Imagine if Donald Trump orders his Department of Justice to defy all “unlawful” orders from Democrat judges. The media would declare a constitutional

[San Souci]

I just knew it would be too hard for you to answer a simple question without deflecting to another question. Pretzel logic.

And they ALWAYS say Racist or Fascist. BORING

 

[teddyearp]

And they ALWAYS say Racist or Fascist. BORING

No shit huh? Its like getting ******* old. And now they're shooting at us. All while blaming us. What ******* pretzel logic.

They're just asking for a war at this point. Pretty clear.

 

[San Souci]

No shit huh? Its like getting ******* old. And now they're shooting at us. All while blaming us. What ******* pretzel logic.

They're just asking for a war at this point. Pretty clear.

Yet THEIR side is looting ,burning ,car jacking , and shielding filthy Illegal vermin

 

[teddyearp]

Yet THEIR side is looting ,burning ,car jacking , and shielding filthy Illegal vermin

I'm sorry. I was talking about those who are shielding the illegals. So for me it is their side too. I've been doing the ballot box all my life, been doing the 'mailbox' for the last decade or so. Soon I reckong I may be forced to reach for the bullet box by these Democrat insurgents.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I'm trying to imagine how you can respond to me when you said you have me on ignore:


Lie much?

View attachment 1186138

I ask again...

Lie much?

Guilty: Trump becomes first former US president convicted of felony crimes

The verdict is a stunning legal reckoning for Trump and exposes him to potential prison time.

apnews.com

I ask again....
Lie Much?

I've demonstrated you've lied 3 times in this one post of yours.

Hes got me on ignore as well. Maga trash.

 

[San Souci]

I'm sorry. I was talking about those who are shielding the illegals. So for me it is their side too. I've been doing the ballot box all my life, been doing the 'mailbox' for the last decade or so. Soon I reckong I may be forced to reach for the bullet box by these Democrat insurgents.

I was active in "Tea Party"

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

Since you seem to think that anyone can determine what is unlawful by just declaring it so, then Trump and his administration can declare all circuit court rulings as 'unlawful' and ignore them.

I’m strangely comfortable with the idea.

 

[teddyearp]

I was active in "Tea Party"

I caucused for Ron Paul in 2012. He had much the same ideas as Trump is instilling, but the dingbat republicans said "He wasn't electable enough" and went with the looser Mitt Romney instead.

 

[j-mac]

I don't think we have to imagine it. He pretty much has done this...ignoring many orders from federal judges. Convicted felons routinely ignore judges orders. Trump being a convicted felon is doing what convicted felons do.

Not sure what your point is.

List the orders President Trump has ignored....Thanks.

 

[candycorn]

List the orders President Trump has ignored....Thanks.

See post 107. You’re welcome.

 

[San Souci]

I caucused for Ron Paul in 2012. He had much the same ideas as Trump is instilling, but the dingbat republicans said "He wasn't electable enough" and went with the looser Mitt Romney instead.

I was for Santorem.

 

[Delldude]

No, we are a nation with a child rapist and 34 count convicted felon as a leader. A nation now ran by felons, for felons, and by felons. And you are loving that.

Separation of powers.

 

[DGS49]

The Judicial Branch of government is not superior to the Executive Branch. Nothing in Article 3 gives Federal judges the "power" to negate or overturn the actions of the Executive. It is merely a custom that the Executive accedes to rulings of judges when to do so does not cause immediate harm. Again, there is nothing in the Constitution that demands the President's compliance. If the USSC reaches a conclusion that would nullify a President's actions or decrees, no President has yet defied it.

 

[Hafar1014]

Separation of powers.

The Bidens are no longer running the country

 

[Delldude]

If the USSC reaches a conclusion that would nullify a President's actions or decrees, no President has yet defied it.

Biden student loans, twice.

The President ignores the law again as he forgives more student debt. The total is now $138 billion and counting.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/joe-biden-student-debt-forgiveness-supreme-court-0c5204fe?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfbALtTsST_kazuVEL3FKxso2W4k-9AoDo6p7f7c4E7t_PNHAPArUDW_ZDMI9E%3D&gaa_ts=6948001e&gaa_sig=jFuBJ2dxnEx-7Fqc-q_F3ATBWWJjrm4j3sVM97cgrZNvmciZAc0GuvImHoUKcbH-7BHGZXKLMwyLRk0PEE6YLQ%3D%3D

 

[Delldude]

The Bidens are no longer running the country

Running or ruining?

 

[Hafar1014]

Running or ruining?

The damage is still in effect

 

[teddyearp]

The Judicial Branch of government is not superior to the Executive Branch. Nothing in Article 3 gives Federal judges the "power" to negate or overturn the actions of the Executive. It is merely a custom that the Executive accedes to rulings of judges when to do so does not cause immediate harm. Again, there is nothing in the Constitution that demands the President's compliance. If the USSC reaches a conclusion that would nullify a President's actions or decrees, no President has yet defied it.

Andrew Jackson?