Illegal war or not doing enough?!

How so?

Bush never would say "Islamic terrorism" . Cause it's bad form for a world leader who wants the help of Islamic countries to fight the Islamic terrorists .
 
You right wing meatheads really don't learn from history do you .

I guess your official vote is : no it's not an illegal war, and yes we should send in troops .

What's the long term plan by the way ?
 
Barry is smart enough to keep us out of another quagmire .
How about GETTING us out of this one first

How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
 
Barry is smart enough to keep us out of another quagmire .
How about GETTING us out of this one first

How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:
 
Barry is smart enough to keep us out of another quagmire .
How about GETTING us out of this one first

How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:

I dont want more dead .

Obama promised to get us out of Iraq and he has . Sorry they couldn't handle shit and they went back into in fighting .

10+ years and trillions later is enough .
 
It's time Iran, Putin, UAE, Saudi, Qatar, Turkey, and those other nations to take the lead.

Not going to happen.

So now what?
Putin and Iran already took 'the lead' in Syria by moving in to Syria to ensure Assad was protected. Russia...and now France as well, has already taken a big lead by ignoring Obama's BS ROE that protected ISIS and by beginning to bomb all ISIS targets, for which Obama is claiming credit by saying 'his' coalition is doing that. This bombing is happening IN SPITE of / despite Obama.
 
How about GETTING us out of this one first

How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:

I dont want more dead .

Obama promised to get us out of Iraq and he has . Sorry they couldn't handle shit and they went back into in fighting .

10+ years and trillions later is enough .
Why are we still in Afghanistan then. We've been there longer than Iraq
 
How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:

I dont want more dead .

Obama promised to get us out of Iraq and he has . Sorry they couldn't handle shit and they went back into in fighting .

10+ years and trillions later is enough .
Why are we still in Afghanistan then. We've been there longer than Iraq

At least afghan made sense . That's were alqueda was hiding . Although the country building plan was a real **** up .

They can't handle us being gone . Iraq is more sophisticated . Maliki blew it after we left . Or whatever his name is .
 
Last edited:
How about GETTING us out of this one first

How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:

I dont want more dead .

Obama promised to get us out of Iraq and he has . Sorry they couldn't handle shit and they went back into in fighting .

10+ years and trillions later is enough .
NEWS FLASH, Jr....we are STILL in Iraq. Obama has gotten ys bagged down there more by climbing into bed with ISIS and with his obsession with Assad.

Obama just sent over 200 SpecOps guys there, escalating our presence there.
 
There's a paradox I hear all the time from righties . There's all kinds of threads about Obamas lack of response to ISIS , that air supports is not enough (aka send in the troops )

At the same time the righties will complain about Obamas "illegal war".

Well which is it ? If it's an illegal war , how can you complian he's not doing enough . Right wingers should be demanding he stop bombing ISIS immediately !
It is an illegal war and the left should be demanding Obama stop bombing ISIS immediately. So what gives?
 
How many American troops killed in Iraq this year?
You don't want to go there

Why not ? That's what we are talking about right ?

Conservatives don't want to say it, but they want to send in troops . Troops who will have to extract those suicidal psychos .

And then what ? Another decade of roadside bombs ?
Do you want to compare Bush's Afghanistan casualties to Obama's? Or do you want to sit down, shut up and not politicize the dead? :eusa_hand:

I dont want more dead .

Obama promised to get us out of Iraq and he has . Sorry they couldn't handle shit and they went back into in fighting .

10+ years and trillions later is enough .
NEWS FLASH, Jr....we are STILL in Iraq. Obama has gotten ys bagged down there more by climbing into bed with ISIS and with his obsession with Assad.

Obama just sent over 200 SpecOps guys there, escalating our presence there.

Climbing into bed wh ISIS ! ? Wow you freaks are delusional .
 
He supplied them, armed them, protected them, and even trained some of their troops, Timmy.... helluva way to 'fight' them. Then again, ge has been trying to 'Contain' them, not DEFEAT them....
 
From that aumf-
c) LIMITATIONS.— The authority granted in subsection (a) does not authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces in enduring offensive ground combat operations.

It also limits the fight to 3 years. If not defeated, then what, start all over? When does announcing a time limit to the enemy work? All they have to do is wait us out. There were many Dems that also did not like his aumf.

Some argue that bushs declaration makes the war against IS legal.

That's Obama's argument.

Obama has asked the GOP to approve an AUMF against ISIS for over a year now. They have hidden their heads in the sand instead.


I also believe that is why obamas got turned down on his own. Because the last one was so shitty and too general.

Obama's AUMF against ISIS that he has been asking for is much longer than the one given to Bush.
 
There's a paradox I hear all the time from righties . There's all kinds of threads about Obamas lack of response to ISIS , that air supports is not enough (aka send in the troops )

At the same time the righties will complain about Obamas "illegal war".

Well which is it ? If it's an illegal war , how can you complian he's not doing enough . Right wingers should be demanding he stop bombing ISIS immediately !

upload_2015-12-14_23-57-0.webp


I'm glad that you're now admitting that they are wars that are being conducted illegally and unconstitutionally by the Democratic Nobel War Criminal In Chief.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Bottom line, Congress needs to step up and vote on something. Take responsibility.
Obama is the Commander in Chief. He is the one who needs to present a plan to COngress and get approval. Right?

He has. He even, helpfully, drafted a plan and sent it to Congress.

The War Against ISIS Will Go Undeclared
He sent a plan to make sure he would lose the war and blame Republicans. It's something typically cynical for him, counting on stupid people to believe it.
And here you are.

Oh please, that's pathetic even for you. Congress needs to act. They can't keep pussying out. Those cheese eating surrender monkeys in France did it. Great Britain did it. Not our ***** GOP led Congress though.

They keep saying that President Obama isn't showing leadership. Where's theirs?
 
15th post
There's a paradox I hear all the time from righties . There's all kinds of threads about Obamas lack of response to ISIS , that air supports is not enough (aka send in the troops )

At the same time the righties will complain about Obamas "illegal war".

Well which is it ? If it's an illegal war , how can you complian he's not doing enough . Right wingers should be demanding he stop bombing ISIS immediately !
It's the same partisan idiocy we hear all the time from most on the ridiculous right – that whatever Obama does, he's 'always wrong.'

In this case the president is correct and conservatives are wrong (again): sending a conventional military ground force to the Region would be a mistake, it's exactly what ISIS wants the US to do, and we'd be trapped in another quagmire with Americans again pointlessly dying in a failed, endless war.
 
There's a paradox I hear all the time from righties . There's all kinds of threads about Obamas lack of response to ISIS , that air supports is not enough (aka send in the troops )

At the same time the righties will complain about Obamas "illegal war".

Well which is it ? If it's an illegal war , how can you complian he's not doing enough . Right wingers should be demanding he stop bombing ISIS immediately !
It's the same partisan idiocy we hear all the time from most on the ridiculous right – that whatever Obama does, he's 'always wrong.'

In this case the president is correct and conservatives are wrong (again): sending a conventional military ground force to the Region would be a mistake, it's exactly what ISIS wants the US to do, and we'd be trapped in another quagmire with Americans again pointlessly dying in a failed, endless war.
Bullshit. We ARE trapped in yet another quagmire with the only real difference that we have no plans on how to get out of it this time around.
 
The problem with the current strategy is that it is ineffective and does not accomplish anything. I would prefer that we never sent in there in the first place and even more that we would STOP removing functioning governments in the name of installing new ones. Virtually every time that 'new' government ends up being filled with extremist terrorists rather than friendly democracies. The whole idea of regime change from the US has been proven to be an idiotic idea.

That is irrelevant though as we went there anyway and have destabilized the area. There is no damn choice anymore but to finish it. The constant bombing is not going to accomplish anything other than killing more people and creating more terrorists. We either need to shit or get off the pot. Go in there with a plan to finish this or get the hell out of there and count our losses. I have no idea where this idea that you can execute a war through nothing other than air power came from but it is asinine. You need ground forces with it or the air power cannot make real gains.

What is truly pathetic is that Obama is making the same mistakes that Bush did. Why did we not learn from our past mistakes?
 
Back
Top Bottom