Now that we've got an adult in the room handling the investigation, why can't the Republicans let it rest until it's over? Why did Rexx need to goad the Dems with speculation about what they would argue about next when none of it has happened? I need a rest. Everyone needs a rest. Stop poking everyone with a stick to keep goading and feeding the flames. Just stop. I really thought last night that could happen. Almost everyone on this thread agrees it was a good idea. Just stop.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.This would be the best way to end this Trump/Russia dilemma. Maybe in two months, Robert Mueller comes before the national audience, gives us all of the details/conclusions of the case, and ends it with the fact that "He Couldn't Find Any Negative/Bad Intentions" from the President ???
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
GFYYou shouldn't hit her with reality. She doesn't like that.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
LolGFYYou shouldn't hit her with reality. She doesn't like that.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
See?
Yeah it does appear that YOU do need a "rest" since it's apparent that current events have flipped your "non sequitur babble" switch to the ON position.Now that we've got an adult in the room handling the investigation, why can't the Republicans let it rest until it's over? Why did Rexx need to goad the Dems with speculation about what they would argue about next when none of it has happened? I need a rest. Everyone needs a rest.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
Now that we've got an adult in the room handling the investigation, why can't the Republicans let it rest until it's over? Why did Rexx need to goad the Dems with speculation about what they would argue about next when none of it has happened? I need a rest. Everyone needs a rest. Stop poking everyone with a stick to keep goading and feeding the flames. Just stop. I really thought last night that could happen. Almost everyone on this thread agrees it was a good idea. Just stop.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
We could be like the republicans. If at first you don't succeed, investigate again and again and again and again and again and again and again...
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
That conclusion would not mean that Russian interference did not influence the election results, meaning the election of trump. It would just mean that required and sufficient evidence of American lawbreaking could not be sufficiently established to support an indictment and trial.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
That's exactly what I was doing. But a number of Bright Minds here decided that was wrong of me. Bunch of ******* dunces. But one guy was right--if y'all want to argue over shit that hasn't happened and how people are going to react to shit you're making up a year from now, that's your stupid choice.Now that we've got an adult in the room handling the investigation, why can't the Republicans let it rest until it's over? Why did Rexx need to goad the Dems with speculation about what they would argue about next when none of it has happened? I need a rest. Everyone needs a rest. Stop poking everyone with a stick to keep goading and feeding the flames. Just stop. I really thought last night that could happen. Almost everyone on this thread agrees it was a good idea. Just stop.Nope. Unless the Dems make the mistake of acting like the Republicans did when they didn't get Hillary thrown in jail for the server and for Benghazi and for CGI.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
Exactly the same way that they're responding now, there's no concrete evidence that's been brought to light NOW, why would Mueller saying that he's found no evidence change anything? After all they've already convicted President Twitter based on nothing more than allegations and have moved into right into the punishment phase (Impeachment talk).
IMHO the only thing that will silence the current Democrat Party criticism, innuendo and speculation is if Mueller's findings include exculpatory evidence.
The "Dems" are already "acting like the Republicans did", specifically they're trying to conflate allegations and speculation with actual evidence of wrongdoing. Exculpatory evidence blows that whole narrative up, a simple "absence/insufficient of incriminating evidence" allows the narrative to continue with all the attendant waste of time, money and effort that traditionally accompanies long, drawn out Washington scandals.
Unfortunately this particular attack vector that the Democrats are using carries the very real possibility that Big Chief Donald Duck will make overt moves that damage US-Russian relations just to *prove* he's not in "Russia's Pocket".
Perhaps because the left has been whining 24/7 about everything and nothing, simultaneously? There is to date not one shred of evidence to support any of this nonsense. It has been stated that there is no evidence that the Russians affected the outcome of the election or the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.
How about you guys let it go.
So you are admitting Hillary is incompetent?
If Mueller is as ethical and able as most seem to believe he is, he will simply conclude there is no evidence to support allegations of collusion and therefore intent would not be an issue. In fact, what he will probably also conclude is that there was nothing the Russian government did that was not normal for both the US and Russia to do. Keep in mind that Rosenstein's May 9 memo recommending firing Comey that foremost in his mind is repairing the grievous damage Comey did to the credibility of the FBI and the DoJ, not Russia or Trump, so to that end he chose Mueller to bring this investigation to a conclusion, something Comey clearly would never have done.
Now how do you all think Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrat Pansies will respond?
"He" in English denotes maleness, so NO!
