Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,620
- 42,073
- 2,430
Jesus.
Your country's FUBAR.
<~~~~~~>
So what country do you represent? It certainly doesn't sound like the U.S.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jesus.
Your country's FUBAR.
What order was unlawful?Do you think unlawful orders should be obeyed?
I'll mark you down as 'yes' on that one, otherwise piggy wouldn't be squealing.
Quiet, piggy.
<~~~~~~>So what country do you represent? It certainly doesn't sound like the U.S.
I don't represent any country.<~~~~~~>So what country do you represent? It certainly doesn't sound like the U.S.
An example of an unlawful order is one that disobeys the rules of engagement or international law. US soldiers are notorious for disobeying international law. The one on torture, for instance.What order was unlawful?
ucmj.us
What orders? Have there been any?Orders that are unlawful to follow.
FFS!
Chump defines his own orders as illegal in another self own.
Taco taco man, Chump's gonna be a taco man.
An example of an unlawful order is one that disobeys the rules of engagement or international law. US soldiers are notorious for disobeying international law. The one on torture, for instance.
They are extremely unlikely to be prosecuted for it so they appear to treat it as usual practice, as do MAGAts. Do you not know your own country's laws?
A direct order becomes unlawful if executing it would lead to the violation of laws at the Federal, State, or UCMJ level.In the military, for instance, an order to engage in conduct that disobeys the rules of engagement or international law would be deemed unlawful, despite its direct nature from a superior.![]()
Direct Order vs Lawful Order: Understanding the Difference
Explore the crucial differences between direct and lawful orders in organizations like the military, and learn the importance of legal and ethical compliance. Understand the need for critical evaluation and the responsibility to question orders, with historical insights from the Nuremburg Trials.ucmj.us
I bet whoever was involved in executing the speed boat orders is not happy about it.
You people don't seem to appreciate you are showing the world exactly what you are.
Soldiers are obeying the law despite your wish they wouldn’t.I don't represent any country.
Especially not one that reacts in horror to soldiers being told to obey the law.
Does my location not show?
Still nothing from the vile left to indicate what ‘ illegal orders’ they are to defy.
Curious that you couch potato leftists are advocating that the military defy their oath of service while you sit on you fat behinds totally safe from consequences of your actions.
You’re a bunch of losers.
And what orders are those?Orders that are unlawful to follow.
FFS!
Probably willIt will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court applies the same standards of Presidential powers to future Democratic Presidents as they apply to Trump
So you still can’t tell me what law is being violated by the feds protecting ICE agents from anti-ice rioters.An example of an unlawful order is one that disobeys the rules of engagement or international law. US soldiers are notorious for disobeying international law. The one on torture, for instance.
They are extremely unlikely to be prosecuted for it so they appear to treat it as usual practice, as do MAGAts. Do you not know your own country's laws?
A direct order becomes unlawful if executing it would lead to the violation of laws at the Federal, State, or UCMJ level.In the military, for instance, an order to engage in conduct that disobeys the rules of engagement or international law would be deemed unlawful, despite its direct nature from a superior.![]()
Direct Order vs Lawful Order: Understanding the Difference
Explore the crucial differences between direct and lawful orders in organizations like the military, and learn the importance of legal and ethical compliance. Understand the need for critical evaluation and the responsibility to question orders, with historical insights from the Nuremburg Trials.ucmj.us
I bet whoever was involved in executing the speed boat orders is not happy about it.
You people don't seem to appreciate you are showing the world exactly what you are.
<~~~~~~>I don't represent any country.
Especially not one that reacts in horror to soldiers being told to obey the law.
Does my location not show?
Orders that are unlawful to obey.What orders? Have there been any?
Unlawful ones.And what are those supposed unlawful orders?
Did you see Chump define his own orders as illegal in his post?Your Chump derangement syndrome, Taco dysfunction is likely not treatable.
Since the US splurge of revenge hangings at Nuremberg.Since when did all military personnel get to decide what is legal and what is illegal? You act as if Trump has asked the military to do things that are clearly, by all counts, illegal. He hasn’t. Just because the average pink-haired Democrat thinks something is illegal doesn’t make it so.
Another fascist offended elected representatives could remind the military to obey the law.I see you too arfe on to go straigfht to name calling.
Please. Enumerate every single "illegal" order the President has given as commander in chief of the military and chief executive Officer of the executive branch.
<~~~~~~>Orders that are unlawful to obey.
From POTUS to soldiers? Sure, torturing captives. Shooting up boats on the high seas.
I'm sure such illegality bothers law and order MAGAts not at all, it's a feature not a bug for those creeps.
That's why they're incensed anyone could think such behaviour criminal.