In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

Penelope

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2014
60,265
15,795
2,210
Five Republican-led states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee—have extended unemployment benefits to anyone who loses their job because they refused a COVID vaccine. In general, workers who quit or are fired for cause are not eligible for unemployment, but these Republican states have carved out exceptions for those who refuse the vaccine, the Washington Post reported, and more Republican states may soon follow.

In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

an opinion
and one not an opinion

Its only for those companies over 100.

For refusing the vaccine you will get unemployment, for the people that don't want to work.
 
Lack of vaccination cards are a bridge too far when it comes to government "helping" people. Good thing so many labor unions are pushing back against this nonsense :oops:
 
Its only for people who don't want to work.

Yes the labor unions are pushing back on this, because republican worker don't want to work.
They don't want to work or they won't get vaccinated? Maybe they won't get vaccinated so they don't have to work?
 
Five Republican-led states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee—have extended unemployment benefits to anyone who loses their job because they refused a COVID vaccine. In general, workers who quit or are fired for cause are not eligible for unemployment, but these Republican states have carved out exceptions for those who refuse the vaccine, the Washington Post reported, and more Republican states may soon follow.

In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

an opinion
and one not an opinion

Its only for those companies over 100.

For refusing the vaccine you will get unemployment, for the people that don't want to work.
Republicans defend your right to spread COVID
 
Its only for people who don't want to work.

Yes the labor unions are pushing back on this, because republican worker don't want to work.
Or maybe they just want to work without having to donate their bodies to some corporation for experiments.

A corporation is not in charge of people’s health. They aren’t being held responsible for effects of the vaccine or of WuFlu should their employees get either, so how can they be responsible if an employee doesn’t get a vaccine? The so-called vaccine doesn’t even stop infection or transmission anyway.
 
Five Republican-led states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee—have extended unemployment benefits to anyone who loses their job because they refused a COVID vaccine. In general, workers who quit or are fired for cause are not eligible for unemployment, but these Republican states have carved out exceptions for those who refuse the vaccine, the Washington Post reported, and more Republican states may soon follow.

In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

an opinion
and one not an opinion

Its only for those companies over 100.

For refusing the vaccine you will get unemployment, for the people that don't want to work.

Didn't you already start this nearly exact same thread just a few weeks ago?
 
Five Republican-led states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee—have extended unemployment benefits to anyone who loses their job because they refused a COVID vaccine. In general, workers who quit or are fired for cause are not eligible for unemployment, but these Republican states have carved out exceptions for those who refuse the vaccine, the Washington Post reported, and more Republican states may soon follow.

In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

an opinion
and one not an opinion

Its only for those companies over 100.

For refusing the vaccine you will get unemployment, for the people that don't want to work.

The only way that there is anything wrong with this is that nobody should be facing job loss or discrimination in the first place, for declining to be injected with dangerous experimental drugs.

Allowing those who have lost their jobs for this reason to collect unemployment is a pathetic band-aid mitigation for a problem that ought not have been allowed to exist in the first place.

The correct solution would be to allow nasty lawsuits, and even bring serious criminal charges, against anyone who has any willing part in attempting to coerce anyone into receiving these dangerous experimental drugs. Anyone who would have any willing part in this crime, belongs in prison; and should even be subject to the death penalty should anyone die as a result of having been coerced into accepting these dangerous drugs.
 
Only the red states are going this way , those who don't want to work.
The more red states giving unemployment benefits to people who refuse the fascist vaccine mandates, the faster they'll stop this gross infringement on our freedom. What little the Socialist have left us.
 
See you at the Supreme Court on Jan 7th. I think even your man Biden is feeling pretty gloomy about his prospects.

Be interesting to see if the Supreme Court is willing to end at will hiring where an employer can fire anyone for any reason.
At will employment has always been a cornerstone for Conservatives

Will they make Anti-vax a protected class?
 
Five Republican-led states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee—have extended unemployment benefits to anyone who loses their job because they refused a COVID vaccine. In general, workers who quit or are fired for cause are not eligible for unemployment, but these Republican states have carved out exceptions for those who refuse the vaccine, the Washington Post reported, and more Republican states may soon follow.

In other words, Republicans are rewarding people for refusing the vaccine.

an opinion
and one not an opinion

Its only for those companies over 100.

For refusing the vaccine you will get unemployment, for the people that don't want to work.
Yeah. They're pushing back against an egregious abuse of the regulatory state. OSHA is not a public health agency and has no legitimate authority to impose these kinds of mandates.
 

Forum List

Back
Top