In legal terms it's called the "subornation of perjury."

[EvilCat Breath]

Just as I thought, you can't prove your assertion. The committee had an open invitation to anyone with testimony that conflicted with Hutchinson's to step forward and testify. It's disgusting how you people lie.

Bullshit. The actual witnesses were not only never allowed to testify. They weren't allowed in the Chamber. Hutchinson was never a witness to anything. She wasn't there. Her testify was that she heard it from someone who heard it from the person who was there and everyone in that chain called her a liar.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Not unless it has an ongoing investigation. The DOJ can't just prosecute people whenever it likes on a whim.

Of course they can. They've been doing it for years.

 

[Chillicothe]

Her testify was that she heard it from someone who heard it from the person who was there and everyone in that chain called her a liar.

Who all was in your asserted "chain"?
And show us where they called her liar. Under oath. Or in public.

 

[kyzr]

Who all was in your asserted "chain"?
And show us where they called her liar. Under oath. Or in public.

Ornato & Engle, like I posted in post #42 already. Round and round and round and round and round...
The issue is dead. There was no issue. It always was total bullshit. The J6 Committee ignored it, duh.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/06/29/cnn_secret_service_agents_willing_to_dispute_cassidy_hutchinsons_trump_suv_allegation_under_oath.html