If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[mamooth]

You made the claim at another forum being a PHD holder in Physics.

No, I didn't. Not ever.

Remember, I'm a liberal. That means I value the truth. Don't project your own life-philosophy of "the ends always justify the means" on to ethical people.

I am willing to allow that you're not actually lying. Due to some sort of brain damage, you may actually believe the stuff you make up. There are various possibilities. Senility, lead poisoning, substance abuse, fetal alcohol syndrome, diabetic brain damage, COVID brain fog, traumatic head injury ... so many possiblities.

The rest of your post is all word salad while avoiding my NOAA challenge, while ignoring the databased links and ignoring his own Abstract stupidity.

Your links never apply to the crap you talk about. That's my point.

And as you never made a "NOAA challenge", I'll write that off as your brain damage talking again.

 

[Sunsettommy]

No, I didn't. Not ever.

Remember, I'm a liberal. That means I value the truth. Don't project your own life-philosophy of "the ends always justify the means" on to ethical people.

I am willing to allow that you're not actually lying. Due to some sort of brain damage, you may actually believe the stuff you make up. There are various possibilities. Senility, lead poisoning, substance abuse, fetal alcohol syndrome, diabetic brain damage, COVID brain fog, traumatic head injury ... so many possiblities.


Your links never apply to the crap you talk about. That's my point.

And as you never made a "NOAA challenge", I'll write that off as your brain damage talking again.

So you got nothing thank you for defeating yourself..... again.

You lie is already well known about your PHD claim thus you can't escape it as many knows about it at the forum and I made sure some knows about it too as it was a simple link to your post that got many to read it.

Your lie is stupid.

 

[ding]

Why do you think that question isn't stupid, and that it doesn't make you look like a cult mouthbreather?

Because it does. It uses the "DERP! DERP! Climate changed in the past, so humans can't change climate! DEEEEERRRRRRRRRP!" fallacy.

See what I just did there? I made a point clearly and directly. Not being a gutless cultist, I can do that. Deniers can't. All they can do is deflect and cry.

For this reason.

 

[ding]

Orbital cycles, the logarithmic nature of CO2 forcing, and feedback.

Orbital cycles cool the planet a bit. More CO2 goes into the oceans, the planet cools more, and the feedback cycle continues.

This is basic stuff, and all the deniers fail at in completely. They really have no business annoying the grownups.

Orbital cycles don't change solar radiation enough to cause glacial or interglacial periods. Show the math.

 

[abu afak]

Orbital cycles don't change solar radiation enough to cause glacial or interglacial periods. Show the math.

Classic !!
Why just yesteday...

EDIT: Note the NO Rebutttal post of the denier Troll 'ding.'
He writes One line or dumps an Irrelevant Graph.
He has No Real Game and is Non-conversant except in the Religion section. Stay there Boy.

`

 

[ding]

Classic !!
Why just yesteday...

`

I keep hoping that one day you will learn how to write a coherent paragraph.

 

[abu afak]

I keep hoping that one day you will learn how to write a coherent paragraph.

Classic #47,854 !!
Why just yesteday... and again above:

Note the NO Rebutttal post of the denier Troll 'ding.'
He writes One line or dumps an Irrelevant Graph.
He has No Real Game and is Non-conversant except in the Religion section. Stay there Boy.

`

No one else seems to have a problem.
And even you only have a problem when You are Crushed.. OFTEN.
Of course, you are a Pathological post coverer (and oft run 5 or 6 threads in as many minutes) as well as a liar with no game at all.
One never has to worry about your LACK of paragraphs.

Stay in Religion where you can at least explain/justify your subjective opinions... Rev.
As I said...
Here, you post One line... or oft an idiotic graph from nowhere with inappropriate claim/conclusion.
`

 

[ding]

Classic #47,854 !!
Why just yesteday... and again above:

`

No one else seems to have a problem.
And even you only have a problem when You are Crushed.. OFTEN.
Of course, you are a Pathological post coverer (and oft run 5 or 6 threads in as many minutes) as well as a liar with no game at all.
One never has to worry about your LACK of paragraphs.

Stay in Religion where you can at least explain/justify your subjective opinions... Rev.
As I said...
Here, you post One line... or oft an idiotic graph from nowhere with inappropriate claim/conclusion.
`

I am going to keep hoping that one day you will learn how to write coherent paragraphs. Maybe start small with just one sentence to see how it feels?

 

[abu afak]

I am going to keep hoping that one day you will learn how to write coherent paragraphs. Maybe start small with just one sentence to see how it feels?

No one else seems to have a problem.
And even you only have a problem when You are Crushed.. OFTEN.
Of course, you are a Pathological post coverer (and oft run 5 or 6 threads in as many minutes) as well as a liar with no game at all.
One never has to worry about your LACK of paragraphs.

Stay in Religion where you can at least explain/justify your subjective opinions... Rev.
As I said...
Here, you post One line or oft an idiotic graph from nowhere with inappropriate claim/conclusion.
`

 

[ding]

No one else seems to have a problem.
And even you only have a problem when You are Crushed.. OFTEN.
Of course, you are a Pathological post coverer (and oft run 5 or 6 threads in as many minutes) as well as a liar with no game at all.
One never has to worry about your LACK of paragraphs.

Stay in Religion where you can at least explain/justify your subjective opinions... Rev.
As I said...
Here, you post One line or oft an idiotic graph from nowhere with inappropriate claim/conclusion.
`

Help me help you.

 

[Robert W]

Why do you think that question isn't stupid, and that it doesn't make you look like a cult mouthbreather?

Because it does. It uses the "DERP! DERP! Climate changed in the past, so humans can't change climate! DEEEEERRRRRRRRRP!" fallacy.

See what I just did there? I made a point clearly and directly. Not being a gutless cultist, I can do that. Deniers can't. All they can do is deflect and cry.

Why duck Dings important questions?

 

[abu afak]

Why duck Dings important questions?

What important questions 75 IQ guy?
I've answewered/refuted them HUNDREDS of Times, but he's a sick Troll.
An obnoxious mentally ill last-wording child.

Unfortunately this board is not refereed for content/debate outcome or mental illness.
ding is actully sicker/more juvenile than EMH.
`

 

[Robert W]

What important quetions 75 IQ guy?
I've answewered/refuted them HUNDREDS of Times, but he's a sick Troll.
An obnoxious mentally ill last-wording child.

`

Your story is man is controlling climate. But you can't prove it.

 

[abu afak]

Your story is man is controlling climate. But you can't prove it.

It's My Accepted Science (not a "story").
I can and have shown overwhelming Evidence of such.
Read my OP in "How do we know Humans are causing Climate change" and the links within.
I have also posted in my own words hundreds of times.

I also posted Exxon Mobil's 'Admission Against Interest' that WE ARE Warming the planet and their Incredibly accurate 40+ year Temperature predictions based on that FACT.

It's only very low IQers and the mentally ill conspiracists who don't believe now.
And you ARE Breathtakingly stupid. Somewhere between CrusaderFrank and a Chipmunk.
`

 

[ding]

What important questions 75 IQ guy?
I've answewered/refuted them HUNDREDS of Times, but he's a sick Troll.
An obnoxious mentally ill last-wording child.

Unfortunately this board is not refereed for content/debate outcome or mental illness.
ding is actully sicker/more juvenile than EMH.
`

I believe EMH is your sock.

 

[abu afak]

I believe EMH is your sock.

And I know you are sicker than he is.
I was the first one to advocate for his removal. This pace is incredibly Stupid/page view hungry/Troll-Tolerant or YOU would be gone too.
EMH was throw off everywhere else in 30 days.

You're a Baiting Child who knows he's Lying! and gets joy out of it.
You know AGW is true, but you are sick.. deeply and obnoxiously 'contrary' sick.
You need to turn the truth upside down to live for your other Schizo religious ideas.
`

 

[ding]

And I know you are sicker than he is.
(I was the first one to advocate for his removal)
You're a Baiting Child who knows he's Lying! and gets joy out of it.
You know AGW is true, but you are sick.. deeply and obnoxiously sick.
`

My turn. Your posts are mostly incoherent. You have the behavior of demanding child. You have no understanding of the science or what the IPCC is really even claiming. You are a political ideolog and your only basis for believing in abrupt manmade global warming is because you were told to believe that. I don't believe AGW is true. The theoretical surface temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 is 1C. That's it. When the northern hemisphere deglaciates the planet warms like it is doing today. The present climate is 2C colder than the previous interglacial which had 26 ft higher seas but 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2.

 

[ding]

As I said ..
no one else has a problem
And with my 7900 posts I have made 100x your impact dasspite your 130,000 trolling one liners.
`

Everyone has a problem with you and I suspect they all see you the same way that I see you.

 

[ding]

As I said ..
no one else has a problem
And with my 7900 posts I have made 100x your impact despite your 130,000 trolling one liners.
You're an obnoxious little one-line baiter with no game.
(And I go back to Mensa for discussion, you to the USMB Church section)
`

And as I said... Everyone has a problem with you and I suspect they all see you the same way that I see you.

 

[Robert W]

It's My Accepted Science (not a "story").
I can and have shown overwhelming Evidence of such.
Read my OP in "How do we know Humans are causing Climate change" and the links within.
I have also posted in my own words hundreds of times.

I also posted Exxon Mobil's 'Admission Against Interest' that WE ARE Warming the planet and their Incredibly accurate 40+ year Temperature predictions based on that FACT.

It's only very low IQers and the mentally ill conspiracists who don't believe now.
And you ARE Breathtakingly stupid. Somewhere between CrusaderFrank and a Chipmunk.
`

Name who is controlling climate? Why would they want Earth very hot?
The scientists I often use don't believe that at all. They are also Climatologists.

What do you personally do to not heat the climate? Why are you angry?