If You Voted for Trump, Goodyear doesn't want your business

I believe this is more than four years old though. Seems to be from 2020 and it references Twitter and not X. I'm unable to find what their position is now but I bet it is a lot less anti-MAGA than shown in that video if that video is even accurate.
And?
Who was president 4 years ago?
Have they actually changed or made excuses
 
I always buy Michelin.

Goodyear is overpriced and substandard.
Like shooting fish in a barrel, not even slightly challenging any more.

1739644676189.webp
 
Oh, so you have no skills, except laying on your back and taking hubby's money.

The fact is that white women are the number 1 recipient of DEI. So you should shut your mouth about DEI and how terrible it is. Because if not for you living off your husband, your ass would be a DEI HIRE.
Better than you pimping out your hoes for your drug addiction.
 
So, you can't give an example?

Surely if companies have racist hiring practices so much so that something has to be done about it...
Something like what? in that hypothetical example what - if you were in charge of recruitment policies - would you do? how do you decide if anything even needs to be done?
You could come up with one example? No??
No, as I said this is a hypothetical question, imagine you were being interviewed for head of recruitment at some big firm and they asked you this question.

I've had many software design interviews over the years and they always ask hypothetical questions in order to emphasize the core issues.
 
Something like what? in that hypothetical example what - if you were in charge of recruitment policies - would you do?

DEI has been forced on companies for a few years now, especially companies that have gov't. contracts.

So, where is the evidence that companies are hiring based on race.....besides the DEI hires, which are race based among other identity initiatives.
 

Why White Women Benefitted The Most From DEI Programs​

Some Americans are shocked to learn that Black people are not the primary beneficiaries of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Because, for many, these policies are synonymous with discussions about race. While companies voluntarily adopted policies to address racial discrimination in the workplace during the 1960s and 70s, they were designed to help a number of marginalized groups, including religious minorities and veterans. White women have benefitted the most from DEI programs. While women remain underrepresented "at every stage of the corporate pipeline," a McKinsey study estimated it would take 48 years for women of color to achieve gender parity, while only 22 years for white women to reach this milestone.

On top of white women benefitting the most from DEI policies, they were also the group most likely to benefit from affirmative action policies. While many believe these policies only addressed racial disparities, gender-based affirmative action policies were more readily implemented. A 1995 study found that at least 6 million women, "the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn't otherwise hold," because of this policy. While affirmative action policies were initially used to follow through on promises to eradicate the poison of racial discrimination, more often than not, they were used to boost white women. To be clear, women are members of a marginalized group in America. It wasn't until the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974 that women could open their bank accounts. Or until 1988, when women could finally start their own businesses without a male cosigner. And yet, in the aftermath of Roe v Wade, protections for their reproductive rights were slashed. But that's only part of the story.

Historically speaking, white women have ascended the golden escalator of progress, often at the expense of racial minorities.

Nice words. Too bad your DEI cult masters won't show you the actual data. Keeps you on the plantation.
 
DEI has been forced on companies for a few years now, especially companies that have gov't. contracts.
I never mentioned DEI, I just stated a hypothetical scenario and sought your view on how - if at all - that would be dealt with if you encountered it and you had authority over recruitment policies.
So, where is the evidence that companies are hiring based on race.....besides the DEI hires, which are race based among other identity initiatives.
Forget DEI, lets just look at the simple scenario I outlined, like you were being asked this in some interview.

I don't think any interview I've ever had would have gone well if I resented a hypothetical question and tried to avoid answering it, they'd be pretty suspicious of me if I did.

"Sherlock, imagine we had a company wide update to Windows overnight and all the PC's from Dell refused to boot, how would you react to that as head of infrastructure here?"

Such questions are intended to get me to talk, reassure them, show that I have initiative, show I'm willing to face up to potentially serious situations. There might not be a "right" answer, they want me to talk about it.
 
Last edited:
If a company interviews 500 people for twenty jobs and the candidates all meet the skill and experience criteria and the pool of candidates was 20% Black, what should we conclude if we found that every candidate ultimately offered a job was white?

If this was happening and you knew about it, what would you think?

Talk me through this scenario and what conclusions you draw from it.

You could assume the company had racist hiring policies, but you couldn't prove that those hires were based on race.

My question points out this very point.

Is this racist?

1739645876969.webp



1739645994336.webp
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
I never mentioned DEI, I just stated a hypothetical scenario and sought your view on how - if at all - that would be dealt with if you encountered it and you had authority over recruitment policies.

Forget DEI, lets just look at the simple scenario I outlined, like you were being asked this in some interview.

I don't think any interview I've ever had would have gone well if I resented a hypothetical question and tried to avoid answering it, they'd be pretty suspicious of me if I did.



Such questions are intended to get me to talk, reassure them, show that I have initiative, show I'm willing to face up to potentially serious situations. There might not be a "right" answer, they want me to talk about it.

I'd rather talk about real things, not hypotheticals, myths, or misinformation.

This isn't an interview, and you are not offering anything I'm wanting to acquire.
 
Back
Top Bottom