Illegal Dares Trump To Deport Him While Holding A Child He Claims Is His Kid Born In America...Demanding $20K To Leave

This idiot is going to be one of the first illegals to leave.

He may even self-deport before Trump takes office.

Demanding $20,000 to leave the US isn't a smart move when it comes to Trump.


Buena suerte con ese gilipollas
 
Until we start seeing those families that were deported on news feeds living on the streets and struggling, the sentiment here in the states will.change. No president wants to have that as their legacy, which is why I think deportation will be minimal.

The border needs to be sealed to prevent further influx of illegals though.
If families were deported why are they living on the streets? Deported means sent back to where they came from.
 
Well, that is an AI-produced crock of shit. SCOTUS decided that issue in 1898. Look it up. You cannot deport children born in the US to parents who are not citizens.
You cannot deport the children but parents that are deported certainly can take their children with them. Many, if not all of these countries give the children of these nationals citizenship. Mexico absolutely does. The American born children of Mexican nationals get the birth recorded at a Consular office. A Mexican birth certificate is issued just as it would be in Mexico. Children are citizens of the parent's home country.
 
You cannot deport the children but parents that are deported certainly can take their children with them. Many, if not all of these countries give the children of these nationals citizenship. Mexico absolutely does. The American born children of Mexican nationals get the birth recorded at a Consular office. A Mexican birth certificate is issued just as it would be in Mexico. Children are citizens of the parent's home country.
I was addressing the children not being deported and they can't. You are correct that they can go with them back to the parent's home country with little difficulty. Just like Ted Cruz is an American born in Canada. John McCain was an American born in Panama.
 
Nope, it would only require a reinterpretation of the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Easy peazy.

.
Already determined. There would be an immediate backlash to reinterpret such a very simple phrase. Those "not subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are here for diplomatic purposes and have immunity. There's about 125 years of case law that would be thrown on its ear. You really should read up on the topic.
 
I was addressing the children not being deported and they can't. You are correct that they can go with them back to the parent's home country with little difficulty. Just like Ted Cruz is an American born in Canada. John McCain was an American born in Panama.
Then it is the parents choosing to separate their family if they abandon their child here.
 
The law says he had to go back. It was the one time I actually supported Clinton against all of his nay-sayers.
The law says if your parent or legal guardian asks for asylum then they have to consider it.

But the Clinton Adm was doing favors for their commie friends in Cuba.....so Elian had to go back.
 
Already determined. There would be an immediate backlash to reinterpret such a very simple phrase. Those "not subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are here for diplomatic purposes and have immunity. There's about 125 years of case law that would be thrown on its ear. You really should read up on the topic.


I probably know more about it than most attorneys, the authors of the 14th had no intention on entering into a suicide pact and no one can convince me that they wanted to give illegal aliens spawn more rights than American Indians had at the time.

.
 
We'll get over any 'outrage', the people voted for deportations. Best get used to the idea they will ignore the whining and wailing until they are satisfied.
We shall see what happens
 
15th post
Tom Homan already said they can take their kids with them. That will likely be the policy. Homan doesn't play as he worked for Obama too!

Sure, and it's one thing to not be in a position of power and say something, and another to be in a position to effect change.

If trump starts deporting babies, that are US citizens, the republican party will take a hit that they likely won't recover from for a very long time.
 
Last edited:
I am so sorry that you are falling for liberal hype. You have to remember. Trump's popularity means zilch. He's never going to run again!

I'm not falling for any hype. I'm just being a realist. Trump my not run again but there will be another republicans who want to run, and the left will spare no expense to make sure that candidate is linked to trump policies.

I'm with you guys on illegal immigration, it needs to stop, but I'm telling you, the American government is not going to deport babies, who are American citizens, and they are not going to force them into adoption by deporting their parents.

This is not acquiescing to the left, this is just my view of what I think is going to happen, based on what I feel the American public is willing to accept
 
If families were deported why are they living on the streets? Deported means sent back to where they came from.

My point was, if an illegal family is doing well here in America, and then they are deported and then end up in the streets, that will be a problem in optics for republicans
 
Well, that is an AI-produced crock of shit. SCOTUS decided that issue in 1898. Look it up. You cannot deport children born in the US to parents who are not citizens.
That's the very case I was referencing. That supreme court ruled that diplomates who have a child born on US soil does not give citizenship to that child. And being subject to US laws according to the 14th amendment.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom