jobs Americans would not do.

You were told that by the same douchebags you voted for.

 

[bripat9643]

If they are handling mail-in ballots, the envolopes they come in have names and addresses. That's why you are supposed to have observers.

Yeah, but after you remove it have a camara there. Why not? Or better yet... Fuck it... Lets just go to a better system

In person voting is the better system. They check you ID an then note your attendance in their log. All the changes Dims have made are intended to facilitate voter fraud.

LOL! Nope. Yer still posting smack, dipshit.

Demorats would support it if it was less secure, douchebag.

 

[Erinwltr]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They're too busy cleaning up Rudy Giuliani's hair dye.

And I was told there are some jobs Americans would not do.

Trump Team are not Americans.

 

[bripat9643]

Actually it should be pretty easy to prove they were telling the truth, such as by what federal judges looking at their evidence concluded.

And almost universally federal judges looking at their evidence, threw it out.

Which is why it's going to the highest court now... If they throw it out... Then no proof, nothing to be done. You don't spend that kind of money thinking you are going to lose. Doesn't mean they won't... But they believe they are right.

The only thing the Supreme Court can do, is to reinstate the dismissed case, and remand it back to the original court. They can't make any injunctive relief, because there is not enough evidence on the record for them to make that judgement.

Wrong.

 

[HappyJoy]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They haven't gone to court yet, you fucking moron. Why you haven't had a brain transplant yet, can't find a donor?

They haven't gone to court yet? They've filed numerous lawsuits and have lost all but one and I think that was even eventually over turned. OMG, this has bene going on for weeks.

No they haven't, moron. Other Republicans have filed lawsuits, not Giulani or any of Trump's lawyers. You've been conned.

Oh?

Trump and his allies filed more than 40 lawsuits challenging the 2020 election results. All of them failed.

Since Donald Trump lost in November 2020, Republicans have filed dozens of lawsuits challenging the presidential election results. They've won zero.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[meaner gene]

If they are handling mail-in ballots, the envolopes they come in have names and addresses. That's why you are supposed to have observers.

Trump said that absentee ballots are 100% legitimate, but that other mail-in ballots are not.

The ballot envelopes coming in, do not distinguish one from the other.

 

[HappyJoy]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They're too busy cleaning up Rudy Giuliani's hair dye.

And I was told there are some jobs Americans would not do.

You were told that by the same douchebags you voted for.

Yeah, little did they know how low you guys grovel.

Maybe take a different path, you keep walking into it.

 

[meaner gene]

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any real election fraud in any of their court cases? There is a bit of a time crunch, whether you guys realize that or not. It's going to be next to impossible to reverse the certification of any states and it'll never happen without a crack team of lawyers which is safe to say Trump does not have.

Trumps crack team of lawyers withdrew from the case. Now he has Rudy Giuliani.

 

[bripat9643]

If they are handling mail-in ballots, the envolopes they come in have names and addresses. That's why you are supposed to have observers.

Trump said that absentee ballots are 100% legitimate, but that other mail-in ballots are not.

The ballot envelopes coming in, do not distinguish one from the other.

Absentee ballots have to be requested. They aren't sent out willy-nilly to anyone on the voter roles, which are stuffed with bogus voters. Dims know this. They are stupid, but not as stupid as they pretend to be.

 

[meaner gene]

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They haven't gone to court yet, you fucking moron. Why you haven't had a brain transplant yet, can't find a donor?

They haven't gone to court yet?

Are you sure you want to go with that answer?

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

LOLOLOLOLOL!!!

Here's the skinny, TrumpTards.

Trump is getting his fat ass kicked badly.

"""Pennsylvania
3rd U.S. Court of Appeals: In Bognet v. Boockvar, Republicans argued that the extended mail-in ballot deadline challenged the constitution.

• Status: Denied.

U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Barnette v. Lawrence, the GOP lawsuit claimed that Montgomery County wrongly allowed mail-in voters the chance to cure ballots.

• Status: Dismissed.

U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Trump v. Philadelphia County Board of Elections, the Trump campaign argued that there was insufficient access by observers. <-----(Pootney's claim)

• Status: Denied. The Trump campaign later admitted that there were a "nonzero number of people in the room" observing the vote count, including some affiliated with the campaign. Judge Paul S. Diamond shot back, "I'm sorry, then what's your problem?"

(LOLOLOLOL)


U.S. District Court, Middle District: In Pirkle v. Wolf, four voter plaintiffs generalized allegations of fraud, based on complaints issued by third parties.

• Status: Withdrawn.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court: In response to the Canvass of Absentee and Mail-in Ballots, Republicans claim that Philadelphia did not give election observers enough access.

• Status: Denied. The court reversed the petition allowing an appeal. The court rejected the Trump campaign's claim that mail-in ballots with minor flaws must be rejected.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Hamm v. Boockvar, Republicans claimed that the state wrongly allowed voters to cast provisional ballots to cure invalid mail ballots.

• Status: Denied.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: Northampton Republicans challenged notifications of votes that were canceled during prescreening.

• Status: Withdrawn.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Trump v. Boockvar, the campaign challenged the three-day deadline extension given to mail-in voters missing identification to supply proof of identification.

• Status: Relief granted. The court found that the secretary of state had no authority to provide an extension. The secretary of state's office has said the total number of votes is probably fewer than 100 statewide.

Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County: Both the Republican National Committee and the Trump campaign challenged over 2,000 mail-in ballots.

• Status: Active. The Democratic National Committee and Bucks County seek an immediate review in Pennsylvania's Supreme Court of whether minor oversights can invalidate ballots.

Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas: In Trump v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, the Trump campaign and the RNC challenged about 600 mail-in ballots that lacked voters' addresses.

• Status: Withdrawn.

U.S. Supreme Court: In Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, Republicans challenged the extended mail-in ballot deadline.

• Status: Active.

U.S. District Court, Middle District: In Trump v. Boockvar, the campaign is arguing that different provisional ballot practices violate equal protection.

• Status: Active.
• A federal judge dismissed the suit Saturday in a scathing opinion: "This claim, like Frankenstein's Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together," Judge Matthew Brann wrote.
• The Trump campaign on Monday appealed Saturday's ruling in a document riddled with perplexing logic and multiple grammatical errors.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court: The Trump campaign appealed a Philadelphia County Board of Elections decision to count five different categories of mail-in and absentee ballots.

• Status: Active. The court is reviewing whether the state election code allows curing some mail-in ballots by casting provisional ballots.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court: In Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections, Nicole Ziccarelli, a GOP legislative candidate, challenged 2,349 undated mail-in ballots.

• Status: Stayed. Ziccarelli sought an injunction Monday to stop the certification of votes in Allegheny County.

Court of Common Pleas for Westmoreland County: Ziccarelli is also challenging a small number of provisional ballots.

• Status: Pending.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Kelly v. Pennsylvania, a group of Republicans, led by Rep. Mike Kelly, claimed that the state's no-excuse mail ballot law violates the state constitution. They sought an order blocking certification of most mail-in votes or that directs the state Assembly to choose the presidential electors.

• Status: Active. The court on Wednesday issued a temporary blocking of any action to certify votes in Pennsylvania, “to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification.” A hearing is set for Friday. The state has sought a supreme court review.

Trump lawsuit fails to overturn Pennsylvania election results
Nov. 22, 202002:07

Michigan
U.S. District Court, Western District: In Johnson/Stoddard v. Benson, two Trump supporters made generalized allegations of voter fraud.

• Status: Withdrawn.

U.S. District Court, Western District: In Trump v. Benson, the campaign claimed that Wayne County denied election challengers proper access to watch election workers handle ballots.

• Status: Withdrawn.

Wayne County Circuit Court, Court of Appeals: In Constantino v. Detroit, two Republican poll challengers alleged irregularities in the vote.

• Status: Denied. The plaintiffs have appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Wayne County Circuit Court: In Stoddard v. Detroit, the plaintiffs claimed that ballots were improperly duplicated by Democratic Party inspectors.

• Status: Denied.

Michigan Court of Claims: In Trump v. Benson, the campaign sought to have more poll observers watch the vote count.

• Status: Denied. The plaintiffs appealed to the appellate court. Judge Cynthia D. Stephens said in her opinion that the case was "inadmissible hearsay within hearsay." "I heard someone else say something," Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said Thursday, summing up an affidavit submitted by the Trump campaign. "Tell me how that is not hearsay. Come on now!"

U.S. District Court, Western District: In Bally v. Whitmer, a group of voters disputed election results in three counties based on allegations of voting irregularities and fraud.

• Status: Withdrawn.

Wisconsin
U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Langenhorst v. Pecore, Republicans made generalized allegations of voter fraud that relied on third-party accounts.

• Status: Dismissed.

Wisconsin Supreme Court: In Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Wisconsin Election Commission, a conservative group claims that the five cities of Kenosha, Green Bay, Madison, Milwaukee and Racine illegally accepted grants from Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerburg to improve election systems. They also claim that officials failed to get voter identification for some mail-in ballots.

• Status: Active.

Arizona
Maricopa County Superior Court: In Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes, the Republicans sought a hand recount of the ballots cast in Maricopa County by precinct. The GOP does not allege fraud, but it claims that the audit of votes did not meet state law.

• Status: Dismissed.

Maricopa County Superior Court: In Trump v. Hobbs, the Trump campaign claimed that using Sharpies to fill in mail-in ballots caused an overvote and invalidated ballots.

• Status: Dismissed.

Nevada
Clark County District Court: In Election Integrity Project v. Nevada, the plaintiffs claimed that Nevada's vote-by-mail structure is unconstitutional. The suit was filed in September.

• Status: Active.

1st Judicial District Court, Carson City: In Law v. Whitmer, Trump's six electors claimed irregularities, including the improper use of scanning machines to verify signatures.

• Status: Active.

U.S. District Court: In Stokke v. Cegavske, the plaintiffs sought to stop the use of automated signature matching in Clark County.

• Status: Dismissed.

Nevada Supreme Court: In Kraus v. Cegavske, the Trump campaign, the Nevada GOP and a Republican voter and count-watcher named Fred Kraus sued to stop the use of automated signature matching.

• Status: Dismissed. The parties reached an agreement to allow for more observers.

Clark County District Court: In Becker v. Gloria, April Becker, a state Senate candidate, challenged the use of automated systems to match mail-in ballot signatures and the mailing of ballots to all registered voters.

• Status: Active.

Clark County District Court: In Marchant v. Gloria, Jim Marchant, a congressional candidate, challenged the use of automated systems for signature-matching and for mailing ballots to all registered voters.

• Status: Active.

Clark County District Court: In Rodimer v. Gloria, Daniel Rodimer, a state legislative candidate, challenged the use of automated systems for signature-matching and mailing ballots to all registered voters.

• Status: Active.

Georgia
U.S. District Court, Northern District: In Wood v. Raffensperger, an Atlanta lawyer and Trump supporter sought an injunction to prevent a statewide canvass, arguing that a consent decree wrongly imposes an invalid procedure to verify voter signatures.

• Status: Dismissed.

U.S. District Court, Southern District: In Brooks v. Mahoney, four Republican voters claimed that a voting machine software glitch caused a miscounting of votes.

• Status: Dismissed.

Chatham County Superior Court: The Georgia Republican Party and the Trump campaign sought a reminder that mail-in ballots arriving late would not be counted.

• Status: Dismissed.

Minnesota
Minnesota Supreme Court: In Kistner v. Simon, several Republican candidates make generalized claims of voting irregularities. The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday and sought to block the state's certification of votes until an audit of the returns could be completed.

• Status: Active.""""

Trump's election fight includes over 50 lawsuits. It's not going well.

"Calling an election unfair does not make it so," one ruling said.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[HappyJoy]

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They haven't gone to court yet, you fucking moron. Why you haven't had a brain transplant yet, can't find a donor?

They haven't gone to court yet?

Are you sure you want to go with that answer?

It wouldn't be bripat if he didn't call someone a moron while demonstrating his own incompetence.

 

[meaner gene]

In person voting is the better system. They check you ID an then note your attendance in their log.

In-person voting in the middle of a pandemic makes no sense. When more people have died from the pandemic, than the margin of victory in the swing states.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Listen up folks,: Donald Trump claimed the vote in 2016 was rigged against him, and then he won. This time he claimed the vote was rigged against him, and he has convinced those his supporters "how can this be" when he lost.

The answer to how can this be is easy, because as President he has been a total failure:

• He has divided the people into tribes
• He mislead the public with tens of thousand's of lies
• He continued to put people into harm's way, did not
  • Use the Defense Production Act, to
    • produce PPE
    • produce ventilators
• He has violated the Emoluments Clause of our Constitution
• He has used EO's to circumvent the Congress
• Here are 45 terrible things Trump has done as president

And even as a lame duck he has proved to be an enemy to our nation.

 

[HappyJoy]

Until an affidavit is submitted to a court of law, there is no penalty for lying on it.

And so far, I don't know of any affidavits being accepted by a federal court in any of the lawsuits Trump filed.

That's your argument, "they haven't been submitted yet?"

The lawyers knew a great many of the affidavits people filed contained provable lies. Those affidavits were not submitted to court.

Those affidavits containing vague accusations (not provable either way) were the one's submitted.

Horseshit.

Why hasn't the Trump team presented any decent, believable examples of voter fraud in court? No time like the present.

They're too busy cleaning up Rudy Giuliani's hair dye.

And I was told there are some jobs Americans would not do.

You were told that by the same douchebags you voted for.

Yeah, little did they know how low you guys grovel.

Maybe take a different path, you keep walking into it.

You don't know the meaning of the word "grovel," obviously. Thanks for proving that you're an idiot.

No, groveling Trump supporters sounds about right.

 

[meaner gene]

Trump said that absentee ballots are 100% legitimate, but that other mail-in ballots are not.

The ballot envelopes coming in, do not distinguish one from the other.

Absentee ballots have to be requested. They aren't sent out willy-nilly to anyone on the voter roles, which are stuffed with bogus voters.

Absentee ballot requests are serviced by the same voter rolls you call BOGUS.
One of the proven cases of voter fraud involved a man requesting an absentee ballot for his dead mother.