SeaMajor7
Diamond Member
I know you're a pussy with me on ignore, but just for the record, you can SHOVE your bullshit narrative up your ASS!!!!!Wait.........the Orange Rapist told you to think that didn't he? You get a cookie.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know you're a pussy with me on ignore, but just for the record, you can SHOVE your bullshit narrative up your ASS!!!!!Wait.........the Orange Rapist told you to think that didn't he? You get a cookie.
But on page 117, the text lists exceptions to the “mandatory” trigger, including a catch-all — “a process approved by the Secretary” exemption:(3) ACTIVATIONS OF AUTHORITY.—
‘‘(A) DISCRETIONARY ACTIVATION.—The Secretary may activate the border emergency authority if, during a period of 7 consecutive calendar days, there is an average of 4,000 or more aliens who are encountered each day.
(B) MANDATORY [emphasis added] ACTIVATION.—The Secretary shall activate the border emergency authority if—
‘‘(i) during a period of 7 consecutive calendar days, there is an average of 5,000 or more aliens who are encountered each day; or
‘‘(ii) on any 1 calendar day, a combined total of 8,500 or more aliens are encountered.
(C) An unaccompanied alien child.
(D) An alien who an immigration officer determines, with the approval of a supervisory immigration officer, should be excepted from the border emergency authority based on the totality of the circumstances …
(F) An alien who has a valid visa or other lawful permission to enter the United States, including— … (iv) an alien who presents at a port of entry pursuant to a process approved by the Secretary to allow for safe and orderly entry into the United States.
/----/ That "certain number of illegals" crossing the border is 5,000 a day. Who are you trying to kid?![]()
Senate Negotiators Unveil Bipartisan Legislation To Fix The Border
"If it’s good for the country but bad for Donald Trump, what do you choose?" Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy said in urging Republicans to support the legislation.www.huffpost.com
And it is as we have been saying. The most forceful immigration bill in decades.
Will Republicans sign on to this? They claim they want the border “fixed”. Well here is that fix.
But former president and GOP frontrunner Donald Trump has reportedly put pressure on Republicans to torpedo the deal so that he can continue using the border crisis as a line of attack in his campaign.
In a Sunday interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Johnson denied that Trump had any outside influence: “He’s not calling the shots. I am calling the shots for the House.”![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Senate releases $118 billion bipartisan aid proposal for Israel, Ukraine, border security
Speaker Mike Johnson announced a House counterproposal to fund Israel alone, which the White House has deemed a political stunt.www.cnbc.com
Mike better apologize for saying that or Don will have him voted out of the Speaker's position.
Section (F) would exempt the “parole” migrants that Biden’s flunkies are importing despite the existing laws.circumstances …
(F) An alien who has a valid visa or other lawful permission to enter the United States, including— … (iv) an alien who presents at a port of entry pursuant to a process approved by the Secretary to allow for safe and orderly entry into the United States.
How does Trump’s disapproval make the bill worth a crap? It seems as though the only criteria you nimrods have is anything Trump and Republicans hate must be good and anything the Democrats(and our enemies) love must be good. Pure idiocy.
Lankford defends bipartisan border security bill after attacks by Trump, GOP
“This bill focuses on getting us to zero illegal crossings a day. There’s no amnesty. It increases the number of Border Patrol agents, increases asylum officers, it increases detention beds so we can quickly detain and then deport individuals,” Lankford said on “Fox News Sunday.”
“It focuses on additional deportation flights out. It changes our asylum process so that people get a fast asylum screening at a higher standard and then get returned back to their home country,” Lankford added.
Lankford called out his colleagues for bowing to political pressure, noting that four months ago Republicans refused to grant funding for Ukraine, Israel and the southern border until there were policy changes.
“So we actually locked arms together and said we’re not going to give you money for this. We want a change in law,” Lankford said. “When we’re finally going to the end, they’re like, ‘Oh, just kidding. I actually don’t want a change in law because it’s a presidential election year.’ We all have an oath to the Constitution and we have a commitment to say we’re going to do whatever we can to be able to secure the border.”
This is extremely straight forward. The bill goes a long way to addressing the issues at the border Repubs have been highlighting. Trump doesn't want to take immigration off the table as a cudgel against Biden so he told House Repubs to block the bill's passage. Full stop.
You're going to need a new billboard and avatar soon, asshole.Lankford defends bipartisan border security bill after attacks by Trump, GOP
“This bill focuses on getting us to zero illegal crossings a day. There’s no amnesty. It increases the number of Border Patrol agents, increases asylum officers, it increases detention beds so we can quickly detain and then deport individuals,” Lankford said on “Fox News Sunday.”
“It focuses on additional deportation flights out. It changes our asylum process so that people get a fast asylum screening at a higher standard and then get returned back to their home country,” Lankford added.
Lankford called out his colleagues for bowing to political pressure, noting that four months ago Republicans refused to grant funding for Ukraine, Israel and the southern border until there were policy changes.
“So we actually locked arms together and said we’re not going to give you money for this. We want a change in law,” Lankford said. “When we’re finally going to the end, they’re like, ‘Oh, just kidding. I actually don’t want a change in law because it’s a presidential election year.’ We all have an oath to the Constitution and we have a commitment to say we’re going to do whatever we can to be able to secure the border.”
This is extremely straight forward. The bill goes a long way to addressing the issues at the border Repubs have been highlighting. Trump doesn't want to take immigration off the table as a cudgel against Biden so he told House Repubs to block the bill's passage. Full stop.
Because they can say they tried, and then blame republicans for saying no to all the garbage contained withinWhy do Democrats do dog and pony shows? I wanted to read the bill. And it starts out dealing with military pay. Show us the part you want us to see.
/-----/ There is no need for the bill. Dementia Joe has all the power he needs. He just doesn't want to fix it.How does Trump’s disapproval make the bill worth a crap? It seems as though the only criteria you nimrods have is anything Trump and Republicans hate must be good and anything the Democrats(and our enemies) love must be good. Pure idiocy.
Again, we’ll see if Republicans actually want to address the border or do nothing so they can use ‘the border’ as a partisan wedge issue.Horse Apples.....
Well since the idiotic dems, have allowed it to be an issue since day one of the Biden admin, they are the ones playing politics, by trying to force a bad bill through right before an election, with horrible garbage in it to place blame elsewhere, that is what they always do!Again, we’ll see if Republicans actually want to address the border or do nothing so they can use ‘the border’ as a partisan wedge issue.
It will likely be the latter.
Again, we’ll see if Republicans actually want to address the border or do nothing so they can use ‘the border’ as a partisan wedge issue.
It will likely be the latter.