In California, 3,000 votes were recorded from an empty dorm building

[debbiedowner]

This settles it - Trump won California!

I heard he was going to be reinstated in August.

 

[Turtlesoup]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

 

[BluesLegend]

Not a smidgeon of Dem election cheating I tell you. Where all the votes oddly for Biden? #extremesarcasm

 

[BluesLegend]

This settles it - Trump won California!

^^^ look the left is trying to be clever

 

[DrLove]

This settles it - Trump won California!

I heard he was going to be reinstated in August.

Well actually Q said on 1-20 the military was going to arrest the bunch of ‘em on those Capitol steps and escort Dotard back into the Oval.
Boy were the Kooks ever upset about that.
They’ll be just as upset in August because, well … they never learn

 

[Care4all]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

Nope, not even close.

 

[Dragonlady]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

 

[Dragonlady]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

These full-time students were registered to vote in the precinct. If not for the pandemic they would’ve been living in the dorms. They were simply away from their residences waiting for them to reopen but having paid tuition they were still entitled to live there. Therefore they were still entitled to vote there since they haven’t moved, unless they were voting in their parents’ home district.

Yet another failed attempt by the alt-right to claim voter fraud where a perfectly rational explanation exists for their “clear cases of voter fraud”.

Conservatives are very limited in their thinking. How often do you see a question posted by a conservative with only two possible answers: You’re either in favour of the Wall or you support open borders. If you support reproductive choice, you favour abortion. It’s always either/or. If you oppose voter ID laws, you oppose election security.

You can oppose the Wall and open borders. There are OTHER ways of dealing with the Souther Border.

Any form of government issued ID is adequate for voting. Republicans are willing to spend $100 million dollars on voter ID, and nothing on ensuring EVERY American citizen can easily register to vote, and vote. Instead of making voting harder and harder, you should be making it easier.

Because of the pandemic, it was easier to vote in this election that in any previous election in American history. It’s no accident that this election has the highest turn out of the electorate in American history. Every oversight board called it the fairest safest election in American history. What happened this time should be replicated and enhanced.

Instead the republican party is seeking to limit who can vote, when they can vote and how they can vote because they lost. Instead of coming up with programs and policies to appeal to a wider swath of the electorate, Republicans have chosen to try to lie and cheat.

 

[candycorn]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

Azog got a bit too personal so I put him on ignore a while back....I had forgotten all about him.

 

[Rigby5]

This claim seems pretty credible, and the full article goes into a lot more detail than the excerpt that I'm posting.

The mainstream media has not debunked this claim.

Anatomy of an investigation into a non-investigation - Santa Barbara News-Press

May 30, 2021

Approximately 3,000 mail-in ballots counted in the Nov. 3 election were supposedly cast by UCSB students residing in a voting precinct that, along with other dorm buildings, includes the Francisco Torres/Santa Catalina Residence Hall at 6850 El Colegio Road in Goleta.

Problem: Due to COVID-19, the Torres Building, which normally accommodates 1,300 students, was empty and locked down through most of 2020, as were all other UCSB dorms.

This means no students/voters were residing inside the Torres Building (nor any of the other dorms) during the election season.

It also means these ballots were fraudulent.

That’s because there’s a second problem: These ballots could not legally have been forwarded to students where they were actually living.

Why not?

Because forwarding ballots to alternative addresses is a felony.

Questions: Did someone at the Torres Building hijack ballots, mark and file them? Or did someone illegally forward the ballots to students living with their parents elsewhere?

THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Thomas Cole of Analytics 805, which monitors elections, uncovered the Goleta precinct’s voting irregularities during the course of his routine analysis. Alarmed by the phantom ballots he’d pinpointed, Mr. Cole called the Santa Barbara District Attorney’s Office for advice on how to file a criminal complaint alleging Fraud Corruption of the Voting Process.

The D.A.’s Office directed him to the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office.

Mr. Cole’s subsequent complaint, filed with the Sheriff’s Office, alleges that:

Someone in charge of the mail at the building illegally filled out those ballots for the students and sent all those ballots directly back to the election board, which is a felony.

Someone in charge of or with access to the ballots and signature machines simply ignored the phony signatures on the ballots returned from the Torres Building, which is a felony.

Or officials turned off the signature inspection machine.

Or officials lowered the threshold of the machine inspection on the Torres Building precinct ballots, thus allowing the approximate 3,000 fraudulent ballots to be counted, a felony.

Seems likely to be nonsense to me.
Sure the dorms were forced to be vacant.
But mail, like ballots would still be delivered.
And student would still pick up their mail.
And when they pick up ballots, they would likely fill them in and return them.

 

[candycorn]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

These full-time students were registered to vote in the precinct. If not for the pandemic they would’ve been living in the dorms. They were simply away from their residences waiting for them to reopen but having paid tuition they were still entitled to live there. Therefore they were still entitled to vote there since they haven’t moved, unless they were voting in their parents’ home district.

Yet another failed attempt by the alt-right to claim voter fraud where a perfectly rational explanation exists for their “clear cases of voter fraud”.

Conservatives are very limited in their thinking. How often do you see a question posted by a conservative with only two possible answers: You’re either in favour of the Wall or you support open borders. If you support reproductive choice, you favour abortion. It’s always either/or. If you oppose voter ID laws, you oppose election security.

You can oppose the Wall and open borders. There are OTHER ways of dealing with the Souther Border.

Any form of government issued ID is adequate for voting. Republicans are willing to spend $100 million dollars on voter ID, and nothing on ensuring EVERY American citizen can easily register to vote, and vote. Instead of making voting harder and harder, you should be making it easier.

Because of the pandemic, it was easier to vote in this election that in any previous election in American history. It’s no accident that this election has the highest turn out of the electorate in American history. Every oversight board called it the fairest safest election in American history. happened this time should be replicated and enhanced.

Instead the republican party is seeking to limit who can vote, when they can vote and how they can vote because they lost. Instead of coming up with programs and policies to appeal to a wider swath of the electorate, Republicans have chosen to try to lie and cheat.

I think it should be investigated. However the guy bringing it up seems to be a bit of a kook. They always seem to be middle aged white dudes with beards who wear funny hats for some reason.

Still...this seems like something that should be investigated.

 

[Rigby5]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

Wrong.
You do not have to live in your legal residency, and can establish that anywhere you want, a long as you don't claim 2 of them as being your single voting residence.
Those in the military or contractors have to deal with this all the time.
Were you actually reside and where you declare your legal residency do not at all have to be the same.
For example, I could be stationed overseas and residing there.
But then I would not be able to vote if that was my official residency, so I always at least get a US post office box.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

Azog got a bit too personal so I put him on ignore a while back....I had forgotten all about him.

Too personal? Lmao!!!! Snowflake…this is from someone who calls out ex president “blob”

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

Nope. Its not. You’re an overt antisemite and I do not put you on ignore. Why? I am not a fan of cancel culture.

 

[eddiew37]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

Nope. Its not. You’re an overt antisemite and I do not put you on ignore. Why? I am not a fan of cancel culture.

AZOG the Israeli spy speaks

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

An audit of California would, ultimately, be a complete waste of time. Even if Biden got six times the number of votes that there are US citizens in California or one, the 55 EVs were always going to go to him.

It only makes sense to audit swing states.

Strange how none of the blob supporters are demanding audits in states where the blob won.

You guys ARE for election security right?

I've always been a fan of "The Blob" ... The 1958 version, not the terrible 1988 remake ... I consider it one of Steve McQueen's best roles and it was a high-water mark in cinematic horror / sci fi ... but, I don't see what that has to do with election audits.

View attachment 500374

I guess when you got nothing to counter with, you have to resort to satire....

When you have nothing to counter with you put people on ignore like a coward. I prefer satire. Especially when your corpse is our president.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put someone who has nothing to contribute to the discussions, on ignore. Other than worshipping Trump, lying, insulting other posters, what knowledge, insight, or sanity have you ever contributed to a discussion?

Trumpy and worship and hatred of anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is all you have. That’s why I call you a FuckBoi.

Nope. Its not. You’re an overt antisemite and I do not put you on ignore. Why? I am not a fan of cancel culture.

AZOG the Israeli spy speaks

You’re still alive? Ugh world will be a better place when you’re not, traitor.

 

[Dragonlady]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

These full-time students were registered to vote in the precinct. If not for the pandemic they would’ve been living in the dorms. They were simply away from their residences waiting for them to reopen but having paid tuition they were still entitled to live there. Therefore they were still entitled to vote there since they haven’t moved, unless they were voting in their parents’ home district.

Yet another failed attempt by the alt-right to claim voter fraud where a perfectly rational explanation exists for their “clear cases of voter fraud”.

Conservatives are very limited in their thinking. How often do you see a question posted by a conservative with only two possible answers: You’re either in favour of the Wall or you support open borders. If you support reproductive choice, you favour abortion. It’s always either/or. If you oppose voter ID laws, you oppose election security.

You can oppose the Wall and open borders. There are OTHER ways of dealing with the Souther Border.

Any form of government issued ID is adequate for voting. Republicans are willing to spend $100 million dollars on voter ID, and nothing on ensuring EVERY American citizen can easily register to vote, and vote. Instead of making voting harder and harder, you should be making it easier.

Because of the pandemic, it was easier to vote in this election that in any previous election in American history. It’s no accident that this election has the highest turn out of the electorate in American history. Every oversight board called it the fairest safest election in American history. happened this time should be replicated and enhanced.

Instead the republican party is seeking to limit who can vote, when they can vote and how they can vote because they lost. Instead of coming up with programs and policies to appeal to a wider swath of the electorate, Republicans have chosen to try to lie and cheat.

I think it should be investigated. However the guy bringing it up seems to be a bit of a kook. They always seem to be middle aged white dudes with beards who wear funny hats for some reason.

Still...this seems like something that should be investigated.

The explanation is simple: The students had the absentee ballots sent to whatever address they are staying at while the dorms are closed. The voter's registered address is the dorm, but you would need to look at where the address on the absentee ballot request. Since close to 10,000 students live in those dorms, a 30% of the students requesting ballots and voting isn't out of line.

 

[candycorn]

As usual, you are being played by right wing fake news counting on your lack of knowledge of how voting and absentee ballots work.

When people order an absentee ballot, they order it from the precinct they are registered to vote in.

Their vote counts in the precinct they are registered in, the absentee ballot is sent to where the voter is temporarily staying that the voter requested it to be sent.

The article tries to fool you, implying ballots were sent to the dorm, but the info only tells them, that the voters are registered in that precinct, not that the ballots were mailed there.

Every absentee ballot counted has a signature verification as well....

Thus the article is once again, FAKE NEWS.

When people go to college and live in a dorm---they are only there temporarily but are allowed to vote there because they live there for school. If they weren't living in the dorms, then they legally can not vote in that district.

These full-time students were registered to vote in the precinct. If not for the pandemic they would’ve been living in the dorms. They were simply away from their residences waiting for them to reopen but having paid tuition they were still entitled to live there. Therefore they were still entitled to vote there since they haven’t moved, unless they were voting in their parents’ home district.

Yet another failed attempt by the alt-right to claim voter fraud where a perfectly rational explanation exists for their “clear cases of voter fraud”.

Conservatives are very limited in their thinking. How often do you see a question posted by a conservative with only two possible answers: You’re either in favour of the Wall or you support open borders. If you support reproductive choice, you favour abortion. It’s always either/or. If you oppose voter ID laws, you oppose election security.

You can oppose the Wall and open borders. There are OTHER ways of dealing with the Souther Border.

Any form of government issued ID is adequate for voting. Republicans are willing to spend $100 million dollars on voter ID, and nothing on ensuring EVERY American citizen can easily register to vote, and vote. Instead of making voting harder and harder, you should be making it easier.

Because of the pandemic, it was easier to vote in this election that in any previous election in American history. It’s no accident that this election has the highest turn out of the electorate in American history. Every oversight board called it the fairest safest election in American history. happened this time should be replicated and enhanced.

Instead the republican party is seeking to limit who can vote, when they can vote and how they can vote because they lost. Instead of coming up with programs and policies to appeal to a wider swath of the electorate, Republicans have chosen to try to lie and cheat.

I think it should be investigated. However the guy bringing it up seems to be a bit of a kook. They always seem to be middle aged white dudes with beards who wear funny hats for some reason.

Still...this seems like something that should be investigated.

The explanation is simple: The students had the absentee ballots sent to whatever address they are staying at while the dorms are closed. The voter's registered address is the dorm, but you would need to look at where the address on the absentee ballot request. Since close to 10,000 students live in those dorms, a 30% of the students requesting ballots and voting isn't out of line.

I like your explanation. I'd prefer to hear it from someone actually investigating though.

 

[Kondor3]

This settles it - Trump won California!

No one said that asswipe....

Then if Rump didn't win then Who Cares?

 

[Rambunctious]

This settles it - Trump won California!

No one said that asswipe....

Then if Rump didn't win then Who Cares?

No one cares about California....