In 2020, God finally lost his patience with us and that's why all this bad stuff is happening

[Weatherman2020]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

 

[surada]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

You want gay people to die?

 

[Weatherman2020]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

You want gay people to die?

Abortion is just a lump of tissue.

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

We should just give the whole world an IQ test, and anyone outside the top 10% gets sterilized.

 

[Weatherman2020]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

We should just give the whole world an IQ test, and anyone outside the top 10% gets sterilized.

That’s easy. We can start with those that think socialism works.

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

I wish they’d find that homosexual gene so we could start aborting the defectives.

We should just give the whole world an IQ test, and anyone outside the top 10% gets sterilized.

That’s easy. We can start with those that think socialism works.

I don't think that you get the concept of an IQ test. Maybe we should start with you.

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

Then that means you believe being gay is genetic.

The reality is that on one end of the spectrum are some men born being more effeminate than others and some women being born more masculine than others (genetics) and are naturally attracted to the same sex. On the other end of the spectrum some become attracted to the same sex through their environment (nurture). Everything else is some combination of the two.

You are too dumb to be able to process this.

 

[ding]

All I know is that people are born gay.

Can you provide a link?

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

I do believe that the many guys and gals that are "gay" were turned gay by sexual perversion (nurture). Some though, a relatively small percentage, are so obviously gay that there must be some genetic influence (nature).

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

Then that means you believe being gay is genetic.

The reality is that on one end of the spectrum are some men born being more effeminate than others and some women being born more masculine than others (genetics) and are naturally attracted to the same sex. On the other end of the spectrum some become attracted to the same sex through their environment (nurture). Everything else is some combination of the two.

You are too dumb to be able to process this.

You’re too dumb to link me.

 

[Taz]

All I know is that people are born gay.

Can you provide a link?

The 'Gay Gene' Is A Myth But Being Gay Is 'Natural,' Say Scientists

 

[Taz]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

I do believe that the many guys and gals that are "gay" were turned gay by sexual perversion (nurture). Some though, a relatively small percentage, are so obviously gay that there must be some genetic influence (nature).

Other than in jail, you’re crazy.

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

I do believe that the many guys and gals that are "gay" were turned gay by sexual perversion (nurture). Some though, a relatively small percentage, are so obviously gay that there must be some genetic influence (nature).

Other than in jail, you’re crazy.

Nope. In everyday society.

 

[ding]

All I know is that people are born gay.

Can you provide a link?

The 'Gay Gene' Is A Myth But Being Gay Is 'Natural,' Say Scientists

You should actually read the links you pst, dummy.

“There’s a lot of room for nongenetic effects,” Bailey told Science News. Coauthor Benjamin Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and the Broad Institute, agreed. The study, he said, makes clear both biology and one’s environment may be a factor that influences sexuality. What does he mean by "environmental"? A range of experiences in a person's development as well as social and cultural factors that all could affect behavior, Neale said.

 

[ding]

people are born gay.

Some are but most aren't.

Why would someone fake that? Never mind why, how could someone who is into chick say to himself, I'm going to do guys instead.

That makes NO sense at all.

The question was not about faking, you disingenuous twit. The question was were they BORN that way.

If they aren't born gay, then they'd have to be faking their gayness. Pretty simple really. And impossible.

It's nature versus nurture, dummy. Not nature versus fake.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.

www.pbs.org

I never claimed there was a gay gene. So, another EPIC FAIL! on your part.

So being born gay does not mean genetics?

You are pretty stupid, dude. Seriously.

All I know is that people are born gay. If you think that hetero guys are going around packing fudge in huge numbers for whatever weird reason you have, then you're getting nuttier by the day.

Then that means you believe being gay is genetic.

The reality is that on one end of the spectrum are some men born being more effeminate than others and some women being born more masculine than others (genetics) and are naturally attracted to the same sex. On the other end of the spectrum some become attracted to the same sex through their environment (nurture). Everything else is some combination of the two.

You are too dumb to be able to process this.

You’re too dumb to link me.

You are too dumb to read the links you provide.

“There’s a lot of room for nongenetic effects,” Bailey told Science News. Coauthor Benjamin Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and the Broad Institute, agreed. The study, he said, makes clear both biology and one’s environment may be a factor that influences sexuality. What does he mean by "environmental"? A range of experiences in a person's development as well as social and cultural factors that all could affect behavior, Neale said.

The 'Gay Gene' Is A Myth But Being Gay Is 'Natural,' Say Scientists

"The research reinforces the understanding that same-sex sexual behavior is simply “a natural part of our diversity as a species.”

www.forbes.com

 

[The Original Tree]

Atheists will laugh......of course......

But it does stand to reason

Atheists are part of the problem.

They haughtily declare that man doesn't need God, but everything we see proves the opposite.

Look at Russia and China, both atheist countries.

Would you want to live in either?

I'm what's called a "troubled believer".

I give God credit for creation and all things.
Unfortunately, that includes a history of unbelievable horrors and evil on his planet Earth.

I cannot reconcile 3 year old babies being raped.
For that matter......why do Earth's creatures ALL need to kill another creature to survive? What a brutal creation.
The amount of Terror and horror that takes place on this planet every day defies a loving deity.

The short answer to your troubled mind is that we are in a fallen world. Adam forfeited his crown and throne to Lucifer. Lucifer is the god of this World now and has been ever since he caused the fall of man.

The Creator is Lord over all the Universe, but The Earth is a bit of enemy territory by a contractual obligation via Adam forfeiting his birthright.
When God gets involved in things on Earth, it is like an invasion. This is also why we are told to occupy. That is because we are to take enemy ground and hold it, until Christ comes.

Christ took the first steps in winning that back by leaving heaven and His throne to come in the form of man as The Second Adam, but the process is not finished.

The issue still remains though that The Title, Crown and Throne will not be transferred until The Father is satisfied with the number of true believers he has gathered in to the Son's Sheepfold. When that number and that day, that not even The Son knows is fulfilled, then the first seal on the deed to Earth will be broken and along with it the 1st seal judgment will be released on Lucifer, and his kingdom and all those who follow him, and so on and so forth until all the seals are broken, and The Deed is fully read and entered in to the record of the Court of Heaven and all the Judgments upon the usurper and his kingdom are completed.

That Land Deed or Title is the scroll in The Book of Revelation.

Once Christ Returns, the Earth will be restored as it once was, and the entire Earth will become as The Garden of Eden, and Christ will sit upon the throne as The Second Adam.