Illegal's Right To Work

[danielpalos]

no, you just decided you don't have to follow Federal law.

sure; why not start with federal gun control laws?

This is the "immigration" forum. Did you get lost?

no. it is about the cognitive dissonance, exogenous to myself, that is the problem with those of your point of view. Why a problem with only some federal laws?

 

[Oldglory1]

no, you just decided you don't have to follow Federal law.

sure; why not start with federal gun control laws?

This is the "immigration" forum. Did you get lost?

no. it is about the cognitive dissonance, exogenous to myself, that is the problem with those of your point of view. Why a problem with only some federal laws?

I have a problem with all laws that aren't being enforced and those who violate them. Now shall we stick to the topic of this forum which is "immigration"?

 

[danielpalos]

no, you just decided you don't have to follow Federal law.

sure; why not start with federal gun control laws?

This is the "immigration" forum. Did you get lost?

no. it is about the cognitive dissonance, exogenous to myself, that is the problem with those of your point of view. Why a problem with only some federal laws?

I have a problem with all laws that aren't being enforced and those who violate them. Now shall we stick to the topic of this forum which is "immigration"?

Ok. Why do we even have an illegal "problem" with our Commerce Clause? Is capitalism really that useless to the right?

 

[Greeneyedlady]

It's illegals working without permission that is the problem.

 

[Oldglory1]

no, you just decided you don't have to follow Federal law.

sure; why not start with federal gun control laws?

This is the "immigration" forum. Did you get lost?

no. it is about the cognitive dissonance, exogenous to myself, that is the problem with those of your point of view. Why a problem with only some federal laws?

I have a problem with all laws that aren't being enforced and those who violate them. Now shall we stick to the topic of this forum which is "immigration"?

Ok. Why do we even have an illegal "problem" with our Commerce Clause? Is capitalism really that useless to the right?

Capitalism doesn't trump or negate our immigration laws nor should it.

 

[Greeneyedlady]

Neither does the commerce clause negate immigration law. For some reason, daniel thinks it does and is using it as an excuse for illegal lawbreakers. That would be a no go.

 

[Oldglory1]

Neither does the commerce clause negate immigration law. For some reason, daniel thinks it does and is using it as an excuse for illegal lawbreakers. That would be a no go.

He knows it. He is just making a desperate attempt to justify illegal immigration into our country and probably because he is Latino. They think their ethnic group should be above our immigration laws and rewarded for breaking them.

 

[danielpalos]

It's illegals working without permission that is the problem.

There are no illegals working and getting paid, without permission of capitalists who employ capital and any labor required secure any potential, multimillion dollar bonuses. Only the right has a problem with Capitalism and declaims it in favor of the socialism of the coercive use of force of the collective of our State.

 

[danielpalos]

sure; why not start with federal gun control laws?

This is the "immigration" forum. Did you get lost?

no. it is about the cognitive dissonance, exogenous to myself, that is the problem with those of your point of view. Why a problem with only some federal laws?

I have a problem with all laws that aren't being enforced and those who violate them. Now shall we stick to the topic of this forum which is "immigration"?

Ok. Why do we even have an illegal "problem" with our Commerce Clause? Is capitalism really that useless to the right?

Capitalism doesn't trump or negate our immigration laws nor should it.

It shouldn't; but, if our laws are inferior, maybe we need better laws that actually make money, since we even have recourse to an official Mint to do it with our Commerce Clause.

 

[danielpalos]

Neither does the commerce clause negate immigration law. For some reason, daniel thinks it does and is using it as an excuse for illegal lawbreakers. That would be a no go.

The point is capitalism is supposed to make money, not more government programs, blah...blah...blah, while lowering taxes; only the right still believes that form of "cult of capitalism".

 

[Greeneyedlady]

Only the right believes in enforcing the laws. Illegal immigration costs us billions each year. If we enforced the laws as they stand now, we would save billions. That's good capitalism.

 

[Greeneyedlady]

You can whine about Capitalism, the commerce clause, money or whatever. It's not going to change the law. Illegals cannot work in the US without government papers. That's the facts, jack.

 

[danielpalos]

Only the right believes in enforcing the laws. Illegal immigration costs us billions each year. If we enforced the laws as they stand now, we would save billions. That's good capitalism.

dudette, only the right is that cognitively dissonant or they would not have a problem with federal gun control laws.

We have a Commerce Clause; why do we have an illegal problem at our borders and not making more money even with an official Mint at our disposal?

 

[danielpalos]

You can whine about Capitalism, the commerce clause, money or whatever. It's not going to change the law. Illegals cannot work in the US without government papers. That's the facts, jack.

It doesn't matter if someone is willing to practice Individual Liberty and hire them. It is only a federal law that must be only enforced by the federal government.

 

[Greeneyedlady]

Yes, and now that the choomin bamboo's eo has been named for what it was, and stopped, we can start getting back to the business of enforcing the law. Deport illegal workers.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, and now that the choomin bamboo's eo has been named for what it was, and stopped, we can start getting back to the business of enforcing the law. Deport illegal workers.

The point is dear, unnecessary and improper laws regarding immigration can be changed, our Commerce Clause cannot. Why are we losing money on Commerce at our borders?

 

[fmdog44]

Here in Houston, Texas illegals are driving cars and trucks with no license and of course not insurance. Now here is the fact if you get in to a wreck with one. You are told by the police officer "there is nothing that can be done" in terms of them paying for your damage and it is true. It is so common here it should be written in to our laws. This is not an exaggeration in any form. It is simply the way it is. We have a lot of hit and runs here and a large part of them are most likely by illegals and drunks. It is sad with new cars being so expensive then you get hit by an illegal and you foot the bill for 100% and they pay nothing. The officer in many cases will not even make an arrest.

 

[Oldglory1]

Yes, and now that the choomin bamboo's eo has been named for what it was, and stopped, we can start getting back to the business of enforcing the law. Deport illegal workers.

The point is dear, unnecessary and improper laws regarding immigration can be changed, our Commerce Clause cannot. Why are we losing money on Commerce at our borders?

WTH are you, a parrot? Knock off your BS about a Commerce Clause as it does not nor should it negate our immigration laws. Illegals aren't staying at the border. They are in the interior of our country. Our immigration laws are unnecessary and improper? Is that the same for all the countries in the world or just us? Why aren't you bitching about Mexico's immigration laws? You never answered my question if you are Hispanic or not. I surmise that you are and you're just another ethnocentric racist with a tribal mentality for your ethnic group. I'm thru listening to your anti-American tripe! Welcome to my ignore list.

 

[danielpalos]

Here in Houston, Texas illegals are driving cars and trucks with no license and of course not insurance. Now here is the fact if you get in to a wreck with one. You are told by the police officer "there is nothing that can be done" in terms of them paying for your damage and it is true. It is so common here it should be written in to our laws. This is not an exaggeration in any form. It is simply the way it is. We have a lot of hit and runs here and a large part of them are most likely by illegals and drunks. It is sad with new cars being so expensive then you get hit by an illegal and you foot the bill for 100% and they pay nothing. The officer in many cases will not even make an arrest.

We solved that problem in California through Individual Liberty and Individual fiscal responsibility to obtain more perfect knowledge of the rules of the road, and the concept of caveat emptor in our markets (for insurance).

 

[Abishai100]

Dollars & Diapers


A very laissez-faire attitude towards governance-free capitalism opens complicated doors to cheap labor and minimum wage issues.

I'm thinking of a consumer electronics store in New Orleans, Louisiana owned by a family immigrated from Saudi Arabia and decorated with various Middle Eastern themed ornaments, and I wonder if such a store accentuates the positive confluences created by a free market or if it creates the impression of pure profiteerism/opportunism.

That's why Richie Rich is perhaps my favorite American comic book character.







Richie Rich 1980 TV series - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia