Impeachment inquiry off to a great start for the Repubs...

[Harpy Eagle]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

 

[Crepitus]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

Damn, if they can't convince Turly of all people they might as well just quit.

 

[IM2]

 

[okfine]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

Hah Ha Ha!
Big... I mean HUGE LETDOWN!

 

[TNHarley]

Turley was against trumps impeachment as well.
We see how that turned out.

 

[Mac1958]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

Well, as long as they have MAGA media screaming about it, they're happy.

Proving stuff is too hard. It's just better to stay angry.

 

[okfine]

Who will their next bright star witness be?

 

[Mac1958]

All these guys talk a big game when they're being interviewed by MAGA media, then suddenly become quiet little bunnies when they're in official proceedings.

When they're not pleading the Fifth, anyway.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Who will their next bright star witness be?

rudy

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Turley was against trumps impeachment as well.
We see how that turned out.

Yep, Trump was acquitted twice by the Senate

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I wonder why the House GOP are so against calling Rudy to the hearing to testify.....







I thought he was one of the central figures to gathering all of this evidence...so why oppose him coming in? Even the Dems are wanting to bring him, this is the perfect time to own the libs and have Rudy show all the evidence

 

[TNHarley]

Yep, Trump was acquitted twice by the Senate

LOL ok. Sorry for interrupting your circle jerk.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

LOL ok. Sorry for interrupting your circle jerk.

Did the Dems call Turly as one of their star witnesses?

 

[BackAgain]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

So?

You don’t grasp a thing about nuance.

Current evidence. In other words, based solely on what is known at this moment, Turley disagrees there is enough to impeach.

Ok. That’s not the same as saying that there isn’t enough to commence an impeachment investigation.

In fact (so odd that you left this part out):

While he conceded there was no evidence to support impeachment, Turley did say that he believed the House had “passed the threshold” for holding an inquiry

From the same article you cited. You hack.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

So?

You don’t grasp a thing about nuance.

Current evidence. In other words, based solely on what is known at this moment, Turley disagrees there is enough to impeach.

Ok. That’s not the same as saying that there isn’t enough to commence an impeachment investigation.

In fact (so odd that you left this part out):


From the same article you cited. You hack.

You also left out the part that none of the witnesses presented today had ANYTHING NEW to offer


This is theater for the entertainment of easily manipulated morons....



and if anyone looks at this Republican and feels he is going to be the one to "get Joe Biden" -- then yall are more pathetic than I thought...

 

[martybegan]

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

Star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley...“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Good job Repubs!

His whole statement:

"I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment... But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry."


As usual leaving out context.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

His whole statement:

"I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment... But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry."


As usual leaving out context.

Changes nothing. What is the threshold for an impeachment inquiry other than "we want to do it"?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

His whole statement:

"I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment... But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry."


As usual leaving out context.

There is no threshold for an impeachment inquiry, remember?


Trump "passed the threshold" for both an impeachment inquiry, an impeachment hearing and articles of impeachment being passed by the House....did that mean the impeachable offenses he was accused were real to you? Fuck no

So why do you expect Democrats or anyone else to give a fuck about this dog and pony show?

 

[playtime]

Who will their next bright star witness be?

^ him ^

 

[martybegan]

Changes nothing. What is the threshold for an impeachment inquiry other than "we want to do it"?

That's according to Democrats. Evidently Turley has more scruples.