If You Were Joyously Anticipating The Demise Of The Democrat Party........

[Lumpy 1]

1. ......here is the danger the nation faces.
If we become the only party, watch out for the same from our side that we hated by them.

Online Library of Liberty
Online Library of Liberty › quotes › lord-acton-writes-to...
Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.



2. Sometimes what seems like a great idea gets out of hand.


3. "Donald Trump’s designation of “antifa” as a “domestic terrorist organization” last week....Trump signed a national security policy memorandum called “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” known as NSPM-7.


4. ....NPSM-7 “directs a new national strategy to ‘disrupt’ any individual or groups ‘that foment political violence,’ including ‘before they result in violent political acts.’”



5. ....the “indicia” (indicators) of future political violence listed in the report are:

• anti-Americanism,
• anti-capitalism,
• anti-Christianity,
• support for the overthrow of the United States Government,
• extremism on migration,
• extremism on race,
• extremism on gender
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family,
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality."
• Trump Classifies “Anti-Capitalism” as a Political Pre-Crime

IS this really how far we, who voted for Trump, want to go????????????????

Mmm .. it's a tricky situation no doubt.. but then .. what's the reasonable alternative?

 

[beagle9]

NSPM-7 / NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM - orders to all law enforcement​

North America

TLDR;

Trump has issued a National Security Directive ( way different than an Executive Order ) instructing all Federal law enforcement and most local law enforcement to proactively go after MAGA's enemies.

NSPM-7 directs a new national strategy to “disrupt” any individual or groups “that foment political violence,” including “before they result in violent political acts.”

This week, Hegseth will give the same orders to the entire US military.

End TLDR;

Potentially every police force in America will carry out Trump's orders

It's really easy - Don't engage in violent speak, and don't resort to violence ever, and everyone will be A-ok.

We've been needing to tweak the 2nd amendment a little bit in order to stop the baiting and grooming of radicals by people in power who keep ranting and railing against the Republicans or good citizen's as if we are pure evil anti-American, when infact we absolutely are not anti-American, but instead we are American through and through.

It's time to keep the spotlight on the real culprits behind the assassination attempts, and who was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk along with the mass shooter's who gun down the innocents for political reasoning, and wildly because of domestic terrorist ideologies running amuck in society now.

Antifa is not anti-fascist like the WW2 group was, and in fact it's about as anti-fascist as a conservative Christian is an al-queda agent or member of that organization.

Antifa is a group that goes around making allies out of various group's in order to protect it's true agenda, orde or lifestyle by making those allies in hopes that they will return the favor by supporting the things that the so called mislabeled group aspires too.

Most rational people see and know what goes on in all of this stuff, and this they easily do by just watching the patterns and movements and rallies or protest that go on in which involve these people when they act or show up at various protest or places.

The government is cracking down on it all now, and it is finding out alot about the group along with it's support systems, and about it's donors.

Watched this video just now, and wow what a mess it all became during Democrat radicalism that has grown out of control over many many years now.



Access to our most vulnerable in society must be stopped, and that involves finding out every way that bad people have been able to access these young folks minds in order to highjack their minds.

 

[beagle9]

Do you think Trump would be that stupid? Of course there's no evidence of such, but the implication is there of such a possibility. And the same possibility that future would do it too. What we have here is a pretext to violate somebody's rights to speech and privacy, whether actually guilty of anything or not.





My suspicion is that somebody might be plotting, funding, and/or planning events that maybe not actually be intended to be violent, but the Trump administration or future administrations might investigate anyway. What this directive does is make it more risky to oppose and protest of politics and policies the president and his party, and that is dangerous to our rights to speech, assembly, and privacy. Yeah, it ain't in the wording of the directive, but the president and his administration could interpret it to squelch the opposition. It could very well be abused to target people who have no intent to commit violence. How does one determine that intention ahead of any act?

Thanks Democrats..

 

[beagle9]

Do you think Trump would be that stupid? Of course there's no evidence of such, but the implication is there of such a possibility. And the same possibility that future would do it too. What we have here is a pretext to violate somebody's rights to speech and privacy, whether actually guilty of anything or not.





My suspicion is that somebody might be plotting, funding, and/or planning events that maybe not actually be intended to be violent, but the Trump administration or future administrations might investigate anyway. What this directive does is make it more risky to oppose and protest of politics and policies the president and his party, and that is dangerous to our rights to speech, assembly, and privacy. Yeah, it ain't in the wording of the directive, but the president and his administration could interpret it to squelch the opposition. It could very well be abused to target people who have no intent to commit violence. How does one determine that intention ahead of any act?

I trust the repubs better than any Democrat on such matters.

 

[Foxfyre]

Do you think Trump would be that stupid? Of course there's no evidence of such, but the implication is there of such a possibility. And the same possibility that future would do it too. What we have here is a pretext to violate somebody's rights to speech and privacy, whether actually guilty of anything or not.





My suspicion is that somebody might be plotting, funding, and/or planning events that maybe not actually be intended to be violent, but the Trump administration or future administrations might investigate anyway. What this directive does is make it more risky to oppose and protest of politics and policies the president and his party, and that is dangerous to our rights to speech, assembly, and privacy. Yeah, it ain't in the wording of the directive, but the president and his administration could interpret it to squelch the opposition. It could very well be abused to target people who have no intent to commit violence. How does one determine that intention ahead of any act?

How is assuming Trump MIGHT do something wrong any different than him supposing anarchist or whatever groups MIGHT be plotting terrorism? If they aren't, there is no problem. And nothing whatsoever will happen to them.

Trump, who has NEVER violated any principle of free speech, should be given benefit of the doubt much more than leftist groups who HAVE plotted, condoned, funded, otherwise supported violence against American citizens.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Thank you and others for continuing to state the obvious.

If it is a violation of free speech in principle or fact for a sitting President to have as a directive to ferret out, prosecute, stop the domestic terrorists, i.e. those doing arson, vandalism, assault/battery/murder, block access to businesses/streets/highways/sidewalks,bridges etc., or otherwise planning, funding, promoting, instigating, carrying out violence against U.S. citizens, then we are done as a country. The Marxists, totalitarians, street thugs, the leftist extremists have won.

The Constitution is NOT a suicide pact.
Those sworn to Office, and the Military. are bound by that document of our founding.
Every oath swears to defend it from enemies abroad, and those that are DOMESTIC.
"Antifa" is BOTH, and they ae nothing new.
LEFT-over 1930's trash ideology.
Same flag too.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

The OP is about free speech.

Your view?

My view is maybe, OCCASIONALLY, you should practice free speech on other peoples' threads.

But that's just, like, my opinion maaaaan.

 

[Foxfyre]

I trust the repubs better than any Democrat on such matters.

Again I know of no Republican/MAGA/Patriot/libertarian (small "L") groups who are funding, planning, promoting, instigating or carrying out any terrorist activity anywhere. So yes, I trust them a lot more on this matter than any Democrat or RINO/neocon globalist /Libertarian (large "L".)

But if there is any indication than ANY are involved in violence against our citizens, they should be prosecuted the same as those on the left or who are otherwise antiAmerican. There is absolutely nothing in President Trump's directive to suggest they wouldnt be.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Who the **** is Maddie? I swear you'd **** up a wet dream!

Republicans are trying to step on the brake and Paul and Massie are turning off the ignition while pressing on the accelerator. They are not helping anything by siding with Democrats to get to the cliff faster!

Let's see how these brake stepping Republicans do with their new budgets

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Not helpful

Sure it's helpful!

Federal spending is a national crisis and needed to be addressed yesterday

The CR process is Congress abdicating their main function of presenting budgets

Republicans have used public service as a Federally Guaranteed get rich quick scheme just as democrats have

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Let's see how these brake stepping Republicans do with their new budgets

They have to get the Democrats to agree to any cuts and you know that is not happening. What do you propose they do?

 

[bdtex]

It shouldn't go this far.
We conservatives, unlike Liberals/Progressives/Democrats/communists/Bolsheviks, believe in free speech and not government censorship or cancel culture.



All Leftist agendas end the careers or lives of any who do not toe the line.


Here's your history lesson:


1. The French Revolution, which gave rise to the Russian Revolution, and that of Mao. Rousseau believed private property was the cause of the corruption of the human character, and private property should be abolished, and ending it would purify humanity. He believed that any who disagreed with the general will should be treated like a wild beast (killed). Government used terror as a policy.

Every Leftist administration conforms to this view.


2. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society."


3. "Karl Marx<a href="Karl Marx - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> (German: [ˈkaʁl ˈmaʁks]; 5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) was a German philosopher, political theorist, economist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. He is best-known for the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto (written with Friedrich Engels), and his three-volume Das Kapital (1867–1894), a critique of classical political economy which employs his theory of historical materialism in an analysis of capitalism, in the culmination of his life's work." Wikipedia
Marx inspired both Hitler and Lenin

A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the documentary "The Soviet Story")


4. Lenin, Hitler, Stallin, Mao, Pol Pot Castro, etc.



5. Democrat mayoralty candidate for NYC, Mamdani, supported and endorsed by major Democrat officials.
The Mamdani Democrat party stands for abolishing private property, socialist/communist, anti-Semitism, and racism.
And a Dem Senator said this should be the direction of the party.

Every post is a copy-n-pastepalooza.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They have to get the Democrats to agree to any cuts and you know that is not happening. What do you propose they do?

At least pretend it matters

Take it to the People. Let the People know that they're treating it like the Existential Threat it is

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

At least pretend it matters

Take it to the People. Let the People know that they're treating it like the Existential Threat it is

Take what to the people? At least try to explain what you mean.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Take what to the people? At least try to explain what you mean.

The American People

Once the People realize this is an Existential Threat, we will pressure our Representatives to act in our best interests

 

[beagle9]

The American People

Once the People realize this is an Existential Threat, we will pressure our Representatives to act in our best interests

And what is in our best interest ???
Giving the Democrats a lifeline worth 1.5 trillion dollars so they'll last 3 more year's doing their bull chit until Trump is out of office ??

Behind every move the Democrats make these days (due to powerful group's that have been created by them over the year's), they are trying to hold the nation hostage for thing's like transgenderism and men in women's sport's, gender affirming care, transitional surgeries, and every other abnormal created cult or lifestyle choice they back or promote over the majority will of the American people.

Obama thought he was the game changer when he came into office trying to appease every radical group for their combined support and numbers for votes, but in doing so he had to push agendas that were anti-American and anti-American values. Then he attempted to hand pick future official's that would insure compliance, and insure the future of the radical wing of the Democrat party.

Joe Biden was the biggest mistake the Democrats had made when it came to keeping their agenda in tact. Joe couldn't help but reveal the entire cabal because he was a first class (do anything the democrats wanted knucklehead), just as long as it gave his family the power to do anything it wanted for selfish and personal gains.

Convenient how he's disappeared from the scene because of his so called condition in life, but most feel that he and his cabal got away with destroying so much before they pardoned themselves on their way out.

We are all as patriotic Americans still dealing with the fall out of a government that was infiltrated and had lost it's way in the world.

Thank God the hostages are being released as a much more important side note, thank God..

 

[PoliticalChic]

The war that you are describing-

Decent people want that war.

A fool wants civil war.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I suspect unless somebody is plotting, funding, planning, instigating violence, nothing.

What is your evidence that they will do anything?

Noting that you still have not posted any direct evidence from ANY source that Trump or anybody in his administration wants to or intends to violate the principle or fact of free speech.

Fine....I'll put you down as being OK with surveilling other American citizens.

Ever hear of the Stasi?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Either we conduct a war on domestic terrorism or we fall to it. Now you weren't living in a cave for the last 20+year's, so either we address the situation promptly or we fail as a nation in which you should know the results of doing nothing for to long.

You want to become what we voted against.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nope.

And Trump better not try to codify any of this he'll be in for a rude awakening.

From whom?