Imagine if Donald Trump orders his Department of Justice to defy all “unlawful” orders from Democrat judges. The media would declare a constitutional

Since the US splurge of revenge hangings at Nuremberg.
<~~~~~~>
You're so fill of crap, it's running out your ears. Both France, the U.K, Russia and the U.S. were included in the tribunal processes
FYI:
The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the International Military Tribunal (IMT), which included judges from the four Allied nations: the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France. Each country provided one judge and one alternate judge for the proceedings.
In addition to the IMT, the United States conducted twelve subsequent Nuremberg trials from 1946 to 1949, focusing on various groups, including military leaders, doctors, and industrialists. These trials were held in the same courtroom as the IMT, with American judges presiding over the proceedings.

Red more:
xxxxxxxxxx​
xxxxxxxxxx​
xxxxxxxxxx​
 
Last edited:
When Trump actually obeys a court order it will be the same time hell freezes over.
<~~~~~~>
Bull crap...
In each case Trump has obeyed the law and then appealed to a higher court to adjudify the order.
In few cases Trump has lost when the decisions were appealed..
 
Do you think unlawful orders should be obeyed?

I'll mark you down as 'yes' on that one, otherwise piggy wouldn't be squealing.

Quiet, piggy.

You should realize that all of your opinions are idiotic.
 
I don't think we have to imagine it. He pretty much has done this...ignoring many orders from federal judges. Convicted felons routinely ignore judges orders. Trump being a convicted felon is doing what convicted felons do.

Not sure what your point is.

It's the top of your head.
 
Orders that are unlawful to obey.

From POTUS to soldiers? Sure, torturing captives. Shooting up boats on the high seas.

I'm sure such illegality bothers law and order MAGAts not at all, it's a feature not a bug for those creeps.

That's why they're incensed anyone could think such behaviour criminal.
Torturing what captives?

Your crying for the drug traffickers in boats on the high seas is something you will have to live with.

Go to your assigned cry corner and let it all out.
 
Orders that are unlawful to obey.

From POTUS to soldiers? Sure, torturing captives. Shooting up boats on the high seas.

I'm sure such illegality bothers law and order MAGAts not at all, it's a feature not a bug for those creeps.

That's why they're incensed anyone could think such behaviour criminal.
<~~~~~~>​
Do you have any evidence that Trump, has ordered any agency or the military torture captives or shoot innocent fishing boats on the high seas?
Please produce the evidence or STFU.
The semi-submersible and high speed boats in question were criminally smuggling either or both cocaine or fentanyl narcotics to the U.S. That is factual and without doubt. After action evidence has proved that fact.
Unlike presidents and CIA before Trump there are no torture black sites in use today.
Read more:

1763958075817.webp

xxxxxxxxxx
1763957883028.webp

xxxxxxxxxx
1763958158662.webp
 
Last edited:
Unlike presidents and CIA before Trump there are no torture black sites in use today.
Evidence that US soldiers obey illegal orders when they should know better. So they need to be reminded.

Those shooting up the boats will be very pissed at their superiors.
 
Do you think unlawful orders should be obeyed?

I'll mark you down as 'yes' on that one, otherwise piggy wouldn't be squealing.

Quiet, piggy.
<~~~~~~>
 
Evidence that US soldiers obey illegal orders when they should know better. So they need to be reminded.

Those shooting up the boats will be very pissed at their superiors.
<~~~~~~>

Bull Crap... When all U.S recruit goes through basic training that's one of the important things you are drilled on. It doesn't matter what branch of service.
Since you're not an American and never served in the U.S. military you obviously don't know.
BTW, international law also supports the legality of the Caribbean Operation. Article 51 of the U.N. Charter permits states to use force in self-defense against armed attacks and National Security. Fast boats and submersible boats are legitimate targets due to their role in smuggling narcotics and weapons into the U.S.and their ongoing threat to national security of America
 
Last edited:
How can you ignore the evidence of those soldiers torturing captives?

Oh. Exceptional American. Right.

Wherever you are from, it is second rate to the US. Jealously isn't becoming of you.
 
15th post
Oh, you know, minor things like shooting civilians for exercising their 1st Amendment rights. If you are so ignorant of what the Japanese and Germans soldiers did in WW2, then there is no use in explaining why those rules were adapted in 1950.
Does first amendment "Rights" include looting ,jacking cars ,throwing bottles and rocks? All you filthy Dems hide behind the 1st.
 
Can anyone imagine what the auto pen administration would have done if six republican congress persons made a video inferring the military to refuse the jab?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom