Impeachment inquiry off to a great start for the Repubs...

[marvin martian]

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later." - Michael McCaul (R-TX), impeachment inquiry member.

Sumbuddy a'bring me more fishin' poles, dammit!

 

[g5000]

Former President Donald Trump’s fourth indictment​

​

Uh, listen, Gym. I'm fresh out of Biden hoaxes. You have any more up your ass?

 

[marvin martian]

Former President Donald Trump’s fourth indictment​

​

Uh, listen, Gym. I'm fresh out of Biden hoaxes. You have any more up your ass?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What has Turley been elected to? Oh, he is not an elected official?

Correct, he is the expert witness the elected officials from your beloved party called to testify in the inquiry

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You left out the rest of that sentence.


"...but i do think there is enough evidence to warrent an impeachment inquiry"

Why did you leave that part out?

Because it is not relevant.

 

[Godboy]

Because it is not relevant.

You said the inquiry is off to a bad start and suggested that Turley said there wasnt enough evidence for it. The second part of that sentence is pretty important for context, dont you think?

 

[Blaster]

Democrats looked foolish trying to defend Joe Biden. I was laughing out loud.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You said the inquiry is off to a bad start and suggested that Turley said there wasnt enough evidence for it. The second part of that sentence is pretty important for context, dont you think?

Nope. As there is no standard at all for starting an impeachment inquirey.

Though, I guess in a way it is important, it is basically Turely saying this is a witch hunt looking for evidence that they do not have yet.

 

[Blaster]

Nope. As there is no standard at all for starting an impeachment inquirey.

Though, I guess in a way it is important, it is basically Turely saying this is a witch hunt looking for evidence that they do not have yet.

A weak reply with poor spelling.

 

[Godboy]

Nope. As there is no standard at all for starting an impeachment inquirey.

Though, I guess in a way it is important, it is basically Turely saying this is a witch hunt looking for evidence that they do not have yet.

That isnt what Hurley said at all. Is it even possible to have a slightly honest discussion at USMB with the opposition? It seems like everyone argues with bad faith and no intellectual honesty.

 

[marvin martian]

Nope. As there is no standard at all for starting an impeachment inquirey.

Though, I guess in a way it is important, it is basically Turely saying this is a witch hunt looking for evidence that they do not have yet.

He said the inquiry is warranted. Why lie?

 

[lantern2814]

Changes nothing. What is the threshold for an impeachment inquiry other than "we want to do it"?

High crimes and misdemeanors. Plenty of proof already found of that. But keep turning a blind eye to your savior Xiden’s corruption...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That isnt what Hurley said at all. Is it even possible to have a slightly honest discussion at USMB with the opposition? It seems like everyone argues with bad faith and no intellectual honesty.

That was the implication.

The inquiry is looking for evidence that is worthy of an impeachment because they have none now.

 

[lantern2814]

They already had subpoena power you dunce.....

And the audacity one must have to talk about subpoena power while simping for folks who ignored subpoenas...

Whether it is Gym Jordan who is still in contempt of ignoring a subpoena

Or Peter Navarro or Steve Bannon who are both guilty of ignoring a subpoena...

But now you care about subpoena power? Get the fuck out of here

Noting you leave out Obozo and his wingman Holder who both ignored subpoenas. Not so much fun when the opposition does it to you is it?

 

[lantern2814]

Former President Donald Trump’s fourth indictment​

​

Uh, listen, Gym. I'm fresh out of Biden hoaxes. You have any more up your ass?

Pathetic deflection attempt noted. Stay on topic retard. It’s not your Stage 4 TDS and ignorance.

 

[Godboy]

That was the implication.

The inquiry is looking for evidence that is worthy of an impeachment because they have none now.

The implication was, there is a lot of concerning evidence that needs to be investigated. That is Hurley's position in a nutshell. No spin, no dishonesty, that is his position 100%.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

Republicans won’t allow the facts to get in the way of their lies.

 

[marvin martian]

Republicans won’t allow the facts to get in the way of their lies.

You got duped. Again. lol

 

[lantern2814]

Because it is not relevant.

Yes it is relevant you dishonest lying hack. You intentionally misquoted Turley in a sad attempt to protect your beloved Dims.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

High crimes and misdemeanors. Plenty of proof already found of that. But keep turning a blind eye to your savior Xiden’s corruption...

The ‘inquiry’ is completely devoid of fact and merit; its motive is solely partisan – rightwing political theater.