If your sex life is none of my business, stop demanding that I finance it

[francoHFW]

Yup, it's not this GOP system, it's just people changed...

After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVER, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?

 

[francoHFW]

RWers don't have sex?

Like everything else - we take personal responsibility for it. We pay for our own contraception and our own children. It's a radical concept. You should try it sometime.

So all those rural single mothers are imaginary? What a joke...

 

[ChrisL]

So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?

I don't care if it does. I'm fine with that. But don't mandate what a policy must have, don't mandate that the Church has to provide that stuff, and most of all - don't dare make it "free" from government. Because it's not "free". I pay for it. And it's not my job to pay for progressives to have sex and spread more STD's to each other.

Lol! Those dirty hippies!

 

[francoHFW]

You'd pay a lot more for welfare.

Which just proves yet again that socialism is a failed ideology. Thank you!

Just reality.

 

[P@triot]

No they do not. No one is asking you to buy a rainbow flag nor put them on some pedestal. This has nothing to do with special priveleges. Progressives just ask you to respect their choice in lifestyle. Hell you can dislike them if you want, just don't rub your bigotry in their faces.

Why not? I don't lose my 1st Amendment rights simply because someone is LGBT. I don't care if they can't handle "bigotry in their faces". That just shows they aren't mature enough to even be making those kinds of decisions.

No one is telling you to like them. I know you cons struggle with empathy but let's put it this way: do you expect people to stay out of your business when it comes to your love for guns? How about your 1st amendment right to say whatever jackass things you want?

Seriously dude, put up a sign in your front yard saying you hate gays if you want. Just stay out of THEIR business.

I'm happy to stay out of their business. If only they and the left would stop insisting that I get into their business. A prime example: New York City passed a law making it a crime if you don't refer to a person by their preferred pronoun. So the government is not forcing me to tell a lie. If chromosomes prove you are a man, I'm forced to ignore science and refer to you as a woman.

That's one of zillions of examples of the left insisting that embrace their lifestyle. And it tramples on my 1st Amendment rights.

 

[Billy000]

No they do not. No one is asking you to buy a rainbow flag nor put them on some pedestal. This has nothing to do with special priveleges. Progressives just ask you to respect their choice in lifestyle. Hell you can dislike them if you want, just don't rub your bigotry in their faces.

Why not? I don't lose my 1st Amendment rights simply because someone is LGBT. I don't care if they can't handle "bigotry in their faces". That just shows they aren't mature enough to even be making those kinds of decisions.

No one is telling you to like them. I know you cons struggle with empathy but let's put it this way: do you expect people to stay out of your business when it comes to your love for guns? How about your 1st amendment right to say whatever jackass things you want?

Seriously dude, put up a sign in your front yard saying you hate gays if you want. Just stay out of THEIR business.

I'm happy to stay out of their business. If only they and the left would stop insisting that I get into their business. A prime example: New York City passed a law making it a crime if you don't refer to a person by their preferred pronoun. So the government is not forcing me to tell a lie. If chromosomes prove you are a man, I'm forced to ignore science and refer to you as a woman.

That's one of zillions of examples of the left insisting that embrace their lifestyle. And it tramples on my 1st Amendment rights.

I need a citation for that. I think you're full of shit.

 

[P@triot]

No they do not. No one is asking you to buy a rainbow flag nor put them on some pedestal. This has nothing to do with special priveleges. Progressives just ask you to respect their choice in lifestyle. Hell you can dislike them if you want, just don't rub your bigotry in their faces.

Why not? I don't lose my 1st Amendment rights simply because someone is LGBT. I don't care if they can't handle "bigotry in their faces". That just shows they aren't mature enough to even be making those kinds of decisions.

No one is telling you to like them. I know you cons struggle with empathy but let's put it this way: do you expect people to stay out of your business when it comes to your love for guns? How about your 1st amendment right to say whatever jackass things you want?

Seriously dude, put up a sign in your front yard saying you hate gays if you want. Just stay out of THEIR business.

I'm happy to stay out of their business. If only they and the left would stop insisting that I get into their business. A prime example: New York City passed a law making it a crime if you don't refer to a person by their preferred pronoun. So the government is not forcing me to tell a lie. If chromosomes prove you are a man, I'm forced to ignore science and refer to you as a woman.

That's one of zillions of examples of the left insisting that embrace their lifestyle. And it tramples on my 1st Amendment rights.

I need a citation for that. I think you're full of shit.

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

 

[Billy000]

No they do not. No one is asking you to buy a rainbow flag nor put them on some pedestal. This has nothing to do with special priveleges. Progressives just ask you to respect their choice in lifestyle. Hell you can dislike them if you want, just don't rub your bigotry in their faces.

Why not? I don't lose my 1st Amendment rights simply because someone is LGBT. I don't care if they can't handle "bigotry in their faces". That just shows they aren't mature enough to even be making those kinds of decisions.

No one is telling you to like them. I know you cons struggle with empathy but let's put it this way: do you expect people to stay out of your business when it comes to your love for guns? How about your 1st amendment right to say whatever jackass things you want?

Seriously dude, put up a sign in your front yard saying you hate gays if you want. Just stay out of THEIR business.

I'm happy to stay out of their business. If only they and the left would stop insisting that I get into their business. A prime example: New York City passed a law making it a crime if you don't refer to a person by their preferred pronoun. So the government is not forcing me to tell a lie. If chromosomes prove you are a man, I'm forced to ignore science and refer to you as a woman.

That's one of zillions of examples of the left insisting that embrace their lifestyle. And it tramples on my 1st Amendment rights.

I need a citation for that. I think you're full of shit.

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

Lol this is so clearly fake news bullshit. The first line of your first article even says "legal guidelines". This bullshit is not an actual law. You'd know that if you didn't read RW bullshit like New York Post.

 

[P@triot]

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

Lol this is so clearly fake news bullshit. The first line of your first article even says "legal guidelines". This bullshit is not an actual law. You'd know that if you didn't read RW bullshit like New York Post.

LMAO! First progressives were science deniers. Then they became biology deniers. Then they became reality deniers. And now we can add legal deniers and news deniers.

Snowflake - the first link is the Washington Post. You can also do a Google search and see how embarrassingly wrong you are (as always).

 

[P@triot]

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

Lol this is so clearly fake news bullshit. The first line of your first article even says "legal guidelines". This bullshit is not an actual law. You'd know that if you didn't read RW bullshit like New York Post.

How about the official New York City government website, you immature tool? How embarrassing for you...

NYC Commission on Human Rights Announces Strong Protections for City's Transgender

 

[Billy000]

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

Lol this is so clearly fake news bullshit. The first line of your first article even says "legal guidelines". This bullshit is not an actual law. You'd know that if you didn't read RW bullshit like New York Post.

How about the official New York City government website, you immature tool? How embarrassing for you...

NYC Commission on Human Rights Announces Strong Protections for City's Transgender

Lol your dumbass believes anything fake rwing news says. This refers to business owners or landlords who repeatedly ignore requests to use certain pronouns. It doesn't fucking apply to the citizens in general in New York.

 

[xband]

Matt Walsh with yet another progressive beat down...

Matt Walsh: If your lifestyle is none of my business, stop demanding that I celebrate it

In the least that is an oxymoron or a contradiction in terms. Matt Walsh ain't too smart.

 

[P@triot]

You progressives are always out of the loop. How is that possible since you are the one's driving this shit?

You can be fined for not calling people ‘ze’ or ‘hir,’ if that’s the pronoun they demand that you use

Not using transgender pronouns could get you fined | New York Post

Lol this is so clearly fake news bullshit. The first line of your first article even says "legal guidelines". This bullshit is not an actual law. You'd know that if you didn't read RW bullshit like New York Post.

How about the official New York City government website, you immature tool? How embarrassing for you...

NYC Commission on Human Rights Announces Strong Protections for City's Transgender

Lol your dumbass believes anything fake rwing news says. This refers to business owners or landlords who repeatedly ignore requests to use certain pronouns. It doesn't fucking apply to the citizens in general in New York.

LMAO!!! First you deny it exists...then your dumbass comes back and attempts to minimize it once you can no longer deny it. And all of that, of course, after you didn't even know about it. Ignorance really is bliss - uh Billy?

Tell me - where does the government derive the power to force a landlord or business owner to lie? Someone born a man is in fact a man. Where does the government derive the power to force people to refer to them as a woman?

Furthermore, how the fuck is a business owner or landlord supposed to memorize the "preferred pronoun" of all of their customers and/or tenants?!?

 

[P@triot]

Matt Walsh with yet another progressive beat down...

Matt Walsh: If your lifestyle is none of my business, stop demanding that I celebrate it

In the least that is an oxymoron or a contradiction in terms. Matt Walsh ain't too smart.

What does that say about the liberals/progressives/etc. that he obliterates with logic and reason?

 

[sealybobo]

Matt Walsh with yet another progressive beat down...

Matt Walsh: If your lifestyle is none of my business, stop demanding that I celebrate it

Like Xmas?

 

[Conservative65]

Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.

Having those that produce them support them would solve everything.

Now that is radical. You really think outside of the box 65!

Not for you and I but for the left that thinks those that didn't have them are more responsible for them than those who did.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Public health is in everyone's best interest.

Government run healthcare is in no one's best interests.

Except of course for those who now have the coverage the previous system didn't allow.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?

Debunked far left religious narrative being run..

Yes I am sure the far left sees Pregnancy as a disease that must be eradicated.

Well insurance sees it as a hefty cost. That's why we like to cover contraceptives . As y'all have stated "we pay for it ".

Better to pay for an IUD than the cost of paying for all these babies and their care . Contraception saves costs .

Far left religious narrative being run!

Yes so the far left does believe that pregnancy is a disease that must be eradicated!

Unwanted pregnancy should be eradicated .

Why you freaking over contraception? Mad because you want to control women? Keep them barefoot and pregnant?

Unwanted pregnancy is easy to eradicate. If a woman has a child she can't afford to raise, it should be taken away from her and given to someone who has the wherewithal to raise it.

Brilliant!

Who feeds, clothes and houses it in the meantime?

What you aren't understanding is that you pay no matter what you do. The best, most economical and efficient remedy is to prevent the pregnancy in the first place.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.

Having those that produce them support them would solve everything.

That would be ideal. Unfortunately, the world rarely works that way.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Public health is in everyone's best interest.

There is no such thing as "public health". Only individuals have health. If you have cancer, that doesn't mean I have cancer. It's an individual issue.

If there were a such thing as "Public Health" then Bill Clinton and the Dumbocrats wouldn't have created HIPAA to protect the privacy of the individual. After all, privacy is the polar opposite of public.

Any other false narratives you'd like to try today?

There is no such thing as "public health".

That's where I stopped reading.


pub·lic health
noun

1. the health of the population as a whole, especially as monitored, regulated, and promoted by the state.
   "chlorine has been used to disinfect water supplies to protect public health"

No you didn't. You read the entire thing and it proved you wrong (as always). Only an individual can have health idiot.

By your idiotic "logic" - your health records are a matter of public record. Right?

They can't be two different things?

Why do municipalities remove trash, collect and treat sewage and provide purified water for consumption?

By your idiotic "logic" - your health records are a matter of public record. Right?

Just a dumb statement. My "logic" included no such conclusion. That came from the shallows of your intellect.