I'm nervous guys. Will Don Lemon humiliate us like Comey and Letitia and Hillary did??

Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
You're going to be embarrassed again.
 
I don't know. That's not what we are talking about here. I could see there being different rules for something as extreme as murder.

But you're still dodging the point that your definition includes common intent, which isn't the case in this situation.

Do you want to respond to this?
If you don't know how can you argue it?

Is it matter of degree of the severity of the crime then?

Common intent: Have you seen any widely available condemnation of ICE by Lemon?

Is Lemon a detached neutral observer?
 
You are a lying piece of shit. You're not nervous at all. You want him to humiliate the right. I don't understand why you just can't be honest.
You right-wingers need to be humiliated. Look at the crazy stuff you guys are supporting.
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.

1769816116282.webp



He'll be very popular in prison. :laughing0301:
 
If you don't know how can you argue it?
I'm not arguing about murder.
Is it matter of degree of the severity of the crime then?
Potentially. Rules shift when you're talking about life and death.
Common intent: Have you seen any widely available condemnation of ICE by Lemon?
Yes. Condemning ICE is not the crime.
Is Lemon a detached neutral observer?
Not really, but having an opinion is not a crime. He behaved as a journalist, making it hard to claim his intent was to be a protestor/disrupter let alone prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
"Lemon appeared before the judge in a cream-colored double-breasted suit with a matching T-shirt, the same clothes he was wearing when he was arrested, CBS News learned. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass attended the hearing and was in the gallery.

Abbe Lowell, Lemon's lawyer, confirmed he was taken into custody by federal agents Thursday night in L.A., where he was covering this weekend's Grammy Awards."


:laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 
I'm not arguing about murder.

Potentially. Rules shift when you're talking about life and death.

Yes. Condemning ICE is not the crime.

Not really, but having an opinion is not a crime. He behaved as a journalist, making it hard to claim his intent was to be a protestor/disrupter let alone prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Crime is a crime.

You can not have foreknowledge of a crime and enjoin the primary perpetrators in the name of journalism without being an accomplice.

Condemning ICE is not the crime. It speaks to the common intent of Lemon and his fellow perpetrators.
 
They don’t need immunity if they’re not breaking the law. Documenting a protest doesn’t violate the law.
Buying coffee and doughnuts for the rioters is more than documenting.
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
That ship already sailed. What's really going to be funny, is Don Lemon covering the Trump, Bondi, Miller, Homan, Blanche, Noem, Patel, and Bovin trials in 2029 and beyond.

Can you imagine the embarrassment of Don poking a microphone in their faces every day on national television, outside of the courthouse?

It will be demoralizing indeed.
 
Crime is a crime.

You can not have foreknowledge of a crime and enjoin the primary perpetrators in the name of journalism without being an accomplice.

Condemning ICE is not the crime. It speaks to the common intent of Lemon and his fellow perpetrators.
But that depends on in intent.

The crime is disrupting the church service. Condemnation of ICE is the motive.

Condemnation of ICE does not demonstrate intent because it's not sufficient to show that Lemon had intended to disrupt the service.
 
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.
"we"? Who is "we"?


Are you referring to posters who pretend they are something they are not or something else?
 
15th post
Guys, I"m nervous. Liberals were relentless when we failed to lock up Hillary (email crime that we accused her of), James Comey and Letitia James.
Now we charged Don Lemon, who I'm hoping will be locked up. But what if we can't prove that he was there as anything other than a news gatherer?
Guys, we can't afford to go 0 for 4. Our DOJ will never be taking seriously anymore.
Reassure me please.

I'm nervous guys. Will Don Lemon humiliate us like Comey and Letitia and Hillary did??​


Yes, Don Lemon will humiliate the left at least as much as those other leftards did.
 
Not really, but having an opinion is not a crime. He behaved as a journalist, making it hard to claim his intent was to be a protestor/disrupter let alone prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Not picking on you in particular because many people are arguing a moot point, but if you investigate the charges Don Lemon was booked under, they are "Federal Civil Rights Crimes" and including violations of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act otherwise known as the "FACE Act".

In that regard they are not talking about conspiracy or prior knowledge of a crime.
Don Lemon violated the FACE Act when he entered a place of worship and did not leave when requested to (it's that simple).
Not even Journalists can go wherever they want and do whatever they feel like, even in the execution of journalism when private property (particularly a place of worship) is involved.

Everyone has rights, and his Freedom of the Press, and the protestors' Freedom of Speech, do not, and will never overrule the parishioners' rights to freely exercise their constitutionally protected right to Freedom of Religion.

Also, even in venues that are open to the public (and specifically in regard to places of worship), attendees enter what is considered to be an "unwritten contract" (unless it is considered to be a "written contract" by the law, if they purchase a ticket) agreeing to abide by the rules and requirements set by the Property Owner.

That in no way means that the church becomes a piece of Public Property, even if they are hosting an event open to the public.
 
Last edited:
But that depends on in intent.

The crime is disrupting the church service. Condemnation of ICE is the motive.

Condemnation of ICE does not demonstrate intent because it's not sufficient to show that Lemon had intended to disrupt the service.
Then why did he and the mob go into a church service?
 
Back
Top Bottom