Being that an event like this, that is, two fuel-laden wide bodied jets have NEVER stuck modern skyscrapers before, I don't think ANYONE knows for sure what the physics of such an event are. Even the engineers that designed the building.
There have been studies and calculations done on the fuel loads, and fire temps that don't jive with the collapses, nor the straight down manner of the descents, nor the rapid times of collapse. Even NIST had to change the fuel loads they sited in the WTC7 report when it flaws were pointed out to them, and the fire tests, and the fire proofing tests were less then scientific, or accurate.
Ever wonder why the media, and others were saying that WTC7 was going to be the next building to fall down? Why did the BBC and CNN, have reporters on air claiming that WTC7 was collapsing when it clearly was NOT?
How come they seemed to know it was going to collapse, but it took years to figure out (an excuse) as to WHY it actually did?
Even bin Laden was surprised.
OBL was surprised, as he flat out denied responsibility for the attacks, and the FBI had no proof of his involvement.
Perhaps, it's likely that all the reports of "bombs going off"' are misunderstood phenomena related to the impact/collapse of the structure itself? I think THAT is more likely the case.
The secondary explosions were not looked into, nor the witnesses who spoke of them taken seriously, and at first explosions were denied even to have occurred by many OCTAs here and elsewhere.
People like the idea of conspiracies and hidden plots being revealed. I think that, years from now, facts will show that the two towers collapsed BECAUSE of the planes hitting them, it was NOT an controlled implosion.
The official story is of itself a conspiracy theory with wild speculations, and highly improbable events, extreme luck by the alleged hijackers, and laws of physics that does not stand up to scrutiny when looked at objectively, and scientifically.
Just yesterday a reporter who worked in Chicago, (Carol Marin) who was there on 9-11, wrote an article about how she was saved on that day, in it she stated that a fireball explosion occurred, and then the building "melted" and collapsed. This is total nonsense but is what is being put into the trough to be eaten up by people who do not think any deeper then what they are told to.
9/11 is the biggest event in our life time, and yet here we sit a decade later, and the average American has not put any logical thought into what happened that day. For the most part, Americans were driven by emotional, almost animalistic, herd mentality into multiple wars, loss of liberties and explosive generational debt. We were driven by the fear of Mushroom Clouds and Weapons of Mass Destruction that were only found in our minds. When I look back at how much our world has changed over the past decade since 9/11, it is astounding to me how much death and debt could have been avoided if we just came face to face with reality.
“It is said that men go mad in herds, and only come to their senses slowly, and one by one.” -Charles MacKay
A Decade of Denial and Deception | Don't Tread On Me
There are other things like what areas the hijacked planes were in, and the times the transponders were turned off, and why would a hijacker risk flying around for over an hour when they could have flown directly to their targets.
These are questions that considering the perps lack of expertise, and knowledge of radar tracking, and general piloting skills, have to be asked and investigated deeper.
The debate of 9-11 and the questioning of what happened and what was officially said about the events, is not for people who only skim through the BS talking points, ALTHOUGH this is where it begins, and where it started to fall apart for the tellers of the 9-11 conspiracy story.
From the "melted steel" and the "obvious" "jet fuel" fire temps, to the rest of the exaggerated talking points designed to deceive the naive public, along with the ever popular nonsense of 'thousands of people involved, someone would have spoken out by now" crap.
I find it strange when asked for proof, they themselves offer no concrete proof for what they themselves believe. There is massive proof that the OCT is flawed, and inaccurate, as is many aspects of our governments stories in the past ie: Vietnam, WMDs, Iran Contra,
and a host of other shit we were told at the time, but found out later
was not accurate.
Both sides of the arguments have to be looked at and scrutinized fully, where many people just say that the History channel, or Popular Mechanics have "debunked" the "conspiracy" and are satisfied with their versions, despite the obvious flaws and BS.
A big contradiction is since it was proven that the fire temps couldn't have "melted" the steel as was first widely regurgitated by the media, and highly educated engineers, then the fact of the very high recorded, and witnessed rubble fires demand an answer. Instead this fact is denied.
It has been shown that it simply is not scientifically possible to collapse and pulverize 3 buildings with 2 planes, while achieving 10 and 7 second decent rates (one actually producing free fall acceleration) with "jet fuel" and gravity alone, and 19 A-rabs with minimal commercial airliner flight training, box cutters as the culprits.[/QUOTE