- Banned
- #121
I'm pretty open on the subject to. That is why I would let employers hire whomever they wanted.
Give employers significant tax breaks for hiring all American and see which works out better for America: low paid foreigners and low taxes or higher paid Americans and less taxes.
Sorry, I just don't fully understand what you're saying here to be honest. Can you explain a bit further?
Coming into the United States without papers is the federal equivalent of making an improper U Turn. Most in the anti-immigrant lobby want to impose a felony consequence - some even advocate murdering them.
What they fail to understand is that for every person who advocates all these draconian measures like mass deportation, etc. there is another person that invites the foreigner in by providing them a job, renting to them, buying from them, etc.
Most of the time the people bitching about immigration knowingly do business with those that hire, rent to, buy from or otherwise do business with undocumented foreigners. If we enforced the laws the way they want them to enforce them, half of America would be in prison; millions of homes would become the property of the government; millions of companies would go under and / or leave the U.S. Sooo.
I think that an employer should be able to hire whomever in the Hell they want to hire. The employer created the job and one of the great hallmarks of our constitutional Republic is the Right to own private property.
The anti-immigrants scream, "they're stealing our jobs" but the ONLY way someone can "steal" a job is if it belonged to someone else in the first place. Make no mistake: it is only in a socialist society where the government / the people own the jobs. Most anti-immigrants are rabid socialists.
So, with that in mind, the way to resolve the issue and make it both fair and equitable is to let the employer hire whomever they want AND we do not force guest workers to become citizens. We limit the benefits and privileges of citizenship to citizens, so guest workers do not qualify for welfare, Socialist Security, etc.
Then we create tax breaks for the employer who hires an all American staff. Create more tax breaks for those employers that take people off welfare, unemployment, and disability. Create an additional tax break for employers whose starting wage is at least 15 percent above the poverty level wage.
It puts everybody on a level playing field and solves the problem.
Yeah, I'm with you for the most part. I believe the first step for us to take is the construction of the border wall in the most relevant places. I agree with you that businesses should be able to hire whomever they want, but if a cop pulls over an illegal immigrant without a driver's license, I don't believe it is right for that specific illegal immigrant/their household to stay in this country. That's coming from a person who respects the hell out of the suffering they go through for their families. I can't even imagine, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the law America needs to abide to. Bouncing off what you said, it will hurt companies for a time, but it will create a better foundation for Americans as a whole.
And I'm no expert. I'm looking into this quite a bit, but it appears you're more informed, especially on the economics, than I am. Anyways, cheerio!
Well, when one considers the Constitution Free Zone and the impacts a POLICE STATE would have on civil liberties, I totally disavow any nutty wall idea. Benjamin Franklin once said something against trading essential Liberty for the promise of temporary Safety.
Once you give up one, you end up with neither.
I totally disavow any nutty wall idea.
Because it creates a police state and destroys the Constitution? LOL!
Something here is nutty.......and it's not a wall.
You look like your avatar. That is plenty nutty enough.
Erecting the ultimate POLICE STATE via the Constitutional Free Zone and deluding yourself into believing the buck stops there is a belief you can only sell to fools. When it comes to the immigration part, the United States Supreme Court will not separate families over a statute that is the federal equivalent of an improper U Turn.
When it's all said and done, come back and see me. BTW, Trump just agreed to the proposal I made here over a year ago when the anti-immigrants were fighting against Sanctuary Cities. I'm sure he'll claim it as his own and those of your ilk will never give credit where credit is due, but you heard it here first.