Arlette
Diamond Member
- Jul 6, 2023
- 15,623
- 10,561
- 2,138
You need better sources of infoI know of people who were arrested for TicToc videos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need better sources of infoI know of people who were arrested for TicToc videos.
I agree that they should be punished, but america, in general, is a humane country who will not stand for mass deportation of families, especially with children who have never known any other life but an American one.
I'm just trying to set the expectation for the near future is all.
I'd take it a step further. If they don't self-deport, they lose the right to come back in.Oh you can still deport the illegals, it is just that they must get back in line and apply for citizenship like everyone else does. If they dont want to be separated from their Anchors, then they can take those Anchors with them.
I know of people who were arrested for TicToc videos.
Immigrant parents who did it the right way
But…but…but…that would be responsibility AND repercussionsIllegals put their families in that position, it's on them to deal with it.
.
This idiot is going to be one of the first illegals to leave.
He may even self-deport before Trump takes office.
Demanding $20,000 to leave the US isn't a smart move when it comes to Trump.
Born her with hospital records or birth certificate and stay hereAI Overview
View attachment 1041735
View attachment 1041736
This statement is true; children born on U.S. soil to foreign diplomats are generally not considered U.S. citizens because they are not considered "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States due to their parents' diplomatic immunity, as outlined in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Illegals aren't subject to jurisdictions in the U.S.
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
I agree with you, I'm just telling you what I think will most likely happen.It’s the dad that must be sent back to Mexico. You don’t get a free Green Card for knocking a woman up after sneaking to el Norte.
Enough of them can be sent back to send the message that law breakers don’t get rewarded.
The “dem outrage” is just a pleasant side effect.
I think you are emotionally unrealistic as most Americans do not ascribe to a “poor baby illegal…let’s take care of him (and scores of more)”
Illegals put their families in that position, it's on them to deal with it.
.
We'll get over any 'outrage', the people voted for deportations. Best get used to the idea they will ignore the whining and wailing until they are satisfied.True, but still, it's a baby, and if you sent that baby back to mexico, you never see the end of the legal challenges and dem outrage.
We have to face the fact that, most of these illegals that are here, are not going anywhere. The imperative thing is to seal the border to prevent further influx of "future voters"
The law says he had to go back. It was the one time I actually supported Clinton against all of his nay-sayers.Yeah.....and Jan 6th was the worst human disaster in modern history too.
The commies were holding a gun to his father's head, and you actually think his father wanted him back picking tomatoes in the fields.
Tom Homan already said they can take their kids with them. That will likely be the policy. Homan doesn't play as he worked for Obama too!See, I think most Americans do. I'm of the mindset that most of America is really down the middle when it comes to politics and social issues. Sure, they may have their side when it comes to voting, but it's the minority who really follow politics. I think most Americans watch an hour of fox News or CNN a night, if that, and then turn over to dancing with the stars.
If trump starts deporting infants and families who have been here for 10-15 years, CNN will put their faces on TV and watch how fast trump starts dropping in the polls.
But hey, it's just my opinion. I reserve the right to be wrong, but I don't think I am.
I am so sorry that you are falling for liberal hype. You have to remember. Trump's popularity means zilch. He's never going to run again!Hate to say it , but that's not how it works. America won't stand for it, and no president wants to be the one that sends a baby who is a US citizen to live in a struggling country like Mexico or Honduras.
It would spark outrage across the country. No president wants to be the one to separate a baby from its family either.
The guy in the video won't be deported, because of the baby, and that's the point. The dems are counting on this situation. They know that nobody wants to deport families, so they resist securing the border, and facilitate their entry, and hope they start a family over here so they can't be deported, and as soon as they can fast track that citizenship, they'll have 30 million new voters instantly.
There are no legal challenges. The deportation is the legal process. Once their gone, who cares?True, but still, it's a baby, and if you sent that baby back to mexico, you never see the end of the legal challenges and dem outrage.
We have to face the fact that, most of these illegals that are here, are not going anywhere. The imperative thing is to seal the border to prevent further influx of "future voters"
If the judges refuse to stay the deportation, then what will they do? There is a new sheriff in town and illegals better be making plans to go back or to jail.I understand your frustration but I'm just trying to be realistic. Nobody is going to deport an infant. Every human rights organization in America would be filing lawsuits, getting stays on the deportation.
I could be wrong, but the most likely scenario is that they will increase efforts to deport criminals, and maybe some of the illegals that have been here for a very short time, but those who have been here for many years and those who have families, are likely here.to stay.
Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just trying to be realistic.
Well, that is an AI-produced crock of shit. SCOTUS decided that issue in 1898. Look it up. You cannot deport children born in the US to parents who are not citizens.AI Overview
View attachment 1041735
View attachment 1041736
This statement is true; children born on U.S. soil to foreign diplomats are generally not considered U.S. citizens because they are not considered "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States due to their parents' diplomatic immunity, as outlined in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Illegals aren't subject to jurisdictions in the U.S.
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
Ask ObamaYes. His father had legal custody and wanted his son back. What happened to keeping families together?
Until we start seeing those families that were deported on news feeds living on the streets and struggling, the sentiment here in the states will.change. No president wants to have that as their legacy, which is why I think deportation will be minimal.
The border needs to be sealed to prevent further influx of illegals though.