I'm nervous guys. Will Don Lemon humiliate us like Comey and Letitia and Hillary did??

The legal definition of an accomplice requires that you provide some assistance to carry out the crime.

That didn’t happen here.
Black's Law

Accomplice:

One who knowingly, voluntarily and with common intent unites with the principal offender in the commission of a crime. Smith v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 525 S.W.2d 674, 676; Model Penal Code, No. 2.06(3).

https://blacks_law.en-academic.com/301/accomplice
 
Lemon is journalist. He is covered the First Amendment. This is malicious prosecution.
None of the TV people are journalists. Some were. Now they are commentators. Doesn't Lemon do News year Eve TV shows where he is so drunk he is making homosexual love with others on the show? I remember some of the older commentators who were journalists. They never were.
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
I honestly don’t think the DoJ gives a shit about whether they can prove the case or not.

I think it’s just about making people feel afraid.
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
You morons are so adept at humiliating yourselves, you don’t need queer lemon for any assistance.
 
Black's Law

Accomplice:

One who knowingly, voluntarily and with common intent unites with the principal offender in the commission of a crime. Smith v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 525 S.W.2d 674, 676; Model Penal Code, No. 2.06(3).

https://blacks_law.en-academic.com/301/accomplice
If that's the legal standard, you’re going to have a very difficult time proving common intent.

The protesters were there to disrupt.

A journalist is there to record.
 
Lemon did nothing of the sort. He was covering a story. You are a piss poor liar.
That’s gonna be a problem cause lemon already said that not until AFTER they broke into the church did he decide to start recording it for his “show”
 
Black's Law

Accomplice:

One who knowingly, voluntarily and with common intent unites with the principal offender in the commission of a crime. Smith v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 525 S.W.2d 674, 676; Model Penal Code, No. 2.06(3).

https://blacks_law.en-academic.com/301/accomplice
but he didn't unite them in filming, because they weren't filming. he would have to join them in committing a crime whoever "them" are. and filming isn't criminal.
 
If that's the legal standard, you’re going to have a very difficult time proving common intent.

The protesters were there to disrupt.

A journalist is there to record.
That’s gonna be an issue as lemon already stated he didn’t state recording the attack until after he and the rioters got into the church.
 
If that's the legal standard, you’re going to have a very difficult time proving common intent.

The protesters were there to disrupt.

A journalist is there to record.
The salient point being can a person go along to a film a crime with foreknowledge of the crime?

No they can't without being an accomplice or perpetrator.
 
but he didn't unite them in filming, because they weren't filming. he would have to join them in committing a crime whoever "them" are. and filming isn't criminal.
Which is why this isn't going to stand.

And the Magistrate Judge's colleagues who appointed him/her are going to take a very close look at that warrant.
 
The salient point being can a person go along to a film a crime with foreknowledge of the crime?

No they can't without being an accomplice or perpetrator.
Your definition of accomplice says they have a common intent.

But that’s not the case for a journalist whose intent is to document.

Did you want to use a different definition?
 
I honestly don’t think the DoJ gives a shit about whether they can prove the case or not.

I think it’s just about making people feel afraid.

That often happens when people attempt to suggest feelings are the best representation of thinking in legal matters.
They tend to make the mistake of believing everyone else is subject to the way they feel, and the motives or intentions of others are based more in feelings than any legal sense.
 
15th post
Can a journalist go along to film a murder they know is forthcoming?
I don't know. That's not what we are talking about here. I could see there being different rules for something as extreme as murder.

But you're still dodging the point that your definition includes common intent, which isn't the case in this situation.

Do you want to respond to this?
 
Your definition of accomplice says they have a common intent.

But that’s not the case for a journalist whose intent is to document.

Did you want to use a different definition?
One he isn’t charged with being an accomplice

Two he already admitted on air that he didn’t form the intent to record anything until after he was in the church with the mob
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
You are a lying piece of shit. You're not nervous at all. You want him to humiliate the right. I don't understand why you just can't be honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom