Defiant1
Gold Member
- Mar 23, 2010
- 7,579
- 1,187
- 290
They are investigating! Lol calm down, you should be asking what qualified Joe Biden son to get the job he did .. when that’s answered then let’s talk impeachment or are you scared ? Why do you cover for democrats? Are you a one rule party?Joe Biden shouldn’t have used his position in Ukraine to make his loser son money,, trump just blew the whistleThat’s not it of bounds,, he’s trying to investigate corruption.. it’s his job.. sorry little man stomp your feet again it’s going To be a long 6 years
No he's not. He just wants something to point to at his rallies. A public announcement of an investigation of his opponent is all he thinks he needs to hawk all the rubes he has on his side. He couldn't careless if the accusations are true, just that there are allegations. Worked out well for him in 2016, in that all the Rubes will still swear she is as guilty as a criminal can be.
Trump blew Putin- not his whistle.
You have proof that Joe Biden committed any crimes- lets see it.
Meanwhile- Joe Biden acted in accordance to official U.S. policy, with the support of the Senate and the EU.
Trump acted in secrecy as part of his own policy to benefit himself politically
Who is investigating? I mean other than Donald Trump's personal lawyer?
What qualified Joe Biden's son for the job he got? It appears nothing more than his name.
What qualified Donald Trump Jr. to get the job he got? His name.
Personally, I think that the company that hired Biden was stupid- but there is no evidence that any crime was broken and I don't know why you think that Joe Biden was supposed to prevent his son from taking such a lucrative offer. I think that the hiring of Hunter Biden was an example of how companies hire unqualified people for their name power- and I would love to hear your thoughts on how such things could be stopped- or whether they should be.
If you have any evidence that either Hunter or Joe Biden did anything illegal- well share with us. You have evidence of a crime- actual evidence- I will support an investigation regardless of the party.
And I assume you are supporting the impeachment investigation- right? Because you aren't scared of an investigation- right?
You don't believe a private lawyer has a right to investigate for his client?